You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@hop.apache.org by Israel Herraiz <ih...@google.com.INVALID> on 2022/06/22 16:51:17 UTC

Release 2.0 with cherry picked contributions?

Hi,

TL;DR: I am working on a blog post on using the Hop web container with
Cloud Dataflow, and having a "2.0.1" release of the Docker container would
help with that post.

Using the 2.0 Docker container of Hop web I found a couple of small issues
that prevented me from being able to use Cloud Dataflow with that container
image (HOP-3976 <https://github.com/apache/hop/pull/1523>, HOP-3977
<https://github.com/apache/hop/pull/1524>).

If I try with the 2.1-SNAPSHOT container, I have other problems (the main
UI does not load), and I cannot use Hop with Cloud Dataflow either.

I cherry-picked the commits of those pull requests linked above, applied
them on top of the release2.0.0 branch
<https://github.com/apache/hop/tree/release2.0.0>, and produced a custom
container, and it works fine. But I think that asking the blog post readers
to do a custom container will be too much (I want to focus on how easy is
to use Hop from a web browser :).

Would it be possible to have a "2.0.1" container released with those
commits so I can link it as the image to be used with my blog post?

Thanks.

Israel

Re: Release 2.0 with cherry picked contributions?

Posted by Israel Herraiz <ih...@google.com.INVALID>.

Thank you again!

On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 at 09:18, Hans Van Akelyen <ha...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Israel,
>
> I gave it the 2.0.1 tag and it's available on dockerhub now.
>
> Cheers,
> Hans
>
> On Mon, 4 Jul 2022 at 12:02, Israel Herraiz <ih...@google.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the fix! I have tested the image 2.10-SNAPSHOT (the
> latest
> > one right now, with hash
> > 621af392c473be283502cc80c7b747dac4244a245e2584c319b3f5a7bf3d52eb), and it
> > is working.
> >
> > If you could do the tag, I will point the blog post to that version.
> >
> > Thanks again!
> >
> > Israel
> >
> > On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 at 09:40, Hans Van Akelyen <
> hans.van.akelyen@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Israel,
> > >
> > > In the meantime we found and fixed the issue [1][2] on our master
> branch.
> > > When build #1025 [3] finishes you should be able to use 2.1.0-SNAPSHOT
> > > again.
> > > If you can then confirm everything is working again on your end I will
> > tag
> > > the docker image under a separate version so you can refer to that one
> to
> > > have a stable version for your blogpost.
> > >
> > > Kr,
> > > Hans
> > >
> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HOP-4015
> > > [2] https://github.com/apache/hop/pull/1549
> > > [3] https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Hop/job/Hop/job/master/
> > >
> > > On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 20:06, Bart Maertens <ba...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Israel, Hans,
> > > >
> > > > I've created a ticket [1] with the stack trace that is thrown in Hop
> > Web.
> > > > It looks like the error is thrown because a very basic class
> > > > like org.eclipse.swt.graphics.Color can't be found, even though the
> jar
> > > > containing it is available on the server.
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HOP-4015
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Bart
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 7:59 PM Hans Van Akelyen <
> > > > hans.van.akelyen@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Israel,
> > > > >
> > > > > short answer: I'm not a big fan of starting the release process for
> > a 2
> > > > > commit branch. We would need to do the vote, wait 72 hours and all
> > the
> > > > > other "paperwork".
> > > > >
> > > > > That being said, Dockerhub is not an official release channel so I
> > can
> > > > > create an image containing those 2 commits and freeze it for you
> > until
> > > we
> > > > > have everything sorted out in 2.1, then you can refer to this
> custom
> > > > image
> > > > > for your blogpost.
> > > > >
> > > > > Our 2.1-SNAPSHOT however should not have drifted off from 2.0 that
> > far
> > > > yet,
> > > > > so I am also interested in what is going on.
> > > > > Do you get any feedback in the log/browser or does the UI just not
> > > load?
> > > > > Then we can create a ticket to definitely get this sorted out
> before
> > we
> > > > > start our next release.
> > > > >
> > > > > Kr,
> > > > > Hans
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 18:52, Israel Herraiz
> <ihr@google.com.invalid
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > TL;DR: I am working on a blog post on using the Hop web container
> > > with
> > > > > > Cloud Dataflow, and having a "2.0.1" release of the Docker
> > container
> > > > > would
> > > > > > help with that post.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Using the 2.0 Docker container of Hop web I found a couple of
> small
> > > > > issues
> > > > > > that prevented me from being able to use Cloud Dataflow with that
> > > > > container
> > > > > > image (HOP-3976 <https://github.com/apache/hop/pull/1523>,
> > HOP-3977
> > > > > > <https://github.com/apache/hop/pull/1524>).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If I try with the 2.1-SNAPSHOT container, I have other problems
> > (the
> > > > main
> > > > > > UI does not load), and I cannot use Hop with Cloud Dataflow
> either.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I cherry-picked the commits of those pull requests linked above,
> > > > applied
> > > > > > them on top of the release2.0.0 branch
> > > > > > <https://github.com/apache/hop/tree/release2.0.0>, and produced
> a
> > > > custom
> > > > > > container, and it works fine. But I think that asking the blog
> post
> > > > > readers
> > > > > > to do a custom container will be too much (I want to focus on how
> > > easy
> > > > is
> > > > > > to use Hop from a web browser :).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Would it be possible to have a "2.0.1" container released with
> > those
> > > > > > commits so I can link it as the image to be used with my blog
> post?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Israel
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Release 2.0 with cherry picked contributions?

