You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@royale.apache.org by Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com> on 2018/01/27 15:12:33 UTC
Preparing code for demos and doc
I was looking at the tutorials and code samples we have available and think
pretty much everything needs to be reviewed and if necessary reworked so we
are showing for example <js:Label> instead of <s:Label>, and talking about
Royale instead of FlexJS in everything from text to directory names, to
avoid confusing or distracting readers. I am happy to do this with code
samples and documentation text, but the creators of demonstration apps
would be best positioned for that sort of migration.
For posted, running demonstration apps, I guess we have a little time for
that migration; but anything we point to by the time Royale is at the 1.0
release should probably be modeling what we want potential users to learn
to do.
That's my thinking, anyhow. Opinions?
a
--
Andrew Wetmore
http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
Re: Preparing code for demos and doc
Posted by Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>.
Oh, that is great news.
I guess I will approach authors of useful tutorials and other resources
directly, to see if they would consider a rebranding rewrite.
On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 2:26 PM, Gabe Harbs <ha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think I’ve confirmed that all the examples still work.
>
> They are now in a “royale” directory. The namespaces should all have been
> changed to royale as well.
>
> Harbs
>
> > On Jan 27, 2018, at 7:37 PM, Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Well, in Royale 0.8.0 the examples directory has a FlexJS directory with
> > about 30 examples. Is that directory name still okay now that the project
> > is no longer FlexJS?
> >
> > Within examples, flexjs lingers on in namespaces: xmlns:js="library://
> > ns.apache.org/flexjs/basic"
> >
> > But I was mainly thinking of lovely examples and tutorials like Josh's
> > "Hello FlexJS" [1]
> >
> > [1]
> > https://nextgenactionscript.com/tutorials/hello-flexjs-
> web-application-development-mxml-actionscript/
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Which examples were you looking at?
> >>
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>
> >> Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2018 7:12:33 AM
> >> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> >> Subject: Preparing code for demos and doc
> >>
> >> I was looking at the tutorials and code samples we have available and
> think
> >> pretty much everything needs to be reviewed and if necessary reworked
> so we
> >> are showing for example <js:Label> instead of <s:Label>, and talking
> about
> >> Royale instead of FlexJS in everything from text to directory names, to
> >> avoid confusing or distracting readers. I am happy to do this with code
> >> samples and documentation text, but the creators of demonstration apps
> >> would be best positioned for that sort of migration.
> >>
> >> For posted, running demonstration apps, I guess we have a little time
> for
> >> that migration; but anything we point to by the time Royale is at the
> 1.0
> >> release should probably be modeling what we want potential users to
> learn
> >> to do.
> >>
> >> That's my thinking, anyhow. Opinions?
> >>
> >> a
> >>
> >> --
> >> Andrew Wetmore
> >>
> >> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=
> http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.
> >> blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> >> 7C17ff22331cfd4e8c412e08d56598671e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> >> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636526627641548902&sdata=xVgkE3frhAlosWP35e8eq%
> >> 2BvUTAe3iKpGJDON%2F60x4KY%3D&reserved=0
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Andrew Wetmore
> >
> > http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
>
>
--
Andrew Wetmore
http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
Re: Preparing code for demos and doc
Posted by Gabe Harbs <ha...@gmail.com>.
I think I’ve confirmed that all the examples still work.
They are now in a “royale” directory. The namespaces should all have been changed to royale as well.
Harbs
> On Jan 27, 2018, at 7:37 PM, Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Well, in Royale 0.8.0 the examples directory has a FlexJS directory with
> about 30 examples. Is that directory name still okay now that the project
> is no longer FlexJS?
>
> Within examples, flexjs lingers on in namespaces: xmlns:js="library://
> ns.apache.org/flexjs/basic"
>
> But I was mainly thinking of lovely examples and tutorials like Josh's
> "Hello FlexJS" [1]
>
> [1]
> https://nextgenactionscript.com/tutorials/hello-flexjs-web-application-development-mxml-actionscript/
>
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> Which examples were you looking at?
