You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@dubbo.apache.org by Minxuan Zhuang <z8...@gmail.com> on 2018/07/05 03:00:33 UTC
[Discuss] new version of dubbo ops
Hi,Community：
Previously, I changed Dubbo ops back end framework from webx into spring
boots. Now I have some suggestions about what to do next:
Two ultimate goals:
1. Make Dubbo admin and Dubbo ops to be a project
2. change the front end frame to the popular bootstrap+Vue.js
The new version of Dubbo ops contains all functions in the current version,
including service research, weight adjustment, and information check in
monitor.
Do you have any other suggestions ? please feel free to reply this.
Re: [Discuss] new version of dubbo ops
Posted by Xin Wang <xi...@gmail.com>.
Authority system should be redesigned：
1、Smaller granularity permissions control
2、Can match the authority system of the business system itself
马金凯 <ma...@vip.qq.com> 于2018年7月5日周四 下午3:51写道：
> How about pluggable alarms module
>
>
> ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
> 发件人: "Zonghai Shang"<yi...@apache.org>;
> 发送时间: 2018年7月5日(星期四) 下午3:39
> 收件人: "dev"<de...@dubbo.apache.org>;
>
> 主题: Re: [Discuss] new version of dubbo ops
>
>
>
> +1 for merge admin and monitor to one
> +1 for use bootstrap+Vue.js for front end rendering, rest framwork is more
> flexible.
>
> Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com> 于2018年7月5日周四 下午3:26写道：
>
> > +1 for merge admin and monitor to one
> > +0.5 for use bootstrap+Vue.js. I wouldn't choose to implement it with a
> > SPA/JavaScript framework. Don't get me wrong, this kind of technology is
> > great if have to integrate with a third-part service or if you want to
> sell
> > your software as a service, but in this case (imho) it doesn't make much
> > sense. Choosing a JavaScript/REST architecture means working double on
> > server side since you have to implement both your business logic and the
> > REST APIs to expose it. It also means that you have to adopt a
> token-based
> > authentication mechanism which is usually far more complex than a
> > session-based one. So I wouldn't move away from a Java web framework.
> >
> > Just my 2 cents.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Yang Tao <yw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 +1
> > >
> > > Yong Zhu <di...@gmail.com> 于2018年7月5日周四 上午11:05写道：
> > >
> > > > +1 for merge admin and monitor to one
> > > > +1 for use bootstrap+Vue.js
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 11:00 AM Minxuan Zhuang <z8...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,Community：
> > > > >
> > > > > Previously, I changed Dubbo ops back end framework from webx into
> > > spring
> > > > > boots. Now I have some suggestions about what to do next:
> > > > >
> > > > > Two ultimate goals:
> > > > > 1. Make Dubbo admin and Dubbo ops to be a project
> > > > > 2. change the front end frame to the popular bootstrap+Vue.js
> > > > > The new version of Dubbo ops contains all functions in the current
> > > > version,
> > > > > including service research, weight adjustment, and information
> check
> > in
> > > > > monitor.
> > > > > Do you have any other suggestions ? please feel free to reply this.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrea Del Bene.
> > Apache Wicket committer.
> >
回复： [Discuss] new version of dubbo ops
Posted by 马金凯 <ma...@vip.qq.com>.
How about pluggable alarms module
------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
发件人: "Zonghai Shang"<yi...@apache.org>;
发送时间: 2018年7月5日(星期四) 下午3:39
收件人: "dev"<de...@dubbo.apache.org>;
主题: Re: [Discuss] new version of dubbo ops
+1 for merge admin and monitor to one
+1 for use bootstrap+Vue.js for front end rendering, rest framwork is more
flexible.
Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com> 于2018年7月5日周四 下午3:26写道：
> +1 for merge admin and monitor to one
> +0.5 for use bootstrap+Vue.js. I wouldn't choose to implement it with a
> SPA/JavaScript framework. Don't get me wrong, this kind of technology is
> great if have to integrate with a third-part service or if you want to sell
> your software as a service, but in this case (imho) it doesn't make much
> sense. Choosing a JavaScript/REST architecture means working double on
> server side since you have to implement both your business logic and the
> REST APIs to expose it. It also means that you have to adopt a token-based
> authentication mechanism which is usually far more complex than a
> session-based one. So I wouldn't move away from a Java web framework.
>
> Just my 2 cents.
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Yang Tao <yw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 +1
> >
> > Yong Zhu <di...@gmail.com> 于2018年7月5日周四 上午11:05写道：
> >
> > > +1 for merge admin and monitor to one
> > > +1 for use bootstrap+Vue.js
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 11:00 AM Minxuan Zhuang <z8...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,Community：
> > > >
> > > > Previously, I changed Dubbo ops back end framework from webx into
> > spring
> > > > boots. Now I have some suggestions about what to do next:
> > > >
> > > > Two ultimate goals:
> > > > 1. Make Dubbo admin and Dubbo ops to be a project
> > > > 2. change the front end frame to the popular bootstrap+Vue.js
> > > > The new version of Dubbo ops contains all functions in the current
> > > version,
> > > > including service research, weight adjustment, and information check
> in
> > > > monitor.