Posted by Hans Van Akelyen <ha...@gmail.com>.

Hi Israel,

I gave it the 2.0.1 tag and it's available on dockerhub now.

Cheers,
Hans

On Mon, 4 Jul 2022 at 12:02, Israel Herraiz <ih...@google.com.invalid> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Thanks a lot for the fix! I have tested the image 2.10-SNAPSHOT (the latest
> one right now, with hash
> 621af392c473be283502cc80c7b747dac4244a245e2584c319b3f5a7bf3d52eb), and it
> is working.
>
> If you could do the tag, I will point the blog post to that version.
>
> Thanks again!
>
> Israel
>
> On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 at 09:40, Hans Van Akelyen <hans.van.akelyen@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Israel,
> >
> > In the meantime we found and fixed the issue [1][2] on our master branch.
> > When build #1025 [3] finishes you should be able to use 2.1.0-SNAPSHOT
> > again.
> > If you can then confirm everything is working again on your end I will
> tag
> > the docker image under a separate version so you can refer to that one to
> > have a stable version for your blogpost.
> >
> > Kr,
> > Hans
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HOP-4015
> > [2] https://github.com/apache/hop/pull/1549
> > [3] https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Hop/job/Hop/job/master/
> >
> > On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 20:06, Bart Maertens <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Israel, Hans,
> > >
> > > I've created a ticket [1] with the stack trace that is thrown in Hop
> Web.
> > > It looks like the error is thrown because a very basic class
> > > like org.eclipse.swt.graphics.Color can't be found, even though the jar
> > > containing it is available on the server.
> > >
> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HOP-4015
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Bart
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 7:59 PM Hans Van Akelyen <
> > > hans.van.akelyen@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Israel,
> > > >
> > > > short answer: I'm not a big fan of starting the release process for
> a 2
> > > > commit branch. We would need to do the vote, wait 72 hours and all
> the
> > > > other "paperwork".
> > > >
> > > > That being said, Dockerhub is not an official release channel so I
> can
> > > > create an image containing those 2 commits and freeze it for you
> until
> > we
> > > > have everything sorted out in 2.1, then you can refer to this custom
> > > image
> > > > for your blogpost.
> > > >
> > > > Our 2.1-SNAPSHOT however should not have drifted off from 2.0 that
> far
> > > yet,
> > > > so I am also interested in what is going on.
> > > > Do you get any feedback in the log/browser or does the UI just not
> > load?
> > > > Then we can create a ticket to definitely get this sorted out before
> we
> > > > start our next release.
> > > >
> > > > Kr,
> > > > Hans
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 18:52, Israel Herraiz <ihr@google.com.invalid
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > > TL;DR: I am working on a blog post on using the Hop web container
> > with
> > > > > Cloud Dataflow, and having a "2.0.1" release of the Docker
> container
> > > > would
> > > > > help with that post.
> > > > >
> > > > > Using the 2.0 Docker container of Hop web I found a couple of small
> > > > issues
> > > > > that prevented me from being able to use Cloud Dataflow with that
> > > > container
> > > > > image (HOP-3976 <https://github.com/apache/hop/pull/1523>,
> HOP-3977
> > > > > <https://github.com/apache/hop/pull/1524>).
> > > > >
> > > > > If I try with the 2.1-SNAPSHOT container, I have other problems
> (the
> > > main
> > > > > UI does not load), and I cannot use Hop with Cloud Dataflow either.
> > > > >
> > > > > I cherry-picked the commits of those pull requests linked above,
> > > applied
> > > > > them on top of the release2.0.0 branch
> > > > > <https://github.com/apache/hop/tree/release2.0.0>, and produced a
> > > custom
> > > > > container, and it works fine. But I think that asking the blog post
> > > > readers
> > > > > to do a custom container will be too much (I want to focus on how
> > easy
> > > is
> > > > > to use Hop from a web browser :).
> > > > >
> > > > > Would it be possible to have a "2.0.1" container released with
> those
> > > > > commits so I can link it as the image to be used with my blog post?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks.
> > > > >
> > > > > Israel
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Release 2.0 with cherry picked contributions?

