You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@pdfbox.apache.org by "John Hewson (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/07/20 23:49:04 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (PDFBOX-2894) Remove COSStreamArray / SequenceRandomAccessRead

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

John Hewson resolved PDFBOX-2894.
---------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed

> Remove COSStreamArray / SequenceRandomAccessRead
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PDFBOX-2894
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-2894
>             Project: PDFBox
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0
>            Reporter: John Hewson
>            Assignee: John Hewson
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: 166292-fi-ligature.pdf, 166292-fi-ligature_unc.pdf
>
>
> This ties in with my COSStream simplification in PDFBOX-2893.
> COSStreamArray is a troublesome abstraction, it's not a real COS object and it's the only COS object which can be generated _after_ parsing. Look at the implementation of COSStreamArray, most methods throw an exception because it's _not_ a COSStream - it violates the contact of the very thing it claims to be. Even PDPageContentStream has to use instanceof to "peer through"  the abstraction of COSStreamArray.
> There's no reason to have this class, other than to duck-tape flaws in 1.8's APIs, namely that PDPage#getStream() returns a PDStream and PDFStreamParser expects a PDStream, yet both of these may be arrays of streams.
> We can fix this in 2.0 by getting rid of the erroneous PDPage#getStream() and by exposing the array of streams, rather than attempting to hide them. Hopefully this will also fix existing errors which may be lurking throughout the codebase (see first comment, below) which are associated with mistaking COSStreamArray for a COSStream. We can still provide an InputStream API which abstracts over the array of streams, because there's nothing wrong with that - so users can have the same simple and convenient experience.
> An added benefit of doing this is that it will allow us to remove SequenceRandomAccessRead, a highly complex memory-holding class.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@pdfbox.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@pdfbox.apache.org