You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com> on 2015/11/18 02:19:44 UTC

[VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

This build is revision: a2d4e82a5c399130070eebd74f5c01024c724312
https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/105

GIT Tag:

  release-tomee-7.0.0-M1

  git checkout -b tagged-tomee-7.0.0-M1 release-tomee-7.0.0-M1

Maven Repo:

  https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1069/

Binaries & Source:

  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1069/tomee-7.0.0-M1/

Legal:

  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1069/legal/archives.html

Vote will be open for 72 hours or as needed.
Everyone may vote for the benefit of all, but only binding votes will 
count - http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html.

-- 
   Andy Gumbrecht
   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
   http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.

dont get me wrong: I'm happy if anything is done on the remote resources
plugin to make it better (and I love the "more usable" idea and the
standard format). I'm just unhappy we say it is too hard to have 3 versions
depending the distribution.


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>

2015-12-01 17:03 GMT+01:00 Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>:

> Ah OK, now I get how you are thinking about this.
>
> I did not know users use the individual notice and license files to
> catalogue distribution contents. In that case we should create some kind of
> standard order and format in these files to make that easier for those
> users, and potentially make it better for the project.
>
> And when you say I said that webprofile depends on activemq you are not
> accurate in saying that, because I did not (you did). Maybe something to
> think about? Probably not.
>
> We'll just keep it the way it is then. :-X
>
> On 01/12/2015 16:45, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
>> when you say webprofile depends on activemq you are not accurate and can
>> trigger ambiguity and work for end users (security etc) which shouldnt
>> even
>> be thought about.
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>
>> 2015-12-01 16:29 GMT+01:00 Andy <an...@gmx.de>:
>>
>> It has nothing to do with being lazy, rather efficient.
>>> In what way exactly is one 7kb file compared to eighteen noisy?
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
>>> On 01/12/2015 15:58, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>
>>> 2015-12-01 15:55 GMT+01:00 Andy <an...@gmx.de>:
>>>>
>>>> Yes, the wording I suggested for the single notice reflects that TomEE
>>>> has
>>>>
>>>>> multiple distributions - That was the idea ;-)
>>>>> Then we can use 'one' and the 'same' notice file for each assy.
>>>>>
>>>>> The same principle can be used for the license file.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is not an issue including notices or licenses that are not part
>>>>> of
>>>>> a
>>>>> particular package, rather that licenses are missing.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> it is actually and even if we consider it is not it brings noise and
>>>>> bad
>>>>>
>>>> information in our deliveries so I'm really -1 to go this lazy way.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We really do not need all these individual license files.
>>>>
>>>>> On 01/12/2015 15:30, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-remote-resources-plugin/ should
>>>>>
>>>>>> be
>>>>>> responsible of it already.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>>>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2015-12-01 15:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Soto <as...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe Walkmod can help on this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> El dt., 1 des. 2015 a les 15:20, Romain Manni-Bucau (<
>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com>)
>>>>>>> va escriure:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We can surely share more - that said mvn plugin should do it by
>>>>>>> itself
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> but each distribution (tomee web, tomee plus, openejb) has different
>>>>>>>> jars
>>>>>>>> and then different notices so not sure we can reduce the number of
>>>>>>>> files
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> that said sharing the header template is a good idea. Also we have to
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> conform to apache standards to aggregate licenses in a single file
>>>>>>>> so
>>>>>>>> licenses dir is a potentially nice addition but not a replacement
>>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>>> current setup.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>>>>>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2015-12-01 15:14 GMT+01:00 Andy <an...@gmx.de>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cancelling.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We should take the opportunity to ensure these issues do not arise
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> future.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There are many notice & license files, but I think we should just
>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> for all with appropriate wording. Something like:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> NOTICE
>>>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>>>> Apache OpenEJB/TomEE
>>>>>>>>> Copyright 1999-2015 The Apache Software Foundation
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> =========================================================================
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       ==  NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4 d of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ==
>>>>>>>>>       ==  the Apache License, Version 2.0,
>>>>>>>>>     ==
>>>>>>>>>       ==  in this case for the Apache OpenEJB/TomEE distributions.
>>>>>>>>>     ==
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> =========================================================================
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       This product includes software developed by
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>       The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>       Please read the different LICENSE files present in the
>>>>>>>>> licenses
>>>>>>>>> directory of
>>>>>>>>>       this distribution.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Apache TomEE is distributed in several distinct packages. We thank
>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> developers of all the Software that help make up the Apache TomEE
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> distributions.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This distribution contains, or may contain software developed by
>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>> attributed
>>>>>>>>> to the following organizations and individuals:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> .......
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> One license file containing all potential licences that is used for
>>>>>>>>> assemblies.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Andy.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>      Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>>>>>>      https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>>     https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>    Andy Gumbrecht
>>>    https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>
>>>
>>>
> --
>   Andy Gumbrecht
>   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>   http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>.

Ah OK, now I get how you are thinking about this.

I did not know users use the individual notice and license files to 
catalogue distribution contents. In that case we should create some kind 
of standard order and format in these files to make that easier for 
those users, and potentially make it better for the project.

And when you say I said that webprofile depends on activemq you are not 
accurate in saying that, because I did not (you did). Maybe something to 
think about? Probably not.

