You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@beam.apache.org by Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com> on 2018/06/01 16:21:33 UTC
[VOTE] Use probot/stale to automatically manage stale pull requests
Hi all,
Following the discussion, please vote on the move to activate probot/stale
[3] to notify authors of stale PRs per current policy and then close them
after a 7 day grace period.
For more details, see:
- our stale PR policy [1]
- the discussion thread [2]
- Probot stale [3]
- BEAM ticket summarizing discussion [4]
- INFRA ticket to activate probot/stale [5]
- Example PR that would activate it [6]
Please vote:
[ ] +1, Approve that we activate probot/stale
[ ] -1, Do not approve (please provide specific comments)
Kenn
[1] https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#stale-pull-requests
[2]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bda552ea7073ca165aaf47034610afafe22d589e386525023d33609e@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
[3] https://github.com/probot/stale
[4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4423
[5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16589
[6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5532
[VOTE] [RESULT] Use probot/stale to automatically manage stale pull requests
Posted by Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com>.
This vote has passed with 17 approving votes (6 binding) and no
disapproving votes.
Alan - now we can go ahead and merge your config.
Kenn
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 2:12 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> +1
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 01/06/2018 18:21, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Following the discussion, please vote on the move to activate
> > probot/stale [3] to notify authors of stale PRs per current policy and
> > then close them after a 7 day grace period.
> >
> > For more details, see:
> >
> > - our stale PR policy [1]
> > - the discussion thread [2]
> > - Probot stale [3]
> > - BEAM ticket summarizing discussion [4]
> > - INFRA ticket to activate probot/stale [5]
> > - Example PR that would activate it [6]
> >
> > Please vote:
> > [ ] +1, Approve that we activate probot/stale
> > [ ] -1, Do not approve (please provide specific comments)
> >
> > Kenn
> >
> > [1] https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#stale-pull-requests
> > [2]
> >
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bda552ea7073ca165aaf47034610afafe22d589e386525023d33609e@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> > [3] https://github.com/probot/stale
> > [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4423
> > [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16589
> > [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5532
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
Re: [VOTE] Use probot/stale to automatically manage stale pull
requests
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
+1
Regards
JB
On 01/06/2018 18:21, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Following the discussion, please vote on the move to activate
> probot/stale [3] to notify authors of stale PRs per current policy and
> then close them after a 7 day grace period.
>
> For more details, see:
>
> - our stale PR policy [1]
> - the discussion thread [2]
> - Probot stale [3]
> - BEAM ticket summarizing discussion [4]
> - INFRA ticket to activate probot/stale [5]
> - Example PR that would activate it [6]
>
> Please vote:
> [ ] +1, Approve that we activate probot/stale
> [ ] -1, Do not approve (please provide specific comments)
>
> Kenn
>
> [1] https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#stale-pull-requests
> [2]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bda552ea7073ca165aaf47034610afafe22d589e386525023d33609e@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> [3] https://github.com/probot/stale
> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4423
> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16589
> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5532
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Re: [VOTE] Use probot/stale to automatically manage stale pull
requests
Posted by Alexey Romanenko <ar...@gmail.com>.
+1
> On 4 Jun 2018, at 10:03, Reuven Lax <re...@google.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018, 10:11 AM Etienne Chauchot <echauchot@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
> +1
> Etienne
> Le vendredi 01 juin 2018 à 17:58 -0700, Udi Meiri a écrit :
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 4:27 PM Lukasz Cwik <lcwik@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 2:53 PM Thomas Weise <thw@apache.org <ma...@apache.org>> wrote:
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Robert Bradshaw <robertwb@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:43 PM Andrew Pilloud <apilloud@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:31 PM Huygaa Batsaikhan <batbat@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:17 PM Henning Rohde <herohde@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:16 AM Chamikara Jayalath <chamikara@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Cham
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:05 AM Kenneth Knowles <klk@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:54 AM Scott Wegner <swegner@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:39 AM Ahmet Altay <altay@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 9:32 AM Jason Kuster <jasonkuster@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding): automating policy ensures it is applied fairly and evenly and lessens the load on project maintainers; hearty agreement.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:25 AM Alan Myrvold <amyrvold@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) I updated the pull request to be 60 days (instead of 90) to match the contribute policy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:21 AM Kenneth Knowles <klk@google.com <ma...@google.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Following the discussion, please vote on the move to activate probot/stale [3] to notify authors of stale PRs per current policy and then close them after a 7 day grace period.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more details, see:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - our stale PR policy [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - the discussion thread [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Probot stale [3]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - BEAM ticket summarizing discussion [4]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - INFRA ticket to activate probot/stale [5]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Example PR that would activate it [6]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve that we activate probot/stale
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kenn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#stale-pull-requests <https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#stale-pull-requests>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bda552ea7073ca165aaf47034610afafe22d589e386525023d33609e@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E <https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bda552ea7073ca165aaf47034610afafe22d589e386525023d33609e@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/probot/stale <https://github.com/probot/stale>[4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4423 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4423>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16589 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16589>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5532 <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5532>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Use probot/stale to automatically manage stale pull requests
Posted by Reuven Lax <re...@google.com>.
