recruitment@

[Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>]

Methinks that the creation of recruitment@ was ill-advised...
Most new people are joining dev@ which makes recruitment@ look
like a dismal failure.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: recruitment@

[Marcus <ma...@wtnet.de>]

Am 10/21/2016 03:44 PM, schrieb Ariel Constenla-Haile:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 08:30:47AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Methinks that the creation of recruitment@ was ill-advised...
>> Most new people are joining dev@
>
> This might be because of the current documentation workflow:
> recruitment@ is listed in get-involved.mdtext, but this page may lead to
> the orientation modules, where the introduction to development says
> "Your first task is to subscribe to our Development mailing list.  You
> can subscribe by sending an email to
> dev-subscribe@openoffice.apache.org."
>
> May be we should replace dev@ with the recruitment@ in all the
> orientation pages.

right, I've changed some places where IMHO it makes sense. Let's see if 
the most users go over these pages and come then to recruitment@.

Marcus


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org

Re: recruitment@

[Ariel Constenla-Haile <ar...@apache.org>]

On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 08:30:47AM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Methinks that the creation of recruitment@ was ill-advised...
> Most new people are joining dev@

This might be because of the current documentation workflow:
recruitment@ is listed in get-involved.mdtext, but this page may lead to
the orientation modules, where the introduction to development says
"Your first task is to subscribe to our Development mailing list.  You
can subscribe by sending an email to
dev-subscribe@openoffice.apache.org."

May be we should replace dev@ with the recruitment@ in all the
orientation pages.


Regards
-- 
Ariel Constenla-Haile

Re: recruitment@

[Peter Kovacs <le...@gmail.com>]

The traffic on development was a barrier for me.
I did not consider recruitment, because I did not see it in the wiki
joining page.
Maybe if the recruitment section on the wiki is more generic and guides the
interested persons there first, it would be used more.
However because I want to develop I had to deal with the load sooner or
later.
Recruitment makes sense if people do not know where to start or what they
want.

Patricia Shanahan <pa...@acm.org> schrieb am Fr., 21. Okt. 2016, 15:01:

> On 10/21/2016 5:30 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > Methinks that the creation of recruitment@ was ill-advised...
> > Most new people are joining dev@ which makes recruitment@ look
> > like a dismal failure.
>
> With 20/20 hindsight, it does not seem to have been useful. The question
> was whether dev@'s high traffic level and mixture of issues was a
> barrier to joining.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
> --

Disclaimer: Diese Nachricht stammt aus einem Google Account. Ihre Antwort
wird in der Google Cloud Gespeichert und durch Google Algorythmen zwecks
werbeanaöysen gescannt. Es ist derzeit nicht auszuschließen das ihre
Nachricht auch durch einen NSA Mitarbeiter geprüft wird. Durch
kommunikation mit diesen Account stimmen Sie zu das ihre Mail, ihre
Kontaktdaten und die Termine die Sie mit mir vereinbaren online zu Google
konditionen in der Googlecloud gespeichert wird. Sollten sie dies nicht
wünschen kontaktieren sie mich bitte Umgehend um z.B. alternativen zu
verhandeln.

Re: recruitment@

[Patricia Shanahan <pa...@acm.org>]

On 10/21/2016 5:30 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Methinks that the creation of recruitment@ was ill-advised...
> Most new people are joining dev@ which makes recruitment@ look
> like a dismal failure.

With 20/20 hindsight, it does not seem to have been useful. The question 
was whether dev@'s high traffic level and mixture of issues was a 
barrier to joining.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org