We'll just keep it the way it is then. :-X

On 01/12/2015 16:45, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> when you say webprofile depends on activemq you are not accurate and can
> trigger ambiguity and work for end users (security etc) which shouldnt even
> be thought about.
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>
> 2015-12-01 16:29 GMT+01:00 Andy <an...@gmx.de>:
>
>> It has nothing to do with being lazy, rather efficient.
>> In what way exactly is one 7kb file compared to eighteen noisy?
>>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> On 01/12/2015 15:58, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>
>>> 2015-12-01 15:55 GMT+01:00 Andy <an...@gmx.de>:
>>>
>>> Yes, the wording I suggested for the single notice reflects that TomEE has
>>>> multiple distributions - That was the idea ;-)
>>>> Then we can use 'one' and the 'same' notice file for each assy.
>>>>
>>>> The same principle can be used for the license file.
>>>>
>>>> There is not an issue including notices or licenses that are not part of
>>>> a
>>>> particular package, rather that licenses are missing.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> it is actually and even if we consider it is not it brings noise and bad
>>> information in our deliveries so I'm really -1 to go this lazy way.
>>>
>>>
>>> We really do not need all these individual license files.
>>>> On 01/12/2015 15:30, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>>
>>>> https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-remote-resources-plugin/ should
>>>>> be
>>>>> responsible of it already.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2015-12-01 15:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Soto <as...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe Walkmod can help on this?
>>>>>
>>>>>> El dt., 1 des. 2015 a les 15:20, Romain Manni-Bucau (<
>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com>)
>>>>>> va escriure:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We can surely share more - that said mvn plugin should do it by itself
>>>>>> -
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> but each distribution (tomee web, tomee plus, openejb) has different
>>>>>>> jars
>>>>>>> and then different notices so not sure we can reduce the number of
>>>>>>> files
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -
>>>>>> that said sharing the header template is a good idea. Also we have to
>>>>>>> conform to apache standards to aggregate licenses in a single file so
>>>>>>> licenses dir is a potentially nice addition but not a replacement for
>>>>>>> current setup.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>>>>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2015-12-01 15:14 GMT+01:00 Andy <an...@gmx.de>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cancelling.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We should take the opportunity to ensure these issues do not arise in
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> future.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There are many notice & license files, but I think we should just
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>> for all with appropriate wording. Something like:
>>>>>>>> NOTICE
>>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>>> Apache OpenEJB/TomEE
>>>>>>>> Copyright 1999-2015 The Apache Software Foundation
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> =========================================================================
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       ==  NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4 d of
>>>>>>>> ==
>>>>>>>>       ==  the Apache License, Version 2.0,
>>>>>>>>     ==
>>>>>>>>       ==  in this case for the Apache OpenEJB/TomEE distributions.
>>>>>>>>     ==
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> =========================================================================
>>>>>>
>>>>>>       This product includes software developed by
>>>>>>>>       The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>       Please read the different LICENSE files present in the licenses
>>>>>>>> directory of
>>>>>>>>       this distribution.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Apache TomEE is distributed in several distinct packages. We thank
>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> developers of all the Software that help make up the Apache TomEE
>>>>>>>> distributions.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This distribution contains, or may contain software developed by and
>>>>>>>> attributed
>>>>>>>> to the following organizations and individuals:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> .......
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> One license file containing all potential licences that is used for
>>>>>>>> assemblies.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Andy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>      Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>>>>>      https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>     Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>     https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> --
>>    Andy Gumbrecht
>>    https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>
>>

-- 
   Andy Gumbrecht
   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
   http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.

when you say webprofile depends on activemq you are not accurate and can
trigger ambiguity and work for end users (security etc) which shouldnt even
be thought about.


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>

2015-12-01 16:29 GMT+01:00 Andy <an...@gmx.de>:

> It has nothing to do with being lazy, rather efficient.
> In what way exactly is one 7kb file compared to eighteen noisy?
>
> +1
>
>
> On 01/12/2015 15:58, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
>> 2015-12-01 15:55 GMT+01:00 Andy <an...@gmx.de>:
>>
>> Yes, the wording I suggested for the single notice reflects that TomEE has
>>> multiple distributions - That was the idea ;-)
>>> Then we can use 'one' and the 'same' notice file for each assy.
>>>
>>> The same principle can be used for the license file.
>>>
>>> There is not an issue including notices or licenses that are not part of
>>> a
>>> particular package, rather that licenses are missing.
>>>
>>>
>>> it is actually and even if we consider it is not it brings noise and bad
>> information in our deliveries so I'm really -1 to go this lazy way.
>>
>>
>> We really do not need all these individual license files.
>>>
>>> On 01/12/2015 15:30, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>
>>> https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-remote-resources-plugin/ should
>>>> be
>>>> responsible of it already.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>>>
>>>> 2015-12-01 15:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Soto <as...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>> Maybe Walkmod can help on this?
>>>>
>>>>> El dt., 1 des. 2015 a les 15:20, Romain Manni-Bucau (<
>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com>)
>>>>> va escriure:
>>>>>
>>>>> We can surely share more - that said mvn plugin should do it by itself
>>>>> -
>>>>>
>>>>>> but each distribution (tomee web, tomee plus, openejb) has different
>>>>>> jars
>>>>>> and then different notices so not sure we can reduce the number of
>>>>>> files
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -
>>>>>
>>>>> that said sharing the header template is a good idea. Also we have to
>>>>>> conform to apache standards to aggregate licenses in a single file so
>>>>>> licenses dir is a potentially nice addition but not a replacement for
>>>>>> current setup.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>>>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2015-12-01 15:14 GMT+01:00 Andy <an...@gmx.de>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cancelling.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We should take the opportunity to ensure these issues do not arise in
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>> future.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There are many notice & license files, but I think we should just
>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> one
>>>>>>
>>>>>> for all with appropriate wording. Something like:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> NOTICE
>>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>>> Apache OpenEJB/TomEE
>>>>>>> Copyright 1999-2015 The Apache Software Foundation
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> =========================================================================
>>>>>
>>>>>      ==  NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4 d of
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ==
>>>>>>>      ==  the Apache License, Version 2.0,
>>>>>>>    ==
>>>>>>>      ==  in this case for the Apache OpenEJB/TomEE distributions.
>>>>>>>    ==
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> =========================================================================
>>>>>
>>>>>      This product includes software developed by
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>      Please read the different LICENSE files present in the licenses
>>>>>>> directory of
>>>>>>>      this distribution.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Apache TomEE is distributed in several distinct packages. We thank
>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>
>>>>>> developers of all the Software that help make up the Apache TomEE
>>>>>>> distributions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This distribution contains, or may contain software developed by and
>>>>>>> attributed
>>>>>>> to the following organizations and individuals:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> .......
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> One license file containing all potential licences that is used for
>>>>>>> assemblies.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Andy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>     Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>>>>     https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>    Andy Gumbrecht
>>>    https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>
>>>
>>>
> --
>   Andy Gumbrecht
>   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>
>

