You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> on 2002/09/14 00:21:06 UTC
Showstoppers on 2.0.41
I see two blocking issues, based on STRIKER_2_0_41_PRE2
One is an absolute must... gotta push back apr-util/include/apu.hw
to rev 1.10 or we don't build on win32.
The other is a nice-to-have with "no excuses"(R)... reverse the -c flag
for the htpasswd (and htdigest et al?) support utilities. How many
versions in a row can we release broken versions of such a simple utility?
Bill
Re: Showstoppers on 2.0.41
Posted by Peter Van Biesen <pe...@vlafo.be>.
Hi,
I finally got the time to compile 2.0.43; the problem is solved !
Thanks to all those who searched an found memory leaks !!
Peter.
Peter Van Biesen wrote:
>There was still a memory leak when downloading large files, but only
>when proxy chaining. I haven't tested the latest release yet as my boss
>wants me to do other things, but I'll do it as soon as I can. Anyway,
>this problem, if it were not to be fixed, should not stop the release of
>2.0.41, as it only occurs with files larger than 70 Mb and when
>proxychaining.
>
>Peter.
>
>Brian Pane wrote:
>
>
>>On Fri, 2002-09-13 at 15:21, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I see two blocking issues, based on STRIKER_2_0_41_PRE2
>>>
>>>One is an absolute must... gotta push back apr-util/include/apu.hw
>>>to rev 1.10 or we don't build on win32.
>>>
>>>The other is a nice-to-have with "no excuses"(R)... reverse the -c flag
>>>for the htpasswd (and htdigest et al?) support utilities. How many
>>>versions in a row can we release broken versions of such a simple utility?
>>>
>>>Bill
>>>
>>>
>>A couple of others:
>> * 2.0.41 should include the fix for disabling native atomics
>> on Sparcs (apr/include/apr_atomic.h 1.36, which is one rev
>> newer than the STRIKER_2_0_41_PRE2 tag).
>> * If anybody has a memory leak test case that still appears
>> under _PRE2, please speak up soon!
>>
>>-Brian
>>
>>
>
>
>
Re: Showstoppers on 2.0.41
Posted by Peter Van Biesen <pe...@vlafo.be>.
There was still a memory leak when downloading large files, but only
when proxy chaining. I haven't tested the latest release yet as my boss
wants me to do other things, but I'll do it as soon as I can. Anyway,
this problem, if it were not to be fixed, should not stop the release of
2.0.41, as it only occurs with files larger than 70 Mb and when
proxychaining.
Peter.
Brian Pane wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2002-09-13 at 15:21, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > I see two blocking issues, based on STRIKER_2_0_41_PRE2
> >
> > One is an absolute must... gotta push back apr-util/include/apu.hw
> > to rev 1.10 or we don't build on win32.
> >
> > The other is a nice-to-have with "no excuses"(R)... reverse the -c flag
> > for the htpasswd (and htdigest et al?) support utilities. How many
> > versions in a row can we release broken versions of such a simple utility?
> >
> > Bill
>
> A couple of others:
> * 2.0.41 should include the fix for disabling native atomics
> on Sparcs (apr/include/apr_atomic.h 1.36, which is one rev
> newer than the STRIKER_2_0_41_PRE2 tag).
> * If anybody has a memory leak test case that still appears
> under _PRE2, please speak up soon!
>
> -Brian
RE: Showstoppers on 2.0.41
Posted by Brian Pane <br...@apache.org>.
On Sat, 2002-09-14 at 10:46, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> There have been some mod_cache, cache_storage, mod_disk_cache and
> mod_mem_cache fixes which would be nice to pick up in 2.0.41
+1
Brian
RE: Showstoppers on 2.0.41
Posted by Bill Stoddard <bi...@wstoddard.com>.
> > From: Brian Pane [mailto:brianp@apache.org]
> > Sent: 14 September 2002 11:20
>
> > On Fri, 2002-09-13 at 15:21, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > > I see two blocking issues, based on STRIKER_2_0_41_PRE2
> > >
> > > One is an absolute must... gotta push back apr-util/include/apu.hw
> > > to rev 1.10 or we don't build on win32.
> > >
> > > The other is a nice-to-have with "no excuses"(R)... reverse
> the -c flag
> > > for the htpasswd (and htdigest et al?) support utilities. How many
> > > versions in a row can we release broken versions of such a
> simple utility?
> > >
> > > Bill
> >
> > A couple of others:
> > * 2.0.41 should include the fix for disabling native atomics
> > on Sparcs (apr/include/apr_atomic.h 1.36, which is one rev
> > newer than the STRIKER_2_0_41_PRE2 tag).
>
> This one is on my list.
>
> Sander
There have been some mod_cache, cache_storage, mod_disk_cache and
mod_mem_cache fixes which would be nice to pick up in 2.0.41
Bill
RE: Showstoppers on 2.0.41
Posted by Sander Striker <st...@apache.org>.
> From: Brian Pane [mailto:brianp@apache.org]
> Sent: 14 September 2002 11:20
> On Fri, 2002-09-13 at 15:21, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > I see two blocking issues, based on STRIKER_2_0_41_PRE2
> >
> > One is an absolute must... gotta push back apr-util/include/apu.hw
> > to rev 1.10 or we don't build on win32.
> >
> > The other is a nice-to-have with "no excuses"(R)... reverse the -c flag
> > for the htpasswd (and htdigest et al?) support utilities. How many
> > versions in a row can we release broken versions of such a simple utility?
> >
> > Bill
>
> A couple of others:
> * 2.0.41 should include the fix for disabling native atomics
> on Sparcs (apr/include/apr_atomic.h 1.36, which is one rev
> newer than the STRIKER_2_0_41_PRE2 tag).
This one is on my list.
Sander
Re: Showstoppers on 2.0.41
Posted by Brian Pane <br...@apache.org>.
On Fri, 2002-09-13 at 15:21, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> I see two blocking issues, based on STRIKER_2_0_41_PRE2
>
> One is an absolute must... gotta push back apr-util/include/apu.hw
> to rev 1.10 or we don't build on win32.
>
> The other is a nice-to-have with "no excuses"(R)... reverse the -c flag
> for the htpasswd (and htdigest et al?) support utilities. How many
> versions in a row can we release broken versions of such a simple utility?
>
> Bill
A couple of others:
* 2.0.41 should include the fix for disabling native atomics
on Sparcs (apr/include/apr_atomic.h 1.36, which is one rev
newer than the STRIKER_2_0_41_PRE2 tag).
* If anybody has a memory leak test case that still appears
under _PRE2, please speak up soon!
-Brian
RE: Showstoppers on 2.0.41
Posted by Sander Striker <st...@apache.org>.
> From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:wrowe@rowe-clan.net]
> Sent: 14 September 2002 00:21
> I see two blocking issues, based on STRIKER_2_0_41_PRE2
>
> One is an absolute must... gotta push back apr-util/include/apu.hw
> to rev 1.10 or we don't build on win32.
Well, that's not a problem. I'll take that into account for the final
tag.
> The other is a nice-to-have with "no excuses"(R)... reverse the -c flag
> for the htpasswd (and htdigest et al?) support utilities. How many
> versions in a row can we release broken versions of such a simple utility?
Point taken.
Sander