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2018 7:12:33 AM
>> To: dev@royale.apache.org
>> Subject: Preparing code for demos and doc
>>
>> I was looking at the tutorials and code samples we have available and think
>> pretty much everything needs to be reviewed and if necessary reworked so we
>> are showing for example <js:Label> instead of <s:Label>, and talking about
>> Royale instead of FlexJS in everything from text to directory names, to
>> avoid confusing or distracting readers. I am happy to do this with code
>> samples and documentation text, but the creators of demonstration apps
>> would be best positioned for that sort of migration.
>>
>> For posted, running demonstration apps, I guess we have a little time for
>> that migration; but anything we point to by the time Royale is at the 1.0
>> release should probably be modeling what we want potential users to learn
>> to do.
>>
>> That's my thinking, anyhow. Opinions?
>>
>> a
>>
>> --
>> Andrew Wetmore
>>
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.
>> blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
>> 7C17ff22331cfd4e8c412e08d56598671e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
>> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636526627641548902&sdata=xVgkE3frhAlosWP35e8eq%
>> 2BvUTAe3iKpGJDON%2F60x4KY%3D&reserved=0
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
>
> http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
Re: Preparing code for demos and doc
Posted by Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>.
Well, in Royale 0.8.0 the examples directory has a FlexJS directory with
about 30 examples. Is that directory name still okay now that the project
is no longer FlexJS?
Within examples, flexjs lingers on in namespaces: xmlns:js="library://
ns.apache.org/flexjs/basic"
But I was mainly thinking of lovely examples and tutorials like Josh's
"Hello FlexJS" [1]
[1]
https://nextgenactionscript.com/tutorials/hello-flexjs-web-application-development-mxml-actionscript/
On Sat, Jan 27, 2018 at 11:38 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.invalid>
wrote:
> Which examples were you looking at?
>
> -Alex
>
> Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2018 7:12:33 AM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Preparing code for demos and doc
>
> I was looking at the tutorials and code samples we have available and think
> pretty much everything needs to be reviewed and if necessary reworked so we
> are showing for example <js:Label> instead of <s:Label>, and talking about
> Royale instead of FlexJS in everything from text to directory names, to
> avoid confusing or distracting readers. I am happy to do this with code
> samples and documentation text, but the creators of demonstration apps
> would be best positioned for that sort of migration.
>
> For posted, running demonstration apps, I guess we have a little time for
> that migration; but anything we point to by the time Royale is at the 1.0
> release should probably be modeling what we want potential users to learn
> to do.
>
> That's my thinking, anyhow. Opinions?
>
> a
>
> --
> Andrew Wetmore
>
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.
> blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%
> 7C17ff22331cfd4e8c412e08d56598671e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178de
> cee1%7C0%7C0%7C636526627641548902&sdata=xVgkE3frhAlosWP35e8eq%
> 2BvUTAe3iKpGJDON%2F60x4KY%3D&reserved=0
>
--
Andrew Wetmore
http://cottage14.blogspot.com/
Re: Preparing code for demos and doc
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
Which examples were you looking at?
-Alex
Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>
________________________________
From: Andrew Wetmore <co...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2018 7:12:33 AM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Preparing code for demos and doc
I was looking at the tutorials and code samples we have available and think
pretty much everything needs to be reviewed and if necessary reworked so we
are showing for example <js:Label> instead of <s:Label>, and talking about
Royale instead of FlexJS in everything from text to directory names, to
avoid confusing or distracting readers. I am happy to do this with code
samples and documentation text, but the creators of demonstration apps
would be best positioned for that sort of migration.
For posted, running demonstration apps, I guess we have a little time for
that migration; but anything we point to by the time Royale is at the 1.0
release should probably be modeling what we want potential users to learn
to do.
That's my thinking, anyhow. Opinions?
a
--
Andrew Wetmore
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fcottage14.blogspot.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C17ff22331cfd4e8c412e08d56598671e%7Cfa7b1b5a7b34438794aed2c178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636526627641548902&sdata=xVgkE3frhAlosWP35e8eq%2BvUTAe3iKpGJDON%2F60x4KY%3D&reserved=0