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Andy <an...@gmx.de>.

It has nothing to do with being lazy, rather efficient.
In what way exactly is one 7kb file compared to eighteen noisy?

+1

On 01/12/2015 15:58, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> 2015-12-01 15:55 GMT+01:00 Andy <an...@gmx.de>:
>
>> Yes, the wording I suggested for the single notice reflects that TomEE has
>> multiple distributions - That was the idea ;-)
>> Then we can use 'one' and the 'same' notice file for each assy.
>>
>> The same principle can be used for the license file.
>>
>> There is not an issue including notices or licenses that are not part of a
>> particular package, rather that licenses are missing.
>>
>>
> it is actually and even if we consider it is not it brings noise and bad
> information in our deliveries so I'm really -1 to go this lazy way.
>
>
>> We really do not need all these individual license files.
>>
>> On 01/12/2015 15:30, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>
>>> https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-remote-resources-plugin/ should be
>>> responsible of it already.
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>>
>>> 2015-12-01 15:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Soto <as...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Maybe Walkmod can help on this?
>>>> El dt., 1 des. 2015 a les 15:20, Romain Manni-Bucau (<
>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com>)
>>>> va escriure:
>>>>
>>>> We can surely share more - that said mvn plugin should do it by itself -
>>>>> but each distribution (tomee web, tomee plus, openejb) has different
>>>>> jars
>>>>> and then different notices so not sure we can reduce the number of files
>>>>>
>>>> -
>>>>
>>>>> that said sharing the header template is a good idea. Also we have to
>>>>> conform to apache standards to aggregate licenses in a single file so
>>>>> licenses dir is a potentially nice addition but not a replacement for
>>>>> current setup.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2015-12-01 15:14 GMT+01:00 Andy <an...@gmx.de>:
>>>>>
>>>>> Cancelling.
>>>>>> We should take the opportunity to ensure these issues do not arise in
>>>>>>
>>>>> the
>>>>> future.
>>>>>> There are many notice & license files, but I think we should just have
>>>>>>
>>>>> one
>>>>>
>>>>>> for all with appropriate wording. Something like:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> NOTICE
>>>>>> ----------
>>>>>> Apache OpenEJB/TomEE
>>>>>> Copyright 1999-2015 The Apache Software Foundation
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> =========================================================================
>>>>
>>>>>      ==  NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4 d of
>>>>>> ==
>>>>>>      ==  the Apache License, Version 2.0,
>>>>>>    ==
>>>>>>      ==  in this case for the Apache OpenEJB/TomEE distributions.
>>>>>>    ==
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>> =========================================================================
>>>>
>>>>>      This product includes software developed by
>>>>>>      The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      Please read the different LICENSE files present in the licenses
>>>>>> directory of
>>>>>>      this distribution.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Apache TomEE is distributed in several distinct packages. We thank all
>>>>>>
>>>>> the
>>>>>
>>>>>> developers of all the Software that help make up the Apache TomEE
>>>>>> distributions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This distribution contains, or may contain software developed by and
>>>>>> attributed
>>>>>> to the following organizations and individuals:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> .......
>>>>>>
>>>>>> One license file containing all potential licences that is used for
>>>>>> assemblies.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>     Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>>>     https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>> --
>>    Andy Gumbrecht
>>    https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>
>>

-- 
   Andy Gumbrecht
   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.

2015-12-01 15:55 GMT+01:00 Andy <an...@gmx.de>:

> Yes, the wording I suggested for the single notice reflects that TomEE has
> multiple distributions - That was the idea ;-)
> Then we can use 'one' and the 'same' notice file for each assy.
>
> The same principle can be used for the license file.
>
> There is not an issue including notices or licenses that are not part of a
> particular package, rather that licenses are missing.
>
>
it is actually and even if we consider it is not it brings noise and bad
information in our deliveries so I'm really -1 to go this lazy way.


