You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@metamodel.apache.org by Kasper Sørensen <i....@gmail.com> on 2017/05/11 02:21:25 UTC
Suggestion to release MetaModel 5.0-RC1
Hi all,
I think that considerable work has been put into the MetaModel 5.0 branch
("5.x") and while discussions still exist on what the full scope of the
release should be, I think what we have is very good and I would personally
love to start using it. So how about we release a version called 5.0-RC1.
This would indicate that many of the breaking changes (update summary
returns, java 7 support dropped, use of function types) are available, but
the scope is still being worked on in terms of feature additions.
We should do the release from the 5.x branch and keep the master branch
available for the 4.x releases that would still be considered the
official/stable branch.
Best regards,
Kasper
Re: Suggestion to release MetaModel 5.0-RC1
Posted by Kasper Sørensen <i....@gmail.com>.
Cool, I'll try and stage a release then.
2017-05-17 0:32 GMT-07:00 Tomasz Guziałek <to...@guzialek.info>:
> Hi Kasper,
>
> Sounds like a good idea, +1 from me.
>
> Pozdrawiam / Regards / Med venlig hilsen
> Tomasz Guziałek
>
> 2017-05-17 5:38 GMT+02:00 Kasper Sørensen <i.am.kasper.sorensen@gmail.com
> >:
>
> > Bump. Any thoughts?
> >
> > 2017-05-10 19:21 GMT-07:00 Kasper Sørensen <i.am.kasper.sorensen@gmail.
> com
> > >:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I think that considerable work has been put into the MetaModel 5.0
> branch
> > > ("5.x") and while discussions still exist on what the full scope of the
> > > release should be, I think what we have is very good and I would
> > personally
> > > love to start using it. So how about we release a version called
> 5.0-RC1.
> > > This would indicate that many of the breaking changes (update summary
> > > returns, java 7 support dropped, use of function types) are available,
> > but
> > > the scope is still being worked on in terms of feature additions.
> > >
> > > We should do the release from the 5.x branch and keep the master branch
> > > available for the 4.x releases that would still be considered the
> > > official/stable branch.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Kasper
> > >
> >
>
Re: Suggestion to release MetaModel 5.0-RC1
Posted by Tomasz Guziałek <to...@guzialek.info>.
Hi Kasper,
Sounds like a good idea, +1 from me.
Pozdrawiam / Regards / Med venlig hilsen
Tomasz Guziałek
2017-05-17 5:38 GMT+02:00 Kasper Sørensen <i....@gmail.com>:
> Bump. Any thoughts?
>
> 2017-05-10 19:21 GMT-07:00 Kasper Sørensen <i.am.kasper.sorensen@gmail.com
> >:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I think that considerable work has been put into the MetaModel 5.0 branch
> > ("5.x") and while discussions still exist on what the full scope of the
> > release should be, I think what we have is very good and I would
> personally
> > love to start using it. So how about we release a version called 5.0-RC1.
> > This would indicate that many of the breaking changes (update summary
> > returns, java 7 support dropped, use of function types) are available,
> but
> > the scope is still being worked on in terms of feature additions.
> >
> > We should do the release from the 5.x branch and keep the master branch
> > available for the 4.x releases that would still be considered the
> > official/stable branch.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Kasper
> >
>
Re: Suggestion to release MetaModel 5.0-RC1
Posted by Dennis Du Krøger <De...@humaninference.com>.
Weird, I was sure that I replied, but I can't find it in the send folder, so probably my imagination... 😊
I totally agree, for one.
Best regards,
Dennis
________________________________
From: Kasper Sørensen <i....@gmail.com>
Sent: 17 May 2017 05:38:40
To: dev@metamodel.apache.org
Subject: Re: Suggestion to release MetaModel 5.0-RC1
Bump. Any thoughts?
2017-05-10 19:21 GMT-07:00 Kasper Sørensen <i....@gmail.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> I think that considerable work has been put into the MetaModel 5.0 branch
> ("5.x") and while discussions still exist on what the full scope of the
> release should be, I think what we have is very good and I would personally
> love to start using it. So how about we release a version called 5.0-RC1.
> This would indicate that many of the breaking changes (update summary
> returns, java 7 support dropped, use of function types) are available, but
> the scope is still being worked on in terms of feature additions.
>
> We should do the release from the 5.x branch and keep the master branch
> available for the 4.x releases that would still be considered the
> official/stable branch.
>
> Best regards,
> Kasper
>
Re: Suggestion to release MetaModel 5.0-RC1
Posted by Kasper Sørensen <i....@gmail.com>.
Bump. Any thoughts?
2017-05-10 19:21 GMT-07:00 Kasper Sørensen <i....@gmail.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> I think that considerable work has been put into the MetaModel 5.0 branch
> ("5.x") and while discussions still exist on what the full scope of the
> release should be, I think what we have is very good and I would personally
> love to start using it. So how about we release a version called 5.0-RC1.
> This would indicate that many of the breaking changes (update summary
> returns, java 7 support dropped, use of function types) are available, but
> the scope is still being worked on in terms of feature additions.
>
> We should do the release from the 5.x branch and keep the master branch
> available for the 4.x releases that would still be considered the
> official/stable branch.
>
> Best regards,
> Kasper
>