You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jdo-dev@db.apache.org by "Tilmann Zäschke (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/06/03 17:39:59 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (JDO-751) Support for Java8 Optional
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15314463#comment-15314463 ]
Tilmann Zäschke commented on JDO-751:
-------------------------------------
While writing the unit test, I came up with the following test cases for {{orElse}}:
{code:title=SupportedOptionalMethods.java|borderStyle=solid}
public void testOrElse() {
OptionalSample otherPC = new OptionalSample();
otherPC.setId(33);
String paramDecl = OptionalSample.class.getName() + " otherPCparam";
Object[] params = new Object[]{otherPC};
checkQuery("this.optionalPC.orElse(otherPCparam) == null", paramDecl, params,
new Object[]{});
checkQuery("this.optionalPC.orElse(otherPCparam) != otherPCparam", paramDecl, params,
new Object[]{oidPC});
paramDecl = "Date myDate, Date otherDate";
checkQuery("this.optionalDate.orElse(otherDate) == myDate", paramDecl,
new Object[]{DATE, DATE2},
new Object[]{oidPC});
paramDecl = "Date otherDate";
checkQuery("this.optionalString.orElse(otherDate) == otherDate", paramDecl,
new Object[]{oidNull, oidEmpty, oidDummyPC});
checkQuery("this.optionalString.orElse(12345) == " + INTEGER,
new Object[]{oidPC});
checkQuery("this.optionalString.orElse(12345) == 12345",
new Object[]{oidNull, oidEmpty, oidDummyPC});
paramDecl = String.class.getName() + " myString";
checkQuery("this.optionalString.orElse(`xyz`) == otherString", paramDecl,
new Object[]{STRING},
new Object[]{oidPC});
checkQuery("this.optionalString.orElse(`xyz`) == `xyz`",
new Object[]{oidNull, oidEmpty, oidDummyPC});
}
{code}
The main problem is that all of these tests seem somewhat artificial. Can anyone suggest some real-world cases for using {{orElse}} in queries? Otherwise it may make sense to drop support support for {{orElse}} for now, until we see a need.
> Support for Java8 Optional
> --------------------------
>
> Key: JDO-751
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-751
> Project: JDO
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: specification, tck
> Reporter: Andy Jefferson
> Fix For: JDO 3.2
>
> Attachments: JDO-751-tck-patch-v2.txt
>
>
> java.util.Optional provides a feature that is available in other languages. Since JDO 3.2 will be for Java8+ then it makes sense to add support for this as a "supported persistable type"
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)