+1
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018, 10:11 AM Etienne Chauchot <ec...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
> Etienne
> Le vendredi 01 juin 2018 à 17:58 -0700, Udi Meiri a écrit :
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 4:27 PM Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 2:53 PM Thomas Weise <th...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Robert Bradshaw <ro...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:43 PM Andrew Pilloud <ap...@google.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:31 PM Huygaa Batsaikhan <ba...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:17 PM Henning Rohde <he...@google.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:16 AM Chamikara Jayalath <ch...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding).
>
> Thanks,
> Cham
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:05 AM Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:54 AM Scott Wegner <sw...@google.com> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:39 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 9:32 AM Jason Kuster <ja...@google.com> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding): automating policy ensures it is applied fairly and
> evenly and lessens the load on project maintainers; hearty agreement.
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:25 AM Alan Myrvold <am...@google.com> wrote:
>
> +1 (non-binding) I updated the pull request to be 60 days (instead of 90)
> to match the contribute policy.
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:21 AM Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Following the discussion, please vote on the move to activate
> probot/stale [3] to notify authors of stale PRs per current policy and
> then close them after a 7 day grace period.
>
> For more details, see:
>
> - our stale PR policy [1]
> - the discussion thread [2]
> - Probot stale [3]
> - BEAM ticket summarizing discussion [4]
> - INFRA ticket to activate probot/stale [5]
> - Example PR that would activate it [6]
>
> Please vote:
> [ ] +1, Approve that we activate probot/stale
> [ ] -1, Do not approve (please provide specific comments)
>
> Kenn
>
> [1] https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#stale-pull-requests
> [2]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bda552ea7073ca165aaf47034610afafe22d589e386525023d33609e@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> [3] https://github.com/probot/stale
> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4423
> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16589
> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5532
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Use probot/stale to automatically manage stale pull
requests
Posted by Etienne Chauchot <ec...@apache.org>.
+1EtienneLe vendredi 01 juin 2018 à 17:58 -0700, Udi Meiri a écrit :
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 4:27 PM Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 2:53 PM Thomas Weise <th...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Robert Bradshaw <ro...@google.com> wrote:
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:43 PM Andrew Pilloud <ap...@google.com> wrote:
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:31 PM Huygaa Batsaikhan <ba...@google.com> wrote:
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:17 PM Henning Rohde <he...@google.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:16 AM Chamikara Jayalath <ch...@google.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Cham
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:05 AM Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:54 AM Scott Wegner <sw...@google.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:39 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > +1
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 9:32 AM Jason Kuster <ja...@google.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding): automating policy ensures it is applied fairly and evenly and lessens the load
> > > > > > > > > > > > on project maintainers; hearty agreement.
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:25 AM Alan Myrvold <am...@google.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 (non-binding) I updated the pull request to be 60 days (instead of 90) to match the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > contribute policy.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:21 AM Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Following the discussion, please vote on the move to activate probot/stale [3] to notify
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > authors of stale PRs per current policy and then close them after a 7 day grace period.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > For more details, see:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > - our stale PR policy [1]
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > - the discussion thread [2]
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Probot stale [3]
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > - BEAM ticket summarizing discussion [4]
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > - INFRA ticket to activate probot/stale [5]
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > - Example PR that would activate it [6]
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please vote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1, Approve that we activate probot/stale
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve (please provide specific comments)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kenn
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#stale-pull-requests
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bda552ea7073ca165aaf47034610afafe22d589e386525023d3
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3609e@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [3] https://github.com/probot/stale
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4423
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16589
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5532
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Use probot/stale to automatically manage stale pull requests
Posted by Udi Meiri <eh...@google.com>.