Posted by Israel Herraiz <ih...@google.com.INVALID>.

Hi,

Thanks a lot for the fix! I have tested the image 2.10-SNAPSHOT (the latest
one right now, with hash
621af392c473be283502cc80c7b747dac4244a245e2584c319b3f5a7bf3d52eb), and it
is working.

If you could do the tag, I will point the blog post to that version.

Thanks again!

Israel

On Thu, 23 Jun 2022 at 09:40, Hans Van Akelyen <ha...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Israel,
>
> In the meantime we found and fixed the issue [1][2] on our master branch.
> When build #1025 [3] finishes you should be able to use 2.1.0-SNAPSHOT
> again.
> If you can then confirm everything is working again on your end I will tag
> the docker image under a separate version so you can refer to that one to
> have a stable version for your blogpost.
>
> Kr,
> Hans
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HOP-4015
> [2] https://github.com/apache/hop/pull/1549
> [3] https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Hop/job/Hop/job/master/
>
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 20:06, Bart Maertens <ba...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Israel, Hans,
> >
> > I've created a ticket [1] with the stack trace that is thrown in Hop Web.
> > It looks like the error is thrown because a very basic class
> > like org.eclipse.swt.graphics.Color can't be found, even though the jar
> > containing it is available on the server.
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HOP-4015
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bart
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 7:59 PM Hans Van Akelyen <
> > hans.van.akelyen@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Israel,
> > >
> > > short answer: I'm not a big fan of starting the release process for a 2
> > > commit branch. We would need to do the vote, wait 72 hours and all the
> > > other "paperwork".
> > >
> > > That being said, Dockerhub is not an official release channel so I can
> > > create an image containing those 2 commits and freeze it for you until
> we
> > > have everything sorted out in 2.1, then you can refer to this custom
> > image
> > > for your blogpost.
> > >
> > > Our 2.1-SNAPSHOT however should not have drifted off from 2.0 that far
> > yet,
> > > so I am also interested in what is going on.
> > > Do you get any feedback in the log/browser or does the UI just not
> load?
> > > Then we can create a ticket to definitely get this sorted out before we
> > > start our next release.
> > >
> > > Kr,
> > > Hans
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 18:52, Israel Herraiz <ih...@google.com.invalid>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > TL;DR: I am working on a blog post on using the Hop web container
> with
> > > > Cloud Dataflow, and having a "2.0.1" release of the Docker container
> > > would
> > > > help with that post.
> > > >
> > > > Using the 2.0 Docker container of Hop web I found a couple of small
> > > issues
> > > > that prevented me from being able to use Cloud Dataflow with that
> > > container
> > > > image (HOP-3976 <https://github.com/apache/hop/pull/1523>, HOP-3977
> > > > <https://github.com/apache/hop/pull/1524>).
> > > >
> > > > If I try with the 2.1-SNAPSHOT container, I have other problems (the
> > main
> > > > UI does not load), and I cannot use Hop with Cloud Dataflow either.
> > > >
> > > > I cherry-picked the commits of those pull requests linked above,
> > applied
> > > > them on top of the release2.0.0 branch
> > > > <https://github.com/apache/hop/tree/release2.0.0>, and produced a
> > custom
> > > > container, and it works fine. But I think that asking the blog post
> > > readers
> > > > to do a custom container will be too much (I want to focus on how
> easy
> > is
> > > > to use Hop from a web browser :).
> > > >
> > > > Would it be possible to have a "2.0.1" container released with those
> > > > commits so I can link it as the image to be used with my blog post?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > Israel
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: Release 2.0 with cherry picked contributions?

