You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@xml.apache.org by Ed Staub <es...@mediaone.net> on 2000/08/17 04:27:22 UTC

Should we outsource the xml.apache.org site?

[Hopefully this won't tick off too many people...]

We (as a group) have been unable to patch or replace bugzilla since it was
taken down over three months ago.

We haven't had a working mail archive for four weeks.

I don't know what the problem is; all I know is that all the committers I've
corresponded with have written "Sorry, I can't do anything about it... we
don't have control".

We really need a functional infrastructure!!!

Does it make sense to outsource the site to, say, sourceforge.net?

-Ed Staub

Re: Should we outsource the xml.apache.org site?

Posted by Mike Pogue <mp...@apache.org>.
+1 for this idea.  It's been too long without bug tracking.

Ed Staub wrote:
> 
> [Hopefully this won't tick off too many people...]
> 
> We (as a group) have been unable to patch or replace bugzilla since it was
> taken down over three months ago.
> 
> We haven't had a working mail archive for four weeks.
> 
> I don't know what the problem is; all I know is that all the committers I've
> corresponded with have written "Sorry, I can't do anything about it... we
> don't have control".
> 
> We really need a functional infrastructure!!!
> 
> Does it make sense to outsource the site to, say, sourceforge.net?
> 
> -Ed Staub
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> In case of troubles, e-mail:     webmaster@xml.apache.org
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:          general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org

RE: Should we outsource the xml.apache.org site?

Posted by Sander van Zoest <sa...@covalent.net>.
On Thu, 17 Aug 2000, Ed Staub wrote:

> Sander,
> 
> I'll be very happy to see it!
> We've been having an extensive redesign discussion on the Xerces-J list over
> the last six weeks.
> Doing it without a collective "memory" has been difficult.
  
> Do you have an idea of when "shortly" is?

Well, I am pretty much debugging, but you know how that goes. After
I get through that, I think I will throw it up on a test server and
have it run there for a while. I do not know an exact time frame, since
it isn't totally all up to me, but we are getting there.

--
Sander van Zoest                                         [sander@covalent.net]
Covalent Technologies, Inc.                           http://www.covalent.net/
(415) 536-5218                                 http://www.vanzoest.com/sander/

RE: Should we outsource the xml.apache.org site?

Posted by Ed Staub <es...@mediaone.net>.
Sander,

I'll be very happy to see it!
We've been having an extensive redesign discussion on the Xerces-J list over
the last six weeks.
Doing it without a collective "memory" has been difficult.

Do you have an idea of when "shortly" is?

Thanks,
-Ed Staub

-----Original Message-----
From: Sander van Zoest [mailto:sander@covalent.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2000 1:27 AM
To: general@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: Should we outsource the xml.apache.org site?


On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Ed Staub wrote:

> We haven't had a working mail archive for four weeks.

I am currently putting finishing touches on an mailing archive for these
lists that should be available shortly. Dirk had already mentioned this
before, but I had to redesign some things, so therefore the delay.

My appologies,

--
Sander van Zoest
[sander@covalent.net]
Covalent Technologies, Inc.
http://www.covalent.net/
(415) 536-5218
http://www.vanzoest.com/sander/


---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail:     webmaster@xml.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail:          general-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@xml.apache.org

Re: Should we outsource the xml.apache.org site?

Posted by Sander van Zoest <sa...@covalent.net>.
On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Ed Staub wrote:

> We haven't had a working mail archive for four weeks.

I am currently putting finishing touches on an mailing archive for these
lists that should be available shortly. Dirk had already mentioned this
before, but I had to redesign some things, so therefore the delay.
  
My appologies,

--
Sander van Zoest                                         [sander@covalent.net]
Covalent Technologies, Inc.                           http://www.covalent.net/
(415) 536-5218                                 http://www.vanzoest.com/sander/