+1
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 4:27 PM Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 2:53 PM Thomas Weise <th...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Robert Bradshaw <ro...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:43 PM Andrew Pilloud <ap...@google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:31 PM Huygaa Batsaikhan <ba...@google.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:17 PM Henning Rohde <he...@google.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:16 AM Chamikara Jayalath <
>>>>>> chamikara@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Cham
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:05 AM Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:54 AM Scott Wegner <sw...@google.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:39 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 9:32 AM Jason Kuster <ja...@google.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding): automating policy ensures it is applied fairly
>>>>>>>>>>> and evenly and lessens the load on project maintainers; hearty agreement.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:25 AM Alan Myrvold <am...@google.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) I updated the pull request to be 60 days
>>>>>>>>>>>> (instead of 90) to match the contribute policy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:21 AM Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Following the discussion, please vote on the move to activate
>>>>>>>>>>>>> probot/stale [3] to notify authors of stale PRs per current
>>>>>>>>>>>>> policy and then close them after a 7 day grace period.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more details, see:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - our stale PR policy [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - the discussion thread [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Probot stale [3]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - BEAM ticket summarizing discussion [4]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - INFRA ticket to activate probot/stale [5]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> - Example PR that would activate it [6]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve that we activate probot/stale
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kenn
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#stale-pull-requests
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bda552ea7073ca165aaf47034610afafe22d589e386525023d33609e@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/probot/stale
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4423
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16589
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5532
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> -------
>>>>>>>>>>> Jason Kuster
>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> See something? Say something. go/jasonkuster-feedback
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://goto.google.com/jasonkuster-feedback>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Use probot/stale to automatically manage stale pull requests
Posted by Lukasz Cwik <lc...@google.com>.
+1
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 2:53 PM Thomas Weise <th...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Robert Bradshaw <ro...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:43 PM Andrew Pilloud <ap...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:31 PM Huygaa Batsaikhan <ba...@google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:17 PM Henning Rohde <he...@google.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:16 AM Chamikara Jayalath <
>>>>> chamikara@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (non-binding).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Cham
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:05 AM Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:54 AM Scott Wegner <sw...@google.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:39 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 9:32 AM Jason Kuster <ja...@google.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding): automating policy ensures it is applied fairly
>>>>>>>>>> and evenly and lessens the load on project maintainers; hearty agreement.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:25 AM Alan Myrvold <am...@google.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) I updated the pull request to be 60 days
>>>>>>>>>>> (instead of 90) to match the contribute policy.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:21 AM Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Following the discussion, please vote on the move to activate
>>>>>>>>>>>> probot/stale [3] to notify authors of stale PRs per current
>>>>>>>>>>>> policy and then close them after a 7 day grace period.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> For more details, see:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> - our stale PR policy [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>> - the discussion thread [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>> - Probot stale [3]
>>>>>>>>>>>> - BEAM ticket summarizing discussion [4]
>>>>>>>>>>>> - INFRA ticket to activate probot/stale [5]
>>>>>>>>>>>> - Example PR that would activate it [6]
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve that we activate probot/stale
>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Kenn
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#stale-pull-requests
>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bda552ea7073ca165aaf47034610afafe22d589e386525023d33609e@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/probot/stale
>>>>>>>>>>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4423
>>>>>>>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16589
>>>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5532
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> -------
>>>>>>>>>> Jason Kuster
>>>>>>>>>> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> See something? Say something. go/jasonkuster-feedback
>>>>>>>>>> <https://goto.google.com/jasonkuster-feedback>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Use probot/stale to automatically manage stale pull requests
Posted by Thomas Weise <th...@apache.org>.
+1
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Robert Bradshaw <ro...@google.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:43 PM Andrew Pilloud <ap...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:31 PM Huygaa Batsaikhan <ba...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:17 PM Henning Rohde <he...@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:16 AM Chamikara Jayalath <
>>>> chamikara@google.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (non-binding).