Posted by Hans Van Akelyen <ha...@gmail.com>.

Hi Israel,

In the meantime we found and fixed the issue [1][2] on our master branch.
When build #1025 [3] finishes you should be able to use 2.1.0-SNAPSHOT
again.
If you can then confirm everything is working again on your end I will tag
the docker image under a separate version so you can refer to that one to
have a stable version for your blogpost.

Kr,
Hans

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HOP-4015
[2] https://github.com/apache/hop/pull/1549
[3] https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Hop/job/Hop/job/master/

On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 20:06, Bart Maertens <ba...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Israel, Hans,
>
> I've created a ticket [1] with the stack trace that is thrown in Hop Web.
> It looks like the error is thrown because a very basic class
> like org.eclipse.swt.graphics.Color can't be found, even though the jar
> containing it is available on the server.
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HOP-4015
>
>
> Regards,
> Bart
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 7:59 PM Hans Van Akelyen <
> hans.van.akelyen@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Israel,
> >
> > short answer: I'm not a big fan of starting the release process for a 2
> > commit branch. We would need to do the vote, wait 72 hours and all the
> > other "paperwork".
> >
> > That being said, Dockerhub is not an official release channel so I can
> > create an image containing those 2 commits and freeze it for you until we
> > have everything sorted out in 2.1, then you can refer to this custom
> image
> > for your blogpost.
> >
> > Our 2.1-SNAPSHOT however should not have drifted off from 2.0 that far
> yet,
> > so I am also interested in what is going on.
> > Do you get any feedback in the log/browser or does the UI just not load?
> > Then we can create a ticket to definitely get this sorted out before we
> > start our next release.
> >
> > Kr,
> > Hans
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 18:52, Israel Herraiz <ih...@google.com.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > TL;DR: I am working on a blog post on using the Hop web container with
> > > Cloud Dataflow, and having a "2.0.1" release of the Docker container
> > would
> > > help with that post.
> > >
> > > Using the 2.0 Docker container of Hop web I found a couple of small
> > issues
> > > that prevented me from being able to use Cloud Dataflow with that
> > container
> > > image (HOP-3976 <https://github.com/apache/hop/pull/1523>, HOP-3977
> > > <https://github.com/apache/hop/pull/1524>).
> > >
> > > If I try with the 2.1-SNAPSHOT container, I have other problems (the
> main
> > > UI does not load), and I cannot use Hop with Cloud Dataflow either.
> > >
> > > I cherry-picked the commits of those pull requests linked above,
> applied
> > > them on top of the release2.0.0 branch
> > > <https://github.com/apache/hop/tree/release2.0.0>, and produced a
> custom
> > > container, and it works fine. But I think that asking the blog post
> > readers
> > > to do a custom container will be too much (I want to focus on how easy
> is
> > > to use Hop from a web browser :).
> > >
> > > Would it be possible to have a "2.0.1" container released with those
> > > commits so I can link it as the image to be used with my blog post?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Israel
> > >
> >
>

Re: Release 2.0 with cherry picked contributions?

Posted by Bart Maertens <ba...@apache.org>.