> We really do not need all these individual license files.
>
> On 01/12/2015 15:30, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
>> https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-remote-resources-plugin/ should be
>> responsible of it already.
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>
>> 2015-12-01 15:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Soto <as...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Maybe Walkmod can help on this?
>>>
>>> El dt., 1 des. 2015 a les 15:20, Romain Manni-Bucau (<
>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com>)
>>> va escriure:
>>>
>>> We can surely share more - that said mvn plugin should do it by itself -
>>>> but each distribution (tomee web, tomee plus, openejb) has different
>>>> jars
>>>> and then different notices so not sure we can reduce the number of files
>>>>
>>> -
>>>
>>>> that said sharing the header template is a good idea. Also we have to
>>>> conform to apache standards to aggregate licenses in a single file so
>>>> licenses dir is a potentially nice addition but not a replacement for
>>>> current setup.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>>>
>>>> 2015-12-01 15:14 GMT+01:00 Andy <an...@gmx.de>:
>>>>
>>>> Cancelling.
>>>>> We should take the opportunity to ensure these issues do not arise in
>>>>>
>>>> the
>>>
>>>> future.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are many notice & license files, but I think we should just have
>>>>>
>>>> one
>>>>
>>>>> for all with appropriate wording. Something like:
>>>>>
>>>>> NOTICE
>>>>> ----------
>>>>> Apache OpenEJB/TomEE
>>>>> Copyright 1999-2015 The Apache Software Foundation
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> =========================================================================
>>>
>>>>     ==  NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4 d of
>>>>> ==
>>>>>     ==  the Apache License, Version 2.0,
>>>>>   ==
>>>>>     ==  in this case for the Apache OpenEJB/TomEE distributions.
>>>>>   ==
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> =========================================================================
>>>
>>>>     This product includes software developed by
>>>>>     The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>>>>>
>>>>>     Please read the different LICENSE files present in the licenses
>>>>> directory of
>>>>>     this distribution.
>>>>>
>>>>> Apache TomEE is distributed in several distinct packages. We thank all
>>>>>
>>>> the
>>>>
>>>>> developers of all the Software that help make up the Apache TomEE
>>>>> distributions.
>>>>>
>>>>> This distribution contains, or may contain software developed by and
>>>>> attributed
>>>>> to the following organizations and individuals:
>>>>>
>>>>> .......
>>>>>
>>>>> One license file containing all potential licences that is used for
>>>>> assemblies.
>>>>>
>>>>> Andy.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>    Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>>    https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
> --
>   Andy Gumbrecht
>   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>
>

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Andy <an...@gmx.de>.

Yes, the wording I suggested for the single notice reflects that TomEE 
has multiple distributions - That was the idea ;-)
Then we can use 'one' and the 'same' notice file for each assy.

The same principle can be used for the license file.

There is not an issue including notices or licenses that are not part of 
a particular package, rather that licenses are missing.

We really do not need all these individual license files.

On 01/12/2015 15:30, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-remote-resources-plugin/ should be
> responsible of it already.
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>
> 2015-12-01 15:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Soto <as...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Maybe Walkmod can help on this?
>>
>> El dt., 1 des. 2015 a les 15:20, Romain Manni-Bucau (<
>> rmannibucau@gmail.com>)
>> va escriure:
>>
>>> We can surely share more - that said mvn plugin should do it by itself -
>>> but each distribution (tomee web, tomee plus, openejb) has different jars
>>> and then different notices so not sure we can reduce the number of files
>> -
>>> that said sharing the header template is a good idea. Also we have to
>>> conform to apache standards to aggregate licenses in a single file so
>>> licenses dir is a potentially nice addition but not a replacement for
>>> current setup.
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>>
>>> 2015-12-01 15:14 GMT+01:00 Andy <an...@gmx.de>:
>>>
>>>> Cancelling.
>>>> We should take the opportunity to ensure these issues do not arise in
>> the
>>>> future.
>>>>
>>>> There are many notice & license files, but I think we should just have
>>> one
>>>> for all with appropriate wording. Something like:
>>>>
>>>> NOTICE
>>>> ----------
>>>> Apache OpenEJB/TomEE
>>>> Copyright 1999-2015 The Apache Software Foundation
>>>>
>>>>
>> =========================================================================
>>>>     ==  NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4 d of
>>>> ==
>>>>     ==  the Apache License, Version 2.0,
>>>>   ==
>>>>     ==  in this case for the Apache OpenEJB/TomEE distributions.
>>>>   ==
>>>>
>> =========================================================================
>>>>     This product includes software developed by
>>>>     The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>>>>
>>>>     Please read the different LICENSE files present in the licenses
>>>> directory of
>>>>     this distribution.
>>>>
>>>> Apache TomEE is distributed in several distinct packages. We thank all
>>> the
>>>> developers of all the Software that help make up the Apache TomEE
>>>> distributions.
>>>>
>>>> This distribution contains, or may contain software developed by and
>>>> attributed
>>>> to the following organizations and individuals:
>>>>
>>>> .......
>>>>
>>>> One license file containing all potential licences that is used for
>>>> assemblies.
>>>>
>>>> Andy.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>    Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>    https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>>
>>>>

-- 
   Andy Gumbrecht
   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.

https://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-remote-resources-plugin/ should be
responsible of it already.