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Cham
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:05 AM Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:54 AM Scott Wegner <sw...@google.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:39 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 9:32 AM Jason Kuster <ja...@google.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding): automating policy ensures it is applied fairly
>>>>>>>>> and evenly and lessens the load on project maintainers; hearty agreement.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:25 AM Alan Myrvold <am...@google.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) I updated the pull request to be 60 days
>>>>>>>>>> (instead of 90) to match the contribute policy.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:21 AM Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Following the discussion, please vote on the move to activate
>>>>>>>>>>> probot/stale [3] to notify authors of stale PRs per current
>>>>>>>>>>> policy and then close them after a 7 day grace period.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> For more details, see:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> - our stale PR policy [1]
>>>>>>>>>>> - the discussion thread [2]
>>>>>>>>>>> - Probot stale [3]
>>>>>>>>>>> - BEAM ticket summarizing discussion [4]
>>>>>>>>>>> - INFRA ticket to activate probot/stale [5]
>>>>>>>>>>> - Example PR that would activate it [6]
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve that we activate probot/stale
>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Kenn
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#stale-pull-requests
>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/
>>>>>>>>>>> bda552ea7073ca165aaf47034610afafe22d589e386525023d33609e@%
>>>>>>>>>>> 3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/probot/stale
>>>>>>>>>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4423
>>>>>>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16589
>>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5532
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> -------
>>>>>>>>> Jason Kuster
>>>>>>>>> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> See something? Say something. go/jasonkuster-feedback
>>>>>>>>> <https://goto.google.com/jasonkuster-feedback>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Use probot/stale to automatically manage stale pull requests
Posted by Robert Bradshaw <ro...@google.com>.
+1
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:43 PM Andrew Pilloud <ap...@google.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:31 PM Huygaa Batsaikhan <ba...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:17 PM Henning Rohde <he...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:16 AM Chamikara Jayalath <ch...@google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Cham
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:05 AM Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:54 AM Scott Wegner <sw...@google.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:39 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 9:32 AM Jason Kuster <ja...@google.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding): automating policy ensures it is applied fairly
>>>>>>>> and evenly and lessens the load on project maintainers; hearty agreement.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:25 AM Alan Myrvold <am...@google.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) I updated the pull request to be 60 days (instead
>>>>>>>>> of 90) to match the contribute policy.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:21 AM Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Following the discussion, please vote on the move to activate
>>>>>>>>>> probot/stale [3] to notify authors of stale PRs per current
>>>>>>>>>> policy and then close them after a 7 day grace period.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> For more details, see:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - our stale PR policy [1]
>>>>>>>>>> - the discussion thread [2]
>>>>>>>>>> - Probot stale [3]
>>>>>>>>>> - BEAM ticket summarizing discussion [4]
>>>>>>>>>> - INFRA ticket to activate probot/stale [5]
>>>>>>>>>> - Example PR that would activate it [6]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve that we activate probot/stale
>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Kenn
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#stale-pull-requests
>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bda552ea7073ca165aaf47034610afafe22d589e386525023d33609e@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/probot/stale
>>>>>>>>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4423
>>>>>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16589
>>>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5532
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> -------
>>>>>>>> Jason Kuster
>>>>>>>> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> See something? Say something. go/jasonkuster-feedback
>>>>>>>> <https://goto.google.com/jasonkuster-feedback>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Use probot/stale to automatically manage stale pull requests
Posted by Andrew Pilloud <ap...@google.com>.
+1
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:31 PM Huygaa Batsaikhan <ba...@google.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:17 PM Henning Rohde <he...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:16 AM Chamikara Jayalath <ch...@google.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding).
