You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to server-dev@james.apache.org by Norman Maurer <no...@apache.org> on 2010/02/24 21:27:10 UTC
JMS for spooling
Hi all,
I started to work on a JMS implementation for spooling in JAMES. Its
workin but still more a POC then anything else. Anyway I would like to
commit it to work on it in svn and do small commits. Because its not
stable yet and not production ready should I better use a sandbox and
merge it later ? or are the others ok with having some "in progress"
trunk ?
Bye,
Norman
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: JMS for spooling
Posted by Norman Maurer <no...@googlemail.com>.
Ok first version of JMS spooling is in trunk now.. Its far from
perfect performant-wise. But It shows the idea..
Bye,
Norman
2010/2/25 Norman Maurer <no...@googlemail.com>:
> true enough.. But let us first do the jms spooling.. then cut M1.
>
> I will start to commit changes to trunk then.
>
> Bye,
> Norman
>
> 2010/2/24 Stefano Bagnara <ap...@bago.org>:
>> 2010/2/24 Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@gmail.com>:
>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Norman Maurer <no...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I started to work on a JMS implementation for spooling in JAMES. Its
>>>> workin but still more a POC then anything else. Anyway I would like to
>>>> commit it to work on it in svn and do small commits. Because its not
>>>> stable yet and not production ready should I better use a sandbox and
>>>> merge it later ? or are the others ok with having some "in progress"
>>>> trunk ?
>>>
>>> i'm a big fan of making progress in trunk. even when 3 is production
>>> ready, i would much prefer to see trunk push ahead and take production
>>> branches off it.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Stefano
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
>>
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: JMS for spooling
Posted by Norman Maurer <no...@googlemail.com>.
true enough.. But let us first do the jms spooling.. then cut M1.
I will start to commit changes to trunk then.
Bye,
Norman
2010/2/24 Stefano Bagnara <ap...@bago.org>:
> 2010/2/24 Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@gmail.com>:
>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Norman Maurer <no...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I started to work on a JMS implementation for spooling in JAMES. Its
>>> workin but still more a POC then anything else. Anyway I would like to
>>> commit it to work on it in svn and do small commits. Because its not
>>> stable yet and not production ready should I better use a sandbox and
>>> merge it later ? or are the others ok with having some "in progress"
>>> trunk ?
>>
>> i'm a big fan of making progress in trunk. even when 3 is production
>> ready, i would much prefer to see trunk push ahead and take production
>> branches off it.
>
> +1
>
> Stefano
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: JMS for spooling
Posted by Stefano Bagnara <ap...@bago.org>.
2010/2/24 Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Norman Maurer <no...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I started to work on a JMS implementation for spooling in JAMES. Its
>> workin but still more a POC then anything else. Anyway I would like to
>> commit it to work on it in svn and do small commits. Because its not
>> stable yet and not production ready should I better use a sandbox and
>> merge it later ? or are the others ok with having some "in progress"
>> trunk ?
>
> i'm a big fan of making progress in trunk. even when 3 is production
> ready, i would much prefer to see trunk push ahead and take production
> branches off it.
+1
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: JMS for spooling
Posted by Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Norman Maurer <no...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I started to work on a JMS implementation for spooling in JAMES. Its
> workin but still more a POC then anything else. Anyway I would like to
> commit it to work on it in svn and do small commits. Because its not
> stable yet and not production ready should I better use a sandbox and
> merge it later ? or are the others ok with having some "in progress"
> trunk ?
i'm a big fan of making progress in trunk. even when 3 is production
ready, i would much prefer to see trunk push ahead and take production
branches off it.
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org