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>

2015-12-01 15:22 GMT+01:00 Alex Soto <as...@gmail.com>:

> Maybe Walkmod can help on this?
>
> El dt., 1 des. 2015 a les 15:20, Romain Manni-Bucau (<
> rmannibucau@gmail.com>)
> va escriure:
>
> > We can surely share more - that said mvn plugin should do it by itself -
> > but each distribution (tomee web, tomee plus, openejb) has different jars
> > and then different notices so not sure we can reduce the number of files
> -
> > that said sharing the header template is a good idea. Also we have to
> > conform to apache standards to aggregate licenses in a single file so
> > licenses dir is a potentially nice addition but not a replacement for
> > current setup.
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> >
> > 2015-12-01 15:14 GMT+01:00 Andy <an...@gmx.de>:
> >
> > > Cancelling.
> > > We should take the opportunity to ensure these issues do not arise in
> the
> > > future.
> > >
> > > There are many notice & license files, but I think we should just have
> > one
> > > for all with appropriate wording. Something like:
> > >
> > > NOTICE
> > > ----------
> > > Apache OpenEJB/TomEE
> > > Copyright 1999-2015 The Apache Software Foundation
> > >
> > >
> =========================================================================
> > >    ==  NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4 d of
> > > ==
> > >    ==  the Apache License, Version 2.0,
> > >  ==
> > >    ==  in this case for the Apache OpenEJB/TomEE distributions.
> > >  ==
> > >
> =========================================================================
> > >
> > >    This product includes software developed by
> > >    The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
> > >
> > >    Please read the different LICENSE files present in the licenses
> > > directory of
> > >    this distribution.
> > >
> > > Apache TomEE is distributed in several distinct packages. We thank all
> > the
> > > developers of all the Software that help make up the Apache TomEE
> > > distributions.
> > >
> > > This distribution contains, or may contain software developed by and
> > > attributed
> > > to the following organizations and individuals:
> > >
> > > .......
> > >
> > > One license file containing all potential licences that is used for
> > > assemblies.
> > >
> > > Andy.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >   Andy Gumbrecht
> > >   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Alex Soto <as...@gmail.com>.

Maybe Walkmod can help on this?

El dt., 1 des. 2015 a les 15:20, Romain Manni-Bucau (<rm...@gmail.com>)
va escriure:

> We can surely share more - that said mvn plugin should do it by itself -
> but each distribution (tomee web, tomee plus, openejb) has different jars
> and then different notices so not sure we can reduce the number of files -
> that said sharing the header template is a good idea. Also we have to
> conform to apache standards to aggregate licenses in a single file so
> licenses dir is a potentially nice addition but not a replacement for
> current setup.
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>
> 2015-12-01 15:14 GMT+01:00 Andy <an...@gmx.de>:
>
> > Cancelling.
> > We should take the opportunity to ensure these issues do not arise in the
> > future.
> >
> > There are many notice & license files, but I think we should just have
> one
> > for all with appropriate wording. Something like:
> >
> > NOTICE
> > ----------
> > Apache OpenEJB/TomEE
> > Copyright 1999-2015 The Apache Software Foundation
> >
> > =========================================================================
> >    ==  NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4 d of
> > ==
> >    ==  the Apache License, Version 2.0,
> >  ==
> >    ==  in this case for the Apache OpenEJB/TomEE distributions.
> >  ==
> > =========================================================================
> >
> >    This product includes software developed by
> >    The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
> >
> >    Please read the different LICENSE files present in the licenses
> > directory of
> >    this distribution.
> >
> > Apache TomEE is distributed in several distinct packages. We thank all
> the
> > developers of all the Software that help make up the Apache TomEE
> > distributions.
> >
> > This distribution contains, or may contain software developed by and
> > attributed
> > to the following organizations and individuals:
> >
> > .......
> >
> > One license file containing all potential licences that is used for
> > assemblies.
> >
> > Andy.
> >
> >
> > --
> >   Andy Gumbrecht
> >   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.

We can surely share more - that said mvn plugin should do it by itself -
but each distribution (tomee web, tomee plus, openejb) has different jars
and then different notices so not sure we can reduce the number of files -
that said sharing the header template is a good idea. Also we have to
conform to apache standards to aggregate licenses in a single file so
licenses dir is a potentially nice addition but not a replacement for
current setup.


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>

2015-12-01 15:14 GMT+01:00 Andy <an...@gmx.de>:

> Cancelling.
> We should take the opportunity to ensure these issues do not arise in the
> future.
>
> There are many notice & license files, but I think we should just have one
> for all with appropriate wording. Something like:
>
> NOTICE
> ----------
> Apache OpenEJB/TomEE
> Copyright 1999-2015 The Apache Software Foundation
>
> =========================================================================
>    ==  NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4 d of
> ==
>    ==  the Apache License, Version 2.0,
>  ==
>    ==  in this case for the Apache OpenEJB/TomEE distributions.
>  ==
> =========================================================================
>
>    This product includes software developed by
>    The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).
>
>    Please read the different LICENSE files present in the licenses
> directory of
>    this distribution.
>
> Apache TomEE is distributed in several distinct packages. We thank all the
> developers of all the Software that help make up the Apache TomEE
> distributions.
>
> This distribution contains, or may contain software developed by and
> attributed
> to the following organizations and individuals:
>
> .......
>
> One license file containing all potential licences that is used for
> assemblies.
>
> Andy.
>
>
> --
>   Andy Gumbrecht
>   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>
>

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>.