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Cham
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:05 AM Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:54 AM Scott Wegner <sw...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:39 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 9:32 AM Jason Kuster <ja...@google.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding): automating policy ensures it is applied fairly and
>>>>>>> evenly and lessens the load on project maintainers; hearty agreement.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:25 AM Alan Myrvold <am...@google.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) I updated the pull request to be 60 days (instead
>>>>>>>> of 90) to match the contribute policy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:21 AM Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Following the discussion, please vote on the move to activate
>>>>>>>>> probot/stale [3] to notify authors of stale PRs per current
>>>>>>>>> policy and then close them after a 7 day grace period.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For more details, see:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - our stale PR policy [1]
>>>>>>>>> - the discussion thread [2]
>>>>>>>>> - Probot stale [3]
>>>>>>>>> - BEAM ticket summarizing discussion [4]
>>>>>>>>> - INFRA ticket to activate probot/stale [5]
>>>>>>>>> - Example PR that would activate it [6]
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve that we activate probot/stale
>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Kenn
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1] https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#stale-pull-requests
>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bda552ea7073ca165aaf47034610afafe22d589e386525023d33609e@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/probot/stale
>>>>>>>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4423
>>>>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16589
>>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5532
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> -------
>>>>>>> Jason Kuster
>>>>>>> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> See something? Say something. go/jasonkuster-feedback
>>>>>>> <https://goto.google.com/jasonkuster-feedback>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Use probot/stale to automatically manage stale pull requests
Posted by Huygaa Batsaikhan <ba...@google.com>.
+1
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:17 PM Henning Rohde <he...@google.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:16 AM Chamikara Jayalath <ch...@google.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Cham
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:05 AM Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:54 AM Scott Wegner <sw...@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:39 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 9:32 AM Jason Kuster <ja...@google.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (non-binding): automating policy ensures it is applied fairly and
>>>>>> evenly and lessens the load on project maintainers; hearty agreement.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:25 AM Alan Myrvold <am...@google.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) I updated the pull request to be 60 days (instead
>>>>>>> of 90) to match the contribute policy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:21 AM Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Following the discussion, please vote on the move to activate
>>>>>>>> probot/stale [3] to notify authors of stale PRs per current policy
>>>>>>>> and then close them after a 7 day grace period.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For more details, see:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - our stale PR policy [1]
>>>>>>>> - the discussion thread [2]
>>>>>>>> - Probot stale [3]
>>>>>>>> - BEAM ticket summarizing discussion [4]
>>>>>>>> - INFRA ticket to activate probot/stale [5]
>>>>>>>> - Example PR that would activate it [6]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve that we activate probot/stale
>>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Kenn
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1] https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#stale-pull-requests
>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bda552ea7073ca165aaf47034610afafe22d589e386525023d33609e@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/probot/stale
>>>>>>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4423
>>>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16589
>>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5532
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> -------
>>>>>> Jason Kuster
>>>>>> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See something? Say something. go/jasonkuster-feedback
>>>>>> <https://goto.google.com/jasonkuster-feedback>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Use probot/stale to automatically manage stale pull requests
Posted by Henning Rohde <he...@google.com>.
+1
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:16 AM Chamikara Jayalath <ch...@google.com>
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding).
>
> Thanks,
> Cham
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:05 AM Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:54 AM Scott Wegner <sw...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:39 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 9:32 AM Jason Kuster <ja...@google.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (non-binding): automating policy ensures it is applied fairly and
>>>>> evenly and lessens the load on project maintainers; hearty agreement.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:25 AM Alan Myrvold <am...@google.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (non-binding) I updated the pull request to be 60 days (instead of
>>>>>> 90) to match the contribute policy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:21 AM Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Following the discussion, please vote on the move to activate
>>>>>>> probot/stale [3] to notify authors of stale PRs per current policy
>>>>>>> and then close them after a 7 day grace period.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For more details, see:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - our stale PR policy [1]
>>>>>>> - the discussion thread [2]
>>>>>>> - Probot stale [3]
>>>>>>> - BEAM ticket summarizing discussion [4]
>>>>>>> - INFRA ticket to activate probot/stale [5]
>>>>>>> - Example PR that would activate it [6]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve that we activate probot/stale
>>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kenn
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#stale-pull-requests
>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bda552ea7073ca165aaf47034610afafe22d589e386525023d33609e@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/probot/stale
>>>>>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4423
>>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16589
>>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5532
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> -------
>>>>> Jason Kuster
>>>>> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
>>>>>
>>>>> See something? Say something. go/jasonkuster-feedback
>>>>> <https://goto.google.com/jasonkuster-feedback>
>>>>>
>>>>
Re: [VOTE] Use probot/stale to automatically manage stale pull requests
Posted by Chamikara Jayalath <ch...@google.com>.
