You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tapestry.apache.org by "Jochen Kemnade (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/07/31 13:41:04 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (TAP5-2263) IOC decorator matching bug

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Jochen Kemnade resolved TAP5-2263.
----------------------------------
    Resolution: Not A Problem

I think the matching works correctly. Feel free to reopen if you disagree.

> IOC decorator matching bug
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAP5-2263
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2263
>             Project: Tapestry 5
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: tapestry-ioc
>    Affects Versions: 5.4
>            Reporter: Adriaan Joubert
>            Assignee: Jochen Kemnade
>              Labels: easyfix
>
> In our implementation we have a factory service CacheFactory, with markers, that is injected into a Cache service with the same markers (say @MarkerA). In tests, I wish to replace the CacheFactory with
> @Decorate
> @MarkerA
> public CacheFactory decorate(...) {}
> However I get an error that the decorate method returns the wrong type. 
> The cause is that the matching of the decorators in the module implementation does not match on ServiceDef and markers. Specifically in 
> ModuleImpl.findMatchingDecoratorDefs there is a condition
> if (def.matches(serviceDef) || markerMatched(serviceDef, InternalUtils.toDecoratorDef2(def)))
>                 result.add(def);
> which needs to be
> if (def.matches(serviceDef) && markerMatched(serviceDef, InternalUtils.toDecoratorDef2(def)))
>                 result.add(def);
> to fix the problem. With the || it matches unrelated service definitions with the same markers.
> Thanks!



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)