Re: pants_support_baseurls

[John Sirois <jo...@gmail.com>]

I just setup a bintray account and a little publish script so we have a
more stable serving system for these things.
I need to doc this a bit for pants maintainers and users alike, but thought
you might like to try it out.
Artifacts are here: http://dl.bintray.com/pantsbuild/bin
Publish script is here:
https://github.com/pantsbuild/binaries/blob/gh-pages/sync-bintray.sh

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Eric Ayers <zu...@squareup.com> wrote:

> At Square we have some binaries that we override, so we have an internal
> site for those, and then we fall back to this URL for others.
>
> pants_support_baseurls = [
>     'https://our-internal-machine/test-build-support',
>     'https://pantsbuild.github.io/binaries/build-support',
>   ]
>
> We have a comment to find a better solution. I’m not sure keeping binaries
> in github is a great long term thing because I’m not sure it could handle a
> lot of traffic.
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Joe Smith <ya...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>>
>> Aurora ran into an issue where it could not build on OS X 10.10
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-867>, and we didn't get
>> much clarity on the filed issue on github
>> <https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/issues/690>.
>>
>> I've sent out a review for Aurora <https://reviews.apache.org/r/27066/>
>> to use https://pantsbuild.github.io/binaries/build-support- does that
>> sound reasonable? If that's going to be ~stable for the foreseeable future
>> then that'd be awesome, but I don't want to force a public artifact store
>> on you guys if that's not its purpose.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Joe
>>
> ​
>

Re: pants_support_baseurls

[Joe Smith <ya...@gmail.com>]

Sent out a review at https://reviews.apache.org/r/27114/- John if you can
take a look, I'd appreciate it.

(In exchange, happy to send in an update to a doc or something if you point
me at what you'd like changed)

I've also sent out https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/pull/717, if you
guys would prefer to watch bintray reliability for a bit first, then I can
close it out until everyone's comfortable.

Thanks!

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 2:24 PM, Joe Smith <ya...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Aha- that's awesome. Cool, I'll move to that instead (and remove our TODO
> for you :)
>
> Thanks John!
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 2:02 PM, John Sirois <jo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I just setup a bintray account and a little publish script so we have a
>> more stable serving system for these things.
>> I need to doc this a bit for pants maintainers and users alike, but
>> thought you might like to try it out.
>> Artifacts are here: http://dl.bintray.com/pantsbuild/bin
>> Publish script is here:
>> https://github.com/pantsbuild/binaries/blob/gh-pages/sync-bintray.sh
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Eric Ayers <zu...@squareup.com> wrote:
>>
>>> At Square we have some binaries that we override, so we have an internal
>>> site for those, and then we fall back to this URL for others.
>>>
>>> pants_support_baseurls = [
>>>     'https://our-internal-machine/test-build-support',
>>>     'https://pantsbuild.github.io/binaries/build-support',
>>>   ]
>>>
>>> We have a comment to find a better solution. I’m not sure keeping
>>> binaries in github is a great long term thing because I’m not sure it could
>>> handle a lot of traffic.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Joe Smith <ya...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Aurora ran into an issue where it could not build on OS X 10.10
>>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-867>, and we didn't get
>>>> much clarity on the filed issue on github
>>>> <https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/issues/690>.
>>>>
>>>> I've sent out a review for Aurora <https://reviews.apache.org/r/27066/>
>>>> to use https://pantsbuild.github.io/binaries/build-support- does that
>>>> sound reasonable? If that's going to be ~stable for the foreseeable future
>>>> then that'd be awesome, but I don't want to force a public artifact store
>>>> on you guys if that's not its purpose.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> Joe
>>>>
>>> ​
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: pants_support_baseurls

[Joe Smith <ya...@gmail.com>]

Aha- that's awesome. Cool, I'll move to that instead (and remove our TODO
for you :)

Thanks John!

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 2:02 PM, John Sirois <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I just setup a bintray account and a little publish script so we have a
> more stable serving system for these things.
> I need to doc this a bit for pants maintainers and users alike, but
> thought you might like to try it out.
> Artifacts are here: http://dl.bintray.com/pantsbuild/bin
> Publish script is here:
> https://github.com/pantsbuild/binaries/blob/gh-pages/sync-bintray.sh
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Eric Ayers <zu...@squareup.com> wrote:
>
>> At Square we have some binaries that we override, so we have an internal
>> site for those, and then we fall back to this URL for others.
>>
>> pants_support_baseurls = [
>>     'https://our-internal-machine/test-build-support',
>>     'https://pantsbuild.github.io/binaries/build-support',
>>   ]
>>
>> We have a comment to find a better solution. I’m not sure keeping
>> binaries in github is a great long term thing because I’m not sure it could
>> handle a lot of traffic.
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Joe Smith <ya...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Aurora ran into an issue where it could not build on OS X 10.10
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-867>, and we didn't get
>>> much clarity on the filed issue on github
>>> <https://github.com/pantsbuild/pants/issues/690>.
>>>
>>> I've sent out a review for Aurora <https://reviews.apache.org/r/27066/>
>>> to use https://pantsbuild.github.io/binaries/build-support- does that
>>> sound reasonable? If that's going to be ~stable for the foreseeable future
>>> then that'd be awesome, but I don't want to force a public artifact store
>>> on you guys if that's not its purpose.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Joe
>>>
>> ​
>>
>
>