Andy,

If you open up the issues and fix them immediately I think it's good to let
the release go.
We can release an M2 next month instead.

Jean-Louis

--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>
wrote:

> I'll check now, if they are missing then it'll have to be a re-roll.
>
> Andy
>
>>
>> --
>>    Andy Gumbrecht
>>    https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>    http://www.tomitribe.com
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>.

I'll check now, if they are missing then it'll have to be a re-roll.

Andy
>
> -- 
>    Andy Gumbrecht
>    https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>    http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Andy <an...@gmx.de>.

Cancelling.
We should take the opportunity to ensure these issues do not arise in 
the future.

There are many notice & license files, but I think we should just have 
one for all with appropriate wording. Something like:

NOTICE
----------
Apache OpenEJB/TomEE
Copyright 1999-2015 The Apache Software Foundation

=========================================================================
    ==  NOTICE file corresponding to the section 4 d 
of                    ==
    ==  the Apache License, Version 
2.0,                                   ==
    ==  in this case for the Apache OpenEJB/TomEE 
distributions.           ==
=========================================================================

    This product includes software developed by
    The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/).

    Please read the different LICENSE files present in the licenses 
directory of
    this distribution.

Apache TomEE is distributed in several distinct packages. We thank all the
developers of all the Software that help make up the Apache TomEE 
distributions.

This distribution contains, or may contain software developed by and 
attributed
to the following organizations and individuals:

.......

One license file containing all potential licences that is used for 
assemblies.

Andy.

-- 
   Andy Gumbrecht
   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jg...@tomitribe.com>.

I feel bad, because it seems like I always bring these issues up. However,
I'm inclined to agree with Romain. I personally couldn't +1 a release with
a known issue in the licence/notice files. At the moment, I'm not 100% sure
these are an issue, hence why I'm asking. I think we should answer these
for sure, and if we're 100% sure we're good, then we can push on.

Jon

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Asm code needs to ow2 mention AFAIK. Release with broken licensing is
> tolerated for incubator if immediately fixed but not sure for TLP. I
> wouldnt do it but if too hard to roll a m2 with the fix we can probably go
> this way exceptionnally.
> Le 1 déc. 2015 14:18, "Andy" <an...@gmx.de> a écrit :
>
> > xbean-asm-shaded is dual licensed with an Apache 2.0 license, but I also
> > find the following references to the ASM license:
> >
> > \assembly\openejb-standalone\src\main\resources\LICENSE
> > \examples\LICENSE
> > \itests\openejb-itests-app\src\main\application\META-INF\LICENSE
> > \tomee\apache-tomee\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
> > \tomee\tomee-plume-webapp\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
> > \tomee\tomee-plus-webapp\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
> > \tomee\tomee-webapp\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
> > \utils\openejb-provisionning\src\main\legal\LICENSE
> >
> > Joda time is Apache 2.0: http://joda-time.sourceforge.net/license.html -
> > We are not shipping a 'Derivative Work' so the NOTICE mention is not
> > 'required', just courteous. We'll add it to the next release.
> >
> > Not sure what you mean with java-support OWasp?
> >
> > Andy.
> >
> > On 01/12/2015 11:52, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
> >
> >> I think it probably can.
> >>
> >> That said, I have the following queries with the LICENCE/NOTICE files:
> >>
> >> 1. ASM notice from xbean-asm-shaded looks like its missing
> >> 2. Joda time notice looks like its missing
> >> 3. Notice for java-support jar (reference to OWasp) looks like its
> >> missing.
> >>
> >> I'd be grateful if someone else could double check.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Jon
> >>
> >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> >> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Can we close the vote now?
> >>> It's been opened for more than 10 days now.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> >>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> >>> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> >>> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Here is my +1 Andy
> >>>>
> >>>> Thank you very much for your patience and hard work
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> >>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> >>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
> >>>> jgallimore@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Ditto. (I'll review tonight, not I have no patience) :-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jon
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Andy Gumbrecht <
> >>>>>
> >>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
> >>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have none, can you not tell I am about to explode? :-D
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 23 November 2015 at 17:15, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> >>>>>> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Same here. Built it and ran a couple of time, but still need the
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> legal
> >>>
> >>>> stuff.
> >>>>>>> Thanks Andy for you patience.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> >>>>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> >>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Looks good so far.
> >>>>>>>> Trying to review it in depth this evening.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> LieGrue,
> >>>>>>>> strub
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Am 23.11.2015 um 15:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> +1, thanks Andy for the hard work!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> side note: we should say we have some deps the main project
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> doesn't
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> build
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> in tags when it is the case (javaee-api, jcs here), thought to
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>
> >>>> vote
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> mail but then thought maybe in main README it would be better.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Just a
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> side
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> note before forgetting :).
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> >>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> >>>>>>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 2015-11-20 17:06 GMT+01:00 Alex Soto <as...@gmail.com>:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Do you need any kind of help on this in terms of downloading
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> something
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> clean environment and inspect something?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> El dv., 20 nov. 2015 a les 16:56, Romain Manni-Bucau (<
> >>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com>)
> >>>>>>>>>> va escriure:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hmm
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Maybe check we dont have git info in mvn artifacts otherwise
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> binaries
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> would
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> be wrong then. Anyone recalls?
> >>>>>>>>>>> Le 20 nov. 2015 07:55, "Andy Gumbrecht" <
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> a
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> écrit :
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Me too. so no idea where it's gone? - I'm going to delete it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> take
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> from the tomee-7.0.0-M1 branch again
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>   Andy Gumbrecht
> >>>>>>>>>>>>   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> >>>>>>>>>>>>   http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>>    Andy Gumbrecht
> >>>>>>    https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> >>>>>>    http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Jonathan Gallimore
> >>>>> http://twitter.com/jongallimore
> >>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> > --
> >   Andy Gumbrecht
> >   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> >
> >
>



-- 
Jonathan Gallimore
http://twitter.com/jongallimore
http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Andy <an...@gmx.de>.

