[jira] [Commented] (JENA-1480) Bad Request 400 returned when clicking "count triples in all graphs" in Fuseki info

["Andy Seaborne (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16358448#comment-16358448 ] 

Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-1480:
-------------------------------------

I can't reproduce this with the current development snapshot nor with 3.6.0.

BTW there is no Jena 3.7.0 yet. The latest fuseki2 is 3.6.0 - note the align of version numbers, so 2.6.0 is not the latest.

I notice that in the description there is a backslash-\{. That would cause a 400.

I tried, with the current development snapshot, and "count triples in all graph" worked for me. This is with a union default graph.

400 errors from Fuseki usually have more details in the body - what does that say?


> Bad Request 400 returned when clicking "count triples in all graphs" in Fuseki info
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENA-1480
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1480
>             Project: Apache Jena
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Fuseki
>    Affects Versions: Jena 3.7.0
>            Reporter: David Cook
>            Priority: Minor
>
> When I click "count triples in all graphs", the UI doesn't change and I see the following in the Chrome console:
> {noformat}
> GET <FUSEKI_URL>/query?query=select%20(count(*)%20as%20?count)%20\{?s%20?p%20?o}
> 400 (Bad Request)
> jquery-1.10.2.min.js:6
> {noformat}
> I've experienced this in Fuseki 2.6.0 when using the WAR too. I'm also using the "tdb:unionDefaultGraph true" configuration setting.
> I've used someone else's install of Fuseki 2.5.0 and it works for them. I don't think they're using "tdb:unionDefaultGraph true", and I'm not sure if they're using the WAR or a standalone. Since there is no Server: Apache-Coyote response header, I'm guessing they're using the standalone. I don't know if that would make a difference. 
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)