You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@zookeeper.apache.org by "Colm O hEigeartaigh (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/12/20 12:51:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-3197) Improve documentation in
ZooKeeperServer.superSecret
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16725816#comment-16725816 ]
Colm O hEigeartaigh commented on ZOOKEEPER-3197:
------------------------------------------------
Any feedback from the community on this point?
> Improve documentation in ZooKeeperServer.superSecret
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ZOOKEEPER-3197
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3197
> Project: ZooKeeper
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Colm O hEigeartaigh
> Priority: Trivial
>
> A security scan flagged the use of a hard-coded secret (ZooKeeperServer.superSecret) in conjunction with a java Random instance to generate a password:
> byte[] generatePasswd(long id)
> { Random r = new Random(id ^ superSecret); byte p[] = new byte[16]; r.nextBytes(p); return p; }
> superSecret has the following javadoc:
> /**
> * This is the secret that we use to generate passwords, for the moment it
> * is more of a sanity check.
> */
> It is unclear from this comment and looking at the code why it is not a security risk. It would be good to update the javadoc along the lines of "Using a hard-coded secret with Random to generate a password is not a security risk because the resulting passwords are used for X, Y, Z and not for authentication etc" or something would be very helpful for anyone else looking at the code.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)