+1 (non-binding).
Thanks,
Cham
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 10:05 AM Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:54 AM Scott Wegner <sw...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:39 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 9:32 AM Jason Kuster <ja...@google.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding): automating policy ensures it is applied fairly and
>>>> evenly and lessens the load on project maintainers; hearty agreement.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:25 AM Alan Myrvold <am...@google.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (non-binding) I updated the pull request to be 60 days (instead of
>>>>> 90) to match the contribute policy.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:21 AM Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Following the discussion, please vote on the move to activate
>>>>>> probot/stale [3] to notify authors of stale PRs per current policy
>>>>>> and then close them after a 7 day grace period.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For more details, see:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - our stale PR policy [1]
>>>>>> - the discussion thread [2]
>>>>>> - Probot stale [3]
>>>>>> - BEAM ticket summarizing discussion [4]
>>>>>> - INFRA ticket to activate probot/stale [5]
>>>>>> - Example PR that would activate it [6]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve that we activate probot/stale
>>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kenn
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#stale-pull-requests
>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bda552ea7073ca165aaf47034610afafe22d589e386525023d33609e@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/probot/stale
>>>>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4423
>>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16589
>>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5532
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> -------
>>>> Jason Kuster
>>>> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
>>>>
>>>> See something? Say something. go/jasonkuster-feedback
>>>> <https://goto.google.com/jasonkuster-feedback>
>>>>
>>>
Re: [VOTE] Use probot/stale to automatically manage stale pull requests
Posted by Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com>.
+1
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:54 AM Scott Wegner <sw...@google.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:39 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 9:32 AM Jason Kuster <ja...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding): automating policy ensures it is applied fairly and
>>> evenly and lessens the load on project maintainers; hearty agreement.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:25 AM Alan Myrvold <am...@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding) I updated the pull request to be 60 days (instead of
>>>> 90) to match the contribute policy.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:21 AM Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> Following the discussion, please vote on the move to activate
>>>>> probot/stale [3] to notify authors of stale PRs per current policy
>>>>> and then close them after a 7 day grace period.
>>>>>
>>>>> For more details, see:
>>>>>
>>>>> - our stale PR policy [1]
>>>>> - the discussion thread [2]
>>>>> - Probot stale [3]
>>>>> - BEAM ticket summarizing discussion [4]
>>>>> - INFRA ticket to activate probot/stale [5]
>>>>> - Example PR that would activate it [6]
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>> [ ] +1, Approve that we activate probot/stale
>>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>
>>>>> Kenn
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#stale-pull-requests
>>>>> [2]
>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bda552ea7073ca165aaf47034610afafe22d589e386525023d33609e@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>>>> [3] https://github.com/probot/stale
>>>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4423
>>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16589
>>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5532
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> -------
>>> Jason Kuster
>>> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
>>>
>>> See something? Say something. go/jasonkuster-feedback
>>> <https://goto.google.com/jasonkuster-feedback>
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Use probot/stale to automatically manage stale pull requests
Posted by Scott Wegner <sw...@google.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:39 AM Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 9:32 AM Jason Kuster <ja...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding): automating policy ensures it is applied fairly and
>> evenly and lessens the load on project maintainers; hearty agreement.
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:25 AM Alan Myrvold <am...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding) I updated the pull request to be 60 days (instead of
>>> 90) to match the contribute policy.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:21 AM Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> Following the discussion, please vote on the move to activate
>>>> probot/stale [3] to notify authors of stale PRs per current policy and
>>>> then close them after a 7 day grace period.
>>>>
>>>> For more details, see:
>>>>
>>>> - our stale PR policy [1]
>>>> - the discussion thread [2]
>>>> - Probot stale [3]
>>>> - BEAM ticket summarizing discussion [4]
>>>> - INFRA ticket to activate probot/stale [5]
>>>> - Example PR that would activate it [6]
>>>>
>>>> Please vote:
>>>> [ ] +1, Approve that we activate probot/stale
>>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve (please provide specific comments)
>>>>
>>>> Kenn
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#stale-pull-requests
>>>> [2]
>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bda552ea7073ca165aaf47034610afafe22d589e386525023d33609e@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>>> [3] https://github.com/probot/stale
>>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4423
>>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16589
>>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5532
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> -------
>> Jason Kuster
>> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
>>
>> See something? Say something. go/jasonkuster-feedback
>> <https://goto.google.com/jasonkuster-feedback>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Use probot/stale to automatically manage stale pull requests
Posted by Ahmet Altay <al...@google.com>.
