You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@geode.apache.org by "ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/03/14 00:13:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (GEODE-4823) Indexes should not be updated on a
destroy if the old value is a TOMBSTONE
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-4823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16397886#comment-16397886 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on GEODE-4823:
--------------------------------------------------------
Commit 140118d066dc5da914d23eb79313148c3462721e in geode's branch refs/heads/develop from [~nabarunnag]
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=geode.git;h=140118d ]
GEODE-4823: OQL index not updated for tombstone (#1603)
* If the region entry is a tombstone then OQL indexes are not updated
* The operation extracted to a external method.
> Indexes should not be updated on a destroy if the old value is a TOMBSTONE
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GEODE-4823
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEODE-4823
> Project: Geode
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: querying
> Reporter: Jason Huynh
> Assignee: Jason Huynh
> Priority: Major
> Labels: pull-request-available
> Time Spent: 0.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> If a destroy operation is called but the old value is a TOMBSTONE, the index operation is a no op but certain indexes may spend cycles trying to locate the entry in the index.
>
> Instead we should short circuit and ignore an operation if the action is DESTROY and the old value is a TOMBSTONE
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)