Nope, not consistent. Vote is cancelled. Will re-roll tonight :-(

On 01/12/2015 17:06, Mark Struberg wrote:
> Is ASM and OW2 mentioned in the NOTICE somewhere? If so then all is fine.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>> Am 01.12.2015 um 14:35 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> --001a11c26650a124e50525d63c58
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>>
>> Asm code needs to ow2 mention AFAIK. Release with broken licensing is
>> tolerated for incubator if immediately fixed but not sure for TLP. I
>> wouldnt do it but if too hard to roll a m2 with the fix we can probably go
>> this way exceptionnally.
>> Le 1 d=C3=A9c. 2015 14:18, "Andy" <an...@gmx.de> a =C3=A9crit :
>>
>>> xbean-asm-shaded is dual licensed with an Apache 2.0 license, but I also
>>> find the following references to the ASM license:
>>>
>>> \assembly\openejb-standalone\src\main\resources\LICENSE
>>> \examples\LICENSE
>>> \itests\openejb-itests-app\src\main\application\META-INF\LICENSE
>>> \tomee\apache-tomee\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
>>> \tomee\tomee-plume-webapp\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
>>> \tomee\tomee-plus-webapp\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
>>> \tomee\tomee-webapp\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
>>> \utils\openejb-provisionning\src\main\legal\LICENSE
>>>
>>> Joda time is Apache 2.0: http://joda-time.sourceforge.net/license.html -
>>> We are not shipping a 'Derivative Work' so the NOTICE mention is not
>>> 'required', just courteous. We'll add it to the next release.
>>>
>>> Not sure what you mean with java-support OWasp?
>>>
>>> Andy.
>>>
>>> On 01/12/2015 11:52, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think it probably can.
>>>>
>>>> That said, I have the following queries with the LICENCE/NOTICE files:
>>>>
>>>> 1. ASM notice from xbean-asm-shaded looks like its missing
>>>> 2. Joda time notice looks like its missing
>>>> 3. Notice for java-support jar (reference to OWasp) looks like its
>>>> missing.
>>>>
>>>> I'd be grateful if someone else could double check.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Jon
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
>>>> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Can we close the vote now?
>>>>> It's been opened for more than 10 days now.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro
>>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
>>>>> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Here is my +1 Andy
>>>>>> Thank you very much for your patience and hard work
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro
>>>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
>>>>>> jgallimore@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ditto. (I'll review tonight, not I have no patience) :-)
>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> I have none, can you not tell I am about to explode? :-D
>>>>>>>> On 23 November 2015 at 17:15, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
>>>>>>>> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Same here. Built it and ran a couple of time, but still need the
>>>>>>>> legal
>>>>>> stuff.
>>>>>>>>> Thanks Andy for you patience.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro
>>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>>>>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Looks good so far.
>>>>>>>>>> Trying to review it in depth this evening.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 23.11.2015 um 15:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>> +1, thanks Andy for the hard work!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> side note: we should say we have some deps the main project
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>> in tags when it is the case (javaee-api, jcs here), thought to
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>> vote
>>>>>>>>> mail but then thought maybe in main README it would be better.
>>>>>>>>>> Just a
>>>>>>>> side
>>>>>>>>>>> note before forgetting :).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2015-11-20 17:06 GMT+01:00 Alex Soto <as...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Do you need any kind of help on this in terms of downloading
>>>>>>>>>>> something
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>> clean environment and inspect something?
>>>>>>>>>>>> El dv., 20 nov. 2015 a les 16:56, Romain Manni-Bucau (<
>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com>)
>>>>>>>>>>>> va escriure:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hmm
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe check we dont have git info in mvn artifacts otherwise
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries
>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be wrong then. Anyone recalls?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 20 nov. 2015 07:55, "Andy Gumbrecht" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> =C3=A9crit :
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Me too. so no idea where it's gone? - I'm going to delete it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>> take
>>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the tomee-7.0.0-M1 branch again
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>    Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>>>>>    https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>>>>>>    http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Jonathan Gallimore
>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/jongallimore
>>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>>   Andy Gumbrecht
>>>   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>
>>>
>> --001a11c266
>

-- 
   Andy Gumbrecht
   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.

Is ASM and OW2 mentioned in the NOTICE somewhere? If so then all is fine.

