Jini.org Decision

[Luis Matta <le...@uol.com.br>]

I am re-sending this e-mail as a last change for an answer kind of thing :)
Please if you have any interess in Jini.org, help me decide wheter to lock
it for edition or not.

The site has served for at least 3 years only as a target to SPAMM, what
should be done? Should I lock it,
or does the community need it open?

Many Thanks
Luís

Re: Jini.org Decision

[Peter Firmstone <ji...@zeus.net.au>]

+1 Definitely lock it down, no new material has been added for a long time.

Peter.

Dan Creswell wrote:
> Lock it, it's the only way to retain any value that might be left.
>
> If we're not doing that, we should take it down....
>
> On 26 April 2011 12:54, Luis Matta <le...@uol.com.br> wrote:
>   
>> I am re-sending this e-mail as a last change for an answer kind of thing :)
>> Please if you have any interess in Jini.org, help me decide wheter to lock
>> it for edition or not.
>>
>> The site has served for at least 3 years only as a target to SPAMM, what
>> should be done? Should I lock it,
>> or does the community need it open?
>>
>> Many Thanks
>> Luís
>>
>>     
>
>   

Re: Jini.org Decision

[Peter Firmstone <ji...@zeus.net.au>]

+1 Definitely lock it down, no new material has been added for a long time.

Peter.

Dan Creswell wrote:
> Lock it, it's the only way to retain any value that might be left.
>
> If we're not doing that, we should take it down....
>
> On 26 April 2011 12:54, Luis Matta <le...@uol.com.br> wrote:
>   
>> I am re-sending this e-mail as a last change for an answer kind of thing :)
>> Please if you have any interess in Jini.org, help me decide wheter to lock
>> it for edition or not.
>>
>> The site has served for at least 3 years only as a target to SPAMM, what
>> should be done? Should I lock it,
>> or does the community need it open?
>>
>> Many Thanks
>> Luís
>>
>>     
>
>   

Re: Jini.org Decision

[Dan Creswell <da...@gmail.com>]

Lock it, it's the only way to retain any value that might be left.

If we're not doing that, we should take it down....

On 26 April 2011 12:54, Luis Matta <le...@uol.com.br> wrote:
> I am re-sending this e-mail as a last change for an answer kind of thing :)
> Please if you have any interess in Jini.org, help me decide wheter to lock
> it for edition or not.
>
> The site has served for at least 3 years only as a target to SPAMM, what
> should be done? Should I lock it,
> or does the community need it open?
>
> Many Thanks
> Luís
>

Re: Jini.org Decision

[Luis Matta <le...@uol.com.br>]

Thanks everybody for the replies.
I believe it is for the best (for now), I agree with Jeff (and with all the
other comments) and
I will try to make the mentioned changes after locking it down *.

Jeff, it was my pleasure giving the contribution I could. Thanks !


*: After all, the necessary material is already at the Apache River site.

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Jeff Ramsdale <je...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Luis,
>
> My opinion is there should be a prominent message on the site pointing
> to Apache River (and then lock it down). I know I've talked to some
> folks who don't recognize the good going on here because of the
> indirection. I would be in favor of reconstituting the site in the
> future if there can be a plan (and volunteers) to help with upkeep,
> but for now the reality is the effort is going into River proper (hard
> to complain about that).
>
> Also, I'd like to publicly thank you for your years of work in helping
> protect the site.
>
> -jeff
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Luis Matta <le...@uol.com.br> wrote:
> > I am re-sending this e-mail as a last change for an answer kind of thing
> :)
> > Please if you have any interess in Jini.org, help me decide wheter to
> lock
> > it for edition or not.
> >
> > The site has served for at least 3 years only as a target to SPAMM, what
> > should be done? Should I lock it,
> > or does the community need it open?
> >
> > Many Thanks
> > Luís
> >
>

Re: Jini.org Decision

[Jeff Ramsdale <je...@gmail.com>]

Luis,

My opinion is there should be a prominent message on the site pointing
to Apache River (and then lock it down). I know I've talked to some
folks who don't recognize the good going on here because of the
indirection. I would be in favor of reconstituting the site in the
future if there can be a plan (and volunteers) to help with upkeep,
but for now the reality is the effort is going into River proper (hard
to complain about that).

Also, I'd like to publicly thank you for your years of work in helping
protect the site.

-jeff

On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Luis Matta <le...@uol.com.br> wrote:
> I am re-sending this e-mail as a last change for an answer kind of thing :)
> Please if you have any interess in Jini.org, help me decide wheter to lock
> it for edition or not.
>
> The site has served for at least 3 years only as a target to SPAMM, what
> should be done? Should I lock it,
> or does the community need it open?
>
> Many Thanks
> Luís
>

Re: Jini.org Decision

[Dan Creswell <da...@gmail.com>]

Lock it, it's the only way to retain any value that might be left.

If we're not doing that, we should take it down....

On 26 April 2011 12:54, Luis Matta <le...@uol.com.br> wrote:
> I am re-sending this e-mail as a last change for an answer kind of thing :)
> Please if you have any interess in Jini.org, help me decide wheter to lock
> it for edition or not.
>
> The site has served for at least 3 years only as a target to SPAMM, what
> should be done? Should I lock it,
> or does the community need it open?
>
> Many Thanks
> Luís
>