You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@tinkerpop.apache.org by Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com> on 2016/02/12 20:26:17 UTC

[DISCUSS] stale branches

After Daniel's script cleaned some dead branches up for us we're still left
with a few stale ones out there - I made some assumptions about who "owned"
these branches - not sure if I'm right:

TINKERPOP3-432 (kuppitz)
TINKERPOP3-781-local-aggregation-should-not-destroy-path (matt)
TINKERPOP3-872 (marko)
TINKERPOP3-951 (marko)
TINKERPOP3-1014 (marko)

Can these be deleted?

Re: [DISCUSS] stale branches

Posted by Daniel Kuppitz <me...@gremlin.guru>.

>
> TINKERPOP3-432 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-432>
> (kuppitz)


Should be kept. Maybe I start from scratch one day, but at the moment it's
not clear whether my current code changes can be used or not.

Cheers,
Daniel


On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Stephen Mallette <sp...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> After Daniel's script cleaned some dead branches up for us we're still left
> with a few stale ones out there - I made some assumptions about who "owned"
> these branches - not sure if I'm right:
>
> TINKERPOP3-432 (kuppitz)
> TINKERPOP3-781-local-aggregation-should-not-destroy-path (matt)
> TINKERPOP3-872 (marko)
> TINKERPOP3-951 (marko)
> TINKERPOP3-1014 (marko)
>
> Can these be deleted?
>