> > > > Do you have any other suggestions ? please feel free to reply this.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Andrea Del Bene.
> Apache Wicket committer.
>
Re: [Discuss] new version of dubbo ops
Posted by Zonghai Shang <yi...@apache.org>.
+1 for merge admin and monitor to one
+1 for use bootstrap+Vue.js for front end rendering, rest framwork is more
flexible.
Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com> 于2018年7月5日周四 下午3:26写道：
> +1 for merge admin and monitor to one
> +0.5 for use bootstrap+Vue.js. I wouldn't choose to implement it with a
> SPA/JavaScript framework. Don't get me wrong, this kind of technology is
> great if have to integrate with a third-part service or if you want to sell
> your software as a service, but in this case (imho) it doesn't make much
> sense. Choosing a JavaScript/REST architecture means working double on
> server side since you have to implement both your business logic and the
> REST APIs to expose it. It also means that you have to adopt a token-based
> authentication mechanism which is usually far more complex than a
> session-based one. So I wouldn't move away from a Java web framework.
>
> Just my 2 cents.
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Yang Tao <yw...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 +1
> >
> > Yong Zhu <di...@gmail.com> 于2018年7月5日周四 上午11:05写道：
> >
> > > +1 for merge admin and monitor to one
> > > +1 for use bootstrap+Vue.js
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 11:00 AM Minxuan Zhuang <z8...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,Community：
> > > >
> > > > Previously, I changed Dubbo ops back end framework from webx into
> > spring
> > > > boots. Now I have some suggestions about what to do next:
> > > >
> > > > Two ultimate goals:
> > > > 1. Make Dubbo admin and Dubbo ops to be a project
> > > > 2. change the front end frame to the popular bootstrap+Vue.js
> > > > The new version of Dubbo ops contains all functions in the current
> > > version,
> > > > including service research, weight adjustment, and information check
> in
> > > > monitor.
> > > > Do you have any other suggestions ? please feel free to reply this.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Andrea Del Bene.
> Apache Wicket committer.
>
Re: [Discuss] new version of dubbo ops
Posted by Andrea Del Bene <an...@gmail.com>.
+1 for merge admin and monitor to one
+0.5 for use bootstrap+Vue.js. I wouldn't choose to implement it with a
SPA/JavaScript framework. Don't get me wrong, this kind of technology is
great if have to integrate with a third-part service or if you want to sell
your software as a service, but in this case (imho) it doesn't make much
sense. Choosing a JavaScript/REST architecture means working double on
server side since you have to implement both your business logic and the
REST APIs to expose it. It also means that you have to adopt a token-based
authentication mechanism which is usually far more complex than a
session-based one. So I wouldn't move away from a Java web framework.
Just my 2 cents.
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 8:44 AM, Yang Tao <yw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 +1
>
> Yong Zhu <di...@gmail.com> 于2018年7月5日周四 上午11:05写道：
>
> > +1 for merge admin and monitor to one
> > +1 for use bootstrap+Vue.js
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 11:00 AM Minxuan Zhuang <z8...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,Community：
> > >
> > > Previously, I changed Dubbo ops back end framework from webx into
> spring
> > > boots. Now I have some suggestions about what to do next:
> > >
> > > Two ultimate goals:
> > > 1. Make Dubbo admin and Dubbo ops to be a project
> > > 2. change the front end frame to the popular bootstrap+Vue.js
> > > The new version of Dubbo ops contains all functions in the current
> > version,
> > > including service research, weight adjustment, and information check in
> > > monitor.
> > > Do you have any other suggestions ? please feel free to reply this.
> > >
> >
>
--
Andrea Del Bene.
Apache Wicket committer.
Re: [Discuss] new version of dubbo ops
Posted by Yang Tao <yw...@gmail.com>.
+1 +1
Yong Zhu <di...@gmail.com> 于2018年7月5日周四 上午11:05写道：
> +1 for merge admin and monitor to one
> +1 for use bootstrap+Vue.js
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 11:00 AM Minxuan Zhuang <z8...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,Community：
> >
> > Previously, I changed Dubbo ops back end framework from webx into spring
> > boots. Now I have some suggestions about what to do next:
> >
> > Two ultimate goals:
> > 1. Make Dubbo admin and Dubbo ops to be a project
> > 2. change the front end frame to the popular bootstrap+Vue.js
> > The new version of Dubbo ops contains all functions in the current
> version,
> > including service research, weight adjustment, and information check in
> > monitor.
> > Do you have any other suggestions ? please feel free to reply this.
> >
>
Re: [Discuss] new version of dubbo ops
Posted by Yong Zhu <di...@gmail.com>.
+1 for merge admin and monitor to one
+1 for use bootstrap+Vue.js
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 11:00 AM Minxuan Zhuang <z8...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,Community：
>
> Previously, I changed Dubbo ops back end framework from webx into spring
> boots. Now I have some suggestions about what to do next:
>
> Two ultimate goals:
> 1. Make Dubbo admin and Dubbo ops to be a project
> 2. change the front end frame to the popular bootstrap+Vue.js
> The new version of Dubbo ops contains all functions in the current version,
> including service research, weight adjustment, and information check in
> monitor.
> Do you have any other suggestions ? please feel free to reply this.
>