You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to cvs@httpd.apache.org by wr...@apache.org on 2006/06/09 22:47:02 UTC
svn commit: r413158 - /httpd/site/trunk/xdocs/download.xml
Author: wrowe
Date: Fri Jun 9 13:47:02 2006
New Revision: 413158
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=413158&view=rev
Log:
Note 2.2.2 was our 10 year celebration I believe, (just to put something
interesting front and center under that top announcement, and declare
this is the definative recommended version.)
Axe a paragraph from 1.3 - ask us no questions we will tell you no lies.
Modified:
httpd/site/trunk/xdocs/download.xml
Modified: httpd/site/trunk/xdocs/download.xml
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/site/trunk/xdocs/download.xml?rev=413158&r1=413157&r2=413158&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/site/trunk/xdocs/download.xml (original)
+++ httpd/site/trunk/xdocs/download.xml Fri Jun 9 13:47:02 2006
@@ -56,15 +56,19 @@
<section id="apache22"><title>Apache HTTP Server 2.2.2
is the best available version</title>
+<p>The Apache HTTP Project is pleased to announce the release of Apache HTTP
+Server version 2.2.2. This release represents over ten years of innovation
+by the project, and is recommended all previous releases!</p>
+
<p>For details see the <a
href="http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.2.html">Official
Announcement</a> and the <a
href="[preferred]/httpd/CHANGES_2.2">CHANGES_2.2</a> list.</p>
-<p>Apache 2.2 add-in modules are not compatible with Apache 2.0 or 1.3 modules.
+<p>Add-in modules for Apache 1.3 or 2.0 are not compatible with Apache 2.2.
If you are running third party add-in modules, you must obtain modules
compilied or updated for Apache 2.2 from that third party, before you
- attempt to upgrade from any previous version of Apache. Modules compiled
+ attempt to upgrade from these previous versions. Modules compiled
for Apache 2.2 should continue to work for all 2.2.x releases.</p>
<ul>
@@ -158,13 +162,10 @@
several regressions introduced in 1.3.35 that interfered with Include'ing
other configuration files from the main httpd.conf configuration file.</p>
-<p>For additional details, read the <a
-href="http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement1.3.html">Official
-Announcement</a>.</p>
-
-<p>The Apache 1.3 series is no longer under development. Releases
-are occasionally created to address security issues, or after a number
-of bugs are fixed. New features are not likely to be added to 1.3.</p>
+<p>For details see the <a
+ href="http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement1.3.html">Official
+ Announcement</a> and the <a
+ href="[preferred]/httpd/CHANGES_1.3">CHANGES_1.3</a> list.</p>
<p>Use the Apache 1.3.36 version only if you must use a third party module
that is not available as an Apache 2.x module. Modules compiled for Apache 2.x
Re: svn commit: r413158 - /httpd/site/trunk/xdocs/download.xml
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> On 06/09/2006 10:47 PM, wrote:
>
>>Author: wrowe
>>Date: Fri Jun 9 13:47:02 2006
>>New Revision: 413158
>>
>>URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=413158&view=rev
>>Log:
>>
>> Note 2.2.2 was our 10 year celebration I believe, (just to put something
>> interesting front and center under that top announcement, and declare
>> this is the definative recommended version.)
>
>
> Maybe nitpicking, but I think 2.2.0 was released exactly at the 10th anniversary.
> But of course 2.2.2 represents *over* 10 years of innovation, so the text is
> still fine :-).
True - I'm glad I didn't edit to say "2.2.2 celebrates" - I believe you were
(even if it's not an exact science dating these things, I believe that's what
we attributed 2.2.0 for ;-)
Re: svn commit: r413158 - /httpd/site/trunk/xdocs/download.xml
Posted by Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org>.
On 06/09/2006 10:47 PM, wrote:
> Author: wrowe
> Date: Fri Jun 9 13:47:02 2006
> New Revision: 413158
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=413158&view=rev
> Log:
>
> Note 2.2.2 was our 10 year celebration I believe, (just to put something
> interesting front and center under that top announcement, and declare
> this is the definative recommended version.)
Maybe nitpicking, but I think 2.2.0 was released exactly at the 10th anniversary.
But of course 2.2.2 represents *over* 10 years of innovation, so the text is
still fine :-).
Regards
Rüdiger