Hi Israel, Hans,

I've created a ticket [1] with the stack trace that is thrown in Hop Web.
It looks like the error is thrown because a very basic class
like org.eclipse.swt.graphics.Color can't be found, even though the jar
containing it is available on the server.

[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HOP-4015


Regards,
Bart



On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 7:59 PM Hans Van Akelyen <ha...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Israel,
>
> short answer: I'm not a big fan of starting the release process for a 2
> commit branch. We would need to do the vote, wait 72 hours and all the
> other "paperwork".
>
> That being said, Dockerhub is not an official release channel so I can
> create an image containing those 2 commits and freeze it for you until we
> have everything sorted out in 2.1, then you can refer to this custom image
> for your blogpost.
>
> Our 2.1-SNAPSHOT however should not have drifted off from 2.0 that far yet,
> so I am also interested in what is going on.
> Do you get any feedback in the log/browser or does the UI just not load?
> Then we can create a ticket to definitely get this sorted out before we
> start our next release.
>
> Kr,
> Hans
>
>
> On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 18:52, Israel Herraiz <ih...@google.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > TL;DR: I am working on a blog post on using the Hop web container with
> > Cloud Dataflow, and having a "2.0.1" release of the Docker container
> would
> > help with that post.
> >
> > Using the 2.0 Docker container of Hop web I found a couple of small
> issues
> > that prevented me from being able to use Cloud Dataflow with that
> container
> > image (HOP-3976 <https://github.com/apache/hop/pull/1523>, HOP-3977
> > <https://github.com/apache/hop/pull/1524>).
> >
> > If I try with the 2.1-SNAPSHOT container, I have other problems (the main
> > UI does not load), and I cannot use Hop with Cloud Dataflow either.
> >
> > I cherry-picked the commits of those pull requests linked above, applied
> > them on top of the release2.0.0 branch
> > <https://github.com/apache/hop/tree/release2.0.0>, and produced a custom
> > container, and it works fine. But I think that asking the blog post
> readers
> > to do a custom container will be too much (I want to focus on how easy is
> > to use Hop from a web browser :).
> >
> > Would it be possible to have a "2.0.1" container released with those
> > commits so I can link it as the image to be used with my blog post?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Israel
> >
>

Re: Release 2.0 with cherry picked contributions?

Posted by Hans Van Akelyen <ha...@gmail.com>.

Hi Israel,

short answer: I'm not a big fan of starting the release process for a 2
commit branch. We would need to do the vote, wait 72 hours and all the
other "paperwork".

That being said, Dockerhub is not an official release channel so I can
create an image containing those 2 commits and freeze it for you until we
have everything sorted out in 2.1, then you can refer to this custom image
for your blogpost.

Our 2.1-SNAPSHOT however should not have drifted off from 2.0 that far yet,
so I am also interested in what is going on.
Do you get any feedback in the log/browser or does the UI just not load?
Then we can create a ticket to definitely get this sorted out before we
start our next release.

Kr,
Hans

On Wed, 22 Jun 2022 at 18:52, Israel Herraiz <ih...@google.com.invalid> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> TL;DR: I am working on a blog post on using the Hop web container with
> Cloud Dataflow, and having a "2.0.1" release of the Docker container would
> help with that post.
>
> Using the 2.0 Docker container of Hop web I found a couple of small issues
> that prevented me from being able to use Cloud Dataflow with that container
> image (HOP-3976 <https://github.com/apache/hop/pull/1523>, HOP-3977
> <https://github.com/apache/hop/pull/1524>).
>
> If I try with the 2.1-SNAPSHOT container, I have other problems (the main
> UI does not load), and I cannot use Hop with Cloud Dataflow either.
>
> I cherry-picked the commits of those pull requests linked above, applied
> them on top of the release2.0.0 branch
> <https://github.com/apache/hop/tree/release2.0.0>, and produced a custom
> container, and it works fine. But I think that asking the blog post readers
> to do a custom container will be too much (I want to focus on how easy is
> to use Hop from a web browser :).
>
> Would it be possible to have a "2.0.1" container released with those
> commits so I can link it as the image to be used with my blog post?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Israel
>