[VOTE] Move BSF to the Attic

[Henri Yandell <ba...@apache.org>]

Proposing this as a challenge vote (i.e. if no one has a good -1
against something moving to the attic, it's a sign it should go to the
attic).

[ ] +1, G'night BSF
[ ] -1, No because:

----

Per Sebb's statement:

"Now that JSR-223 is part of Java 1.6 there is less need for BSF.
 There are no bugs oustanding against BSF 3.x. Not sure it is worth
fixing any of the 2.x bugs."

Hen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@jakarta.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Move BSF to the Attic

["Rony G. Flatscher" <Ro...@wu-wien.ac.at>]

[X] -1, No because:

there are outstanding bugs that should be fixed and I would do that, but need some time ("land-under-water" currently).

---rony



On 24.07.2011 08:27, Henri Yandell wrote:
> Proposing this as a challenge vote (i.e. if no one has a good -1
> against something moving to the attic, it's a sign it should go to the
> attic).
>
> [ ] +1, G'night BSF
> [ ] -1, No because:
>
> ----
>
> Per Sebb's statement:
>
> "Now that JSR-223 is part of Java 1.6 there is less need for BSF.
>  There are no bugs oustanding against BSF 3.x. Not sure it is worth
> fixing any of the 2.x bugs."
>
> Hen


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@jakarta.apache.org