+1
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018, 9:32 AM Jason Kuster <ja...@google.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding): automating policy ensures it is applied fairly and
> evenly and lessens the load on project maintainers; hearty agreement.
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:25 AM Alan Myrvold <am...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding) I updated the pull request to be 60 days (instead of 90)
>> to match the contribute policy.
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:21 AM Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Following the discussion, please vote on the move to activate
>>> probot/stale [3] to notify authors of stale PRs per current policy and
>>> then close them after a 7 day grace period.
>>>
>>> For more details, see:
>>>
>>> - our stale PR policy [1]
>>> - the discussion thread [2]
>>> - Probot stale [3]
>>> - BEAM ticket summarizing discussion [4]
>>> - INFRA ticket to activate probot/stale [5]
>>> - Example PR that would activate it [6]
>>>
>>> Please vote:
>>> [ ] +1, Approve that we activate probot/stale
>>> [ ] -1, Do not approve (please provide specific comments)
>>>
>>> Kenn
>>>
>>> [1] https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#stale-pull-requests
>>> [2]
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bda552ea7073ca165aaf47034610afafe22d589e386525023d33609e@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>>> [3] https://github.com/probot/stale
>>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4423
>>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16589
>>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5532
>>>
>>
>
> --
> -------
> Jason Kuster
> Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
>
> See something? Say something. go/jasonkuster-feedback
>
Re: [VOTE] Use probot/stale to automatically manage stale pull requests
Posted by Jason Kuster <ja...@google.com>.
+1 (non-binding): automating policy ensures it is applied fairly and evenly
and lessens the load on project maintainers; hearty agreement.
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:25 AM Alan Myrvold <am...@google.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding) I updated the pull request to be 60 days (instead of 90)
> to match the contribute policy.
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:21 AM Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Following the discussion, please vote on the move to activate
>> probot/stale [3] to notify authors of stale PRs per current policy and
>> then close them after a 7 day grace period.
>>
>> For more details, see:
>>
>> - our stale PR policy [1]
>> - the discussion thread [2]
>> - Probot stale [3]
>> - BEAM ticket summarizing discussion [4]
>> - INFRA ticket to activate probot/stale [5]
>> - Example PR that would activate it [6]
>>
>> Please vote:
>> [ ] +1, Approve that we activate probot/stale
>> [ ] -1, Do not approve (please provide specific comments)
>>
>> Kenn
>>
>> [1] https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#stale-pull-requests
>> [2]
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bda552ea7073ca165aaf47034610afafe22d589e386525023d33609e@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
>> [3] https://github.com/probot/stale
>> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4423
>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16589
>> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5532
>>
>
--
-------
Jason Kuster
Apache Beam / Google Cloud Dataflow
See something? Say something. go/jasonkuster-feedback
Re: [VOTE] Use probot/stale to automatically manage stale pull requests
Posted by Alan Myrvold <am...@google.com>.
+1 (non-binding) I updated the pull request to be 60 days (instead of 90)
to match the contribute policy.
On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 9:21 AM Kenneth Knowles <kl...@google.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Following the discussion, please vote on the move to activate
> probot/stale [3] to notify authors of stale PRs per current policy and
> then close them after a 7 day grace period.
>
> For more details, see:
>
> - our stale PR policy [1]
> - the discussion thread [2]
> - Probot stale [3]
> - BEAM ticket summarizing discussion [4]
> - INFRA ticket to activate probot/stale [5]
> - Example PR that would activate it [6]
>
> Please vote:
> [ ] +1, Approve that we activate probot/stale
> [ ] -1, Do not approve (please provide specific comments)
>
> Kenn
>
> [1] https://beam.apache.org/contribute/#stale-pull-requests
> [2]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/bda552ea7073ca165aaf47034610afafe22d589e386525023d33609e@%3Cdev.beam.apache.org%3E
> [3] https://github.com/probot/stale
> [4] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-4423
> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-16589
> [6] https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/5532
>