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 01.12.2015 um 14:35 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> 
> --001a11c26650a124e50525d63c58
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> Asm code needs to ow2 mention AFAIK. Release with broken licensing is
> tolerated for incubator if immediately fixed but not sure for TLP. I
> wouldnt do it but if too hard to roll a m2 with the fix we can probably go
> this way exceptionnally.
> Le 1 d=C3=A9c. 2015 14:18, "Andy" <an...@gmx.de> a =C3=A9crit :
> 
>> xbean-asm-shaded is dual licensed with an Apache 2.0 license, but I also
>> find the following references to the ASM license:
>> 
>> \assembly\openejb-standalone\src\main\resources\LICENSE
>> \examples\LICENSE
>> \itests\openejb-itests-app\src\main\application\META-INF\LICENSE
>> \tomee\apache-tomee\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
>> \tomee\tomee-plume-webapp\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
>> \tomee\tomee-plus-webapp\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
>> \tomee\tomee-webapp\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
>> \utils\openejb-provisionning\src\main\legal\LICENSE
>> 
>> Joda time is Apache 2.0: http://joda-time.sourceforge.net/license.html -
>> We are not shipping a 'Derivative Work' so the NOTICE mention is not
>> 'required', just courteous. We'll add it to the next release.
>> 
>> Not sure what you mean with java-support OWasp?
>> 
>> Andy.
>> 
>> On 01/12/2015 11:52, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>> 
>>> I think it probably can.
>>> 
>>> That said, I have the following queries with the LICENCE/NOTICE files:
>>> 
>>> 1. ASM notice from xbean-asm-shaded looks like its missing
>>> 2. Joda time notice looks like its missing
>>> 3. Notice for java-support jar (reference to OWasp) looks like its
>>> missing.
>>> 
>>> I'd be grateful if someone else could double check.
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> Jon
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
>>> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Can we close the vote now?
>>>> It's been opened for more than 10 days now.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro
>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
>>>> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Here is my +1 Andy
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thank you very much for your patience and hard work
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro
>>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
>>>>> jgallimore@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ditto. (I'll review tonight, not I have no patience) :-)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>> 
>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
>>>> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I have none, can you not tell I am about to explode? :-D
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 23 November 2015 at 17:15, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
>>>>>>> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Same here. Built it and ran a couple of time, but still need the
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> legal
>>>> 
>>>>> stuff.
>>>>>>>> Thanks Andy for you patience.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro
>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>>>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Looks good so far.
>>>>>>>>> Trying to review it in depth this evening.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Am 23.11.2015 um 15:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> +1, thanks Andy for the hard work!
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> side note: we should say we have some deps the main project
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> in tags when it is the case (javaee-api, jcs here), thought to
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>> 
>>>>> vote
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> mail but then thought maybe in main README it would be better.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Just a
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> side
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> note before forgetting :).
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 2015-11-20 17:06 GMT+01:00 Alex Soto <as...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Do you need any kind of help on this in terms of downloading
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> something
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> clean environment and inspect something?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> El dv., 20 nov. 2015 a les 16:56, Romain Manni-Bucau (<
>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com>)
>>>>>>>>>>> va escriure:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Hmm
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe check we dont have git info in mvn artifacts otherwise
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> binaries
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> be wrong then. Anyone recalls?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Le 20 nov. 2015 07:55, "Andy Gumbrecht" <
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> =C3=A9crit :
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Me too. so no idea where it's gone? - I'm going to delete it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> take
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> from the tomee-7.0.0-M1 branch again
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>   Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>>>>   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>>>>>   http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jonathan Gallimore
>>>>>> http://twitter.com/jongallimore
>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> --
>>  Andy Gumbrecht
>>  https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>> 
>> 
> 
> --001a11c266

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.

Asm code needs to ow2 mention AFAIK. Release with broken licensing is
tolerated for incubator if immediately fixed but not sure for TLP. I
wouldnt do it but if too hard to roll a m2 with the fix we can probably go
this way exceptionnally.
Le 1 déc. 2015 14:18, "Andy" <an...@gmx.de> a écrit :

> xbean-asm-shaded is dual licensed with an Apache 2.0 license, but I also
> find the following references to the ASM license:
>
> \assembly\openejb-standalone\src\main\resources\LICENSE
> \examples\LICENSE
> \itests\openejb-itests-app\src\main\application\META-INF\LICENSE
> \tomee\apache-tomee\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
> \tomee\tomee-plume-webapp\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
> \tomee\tomee-plus-webapp\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
> \tomee\tomee-webapp\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
> \utils\openejb-provisionning\src\main\legal\LICENSE
>
> Joda time is Apache 2.0: http://joda-time.sourceforge.net/license.html -
> We are not shipping a 'Derivative Work' so the NOTICE mention is not
> 'required', just courteous. We'll add it to the next release.
>
> Not sure what you mean with java-support OWasp?
>
> Andy.
>
> On 01/12/2015 11:52, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>
>> I think it probably can.
>>
>> That said, I have the following queries with the LICENCE/NOTICE files:
>>
>> 1. ASM notice from xbean-asm-shaded looks like its missing
>> 2. Joda time notice looks like its missing
>> 3. Notice for java-support jar (reference to OWasp) looks like its
>> missing.
>>
>> I'd be grateful if someone else could double check.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Jon
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
>> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>
>> Can we close the vote now?
>>> It's been opened for more than 10 days now.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro
>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
>>> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Here is my +1 Andy
>>>>
>>>> Thank you very much for your patience and hard work
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro
>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
>>>> jgallimore@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ditto. (I'll review tonight, not I have no patience) :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Jon
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>
>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I have none, can you not tell I am about to explode? :-D
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 23 November 2015 at 17:15, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
>>>>>> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Same here. Built it and ran a couple of time, but still need the
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> legal
>>>
>>>> stuff.
>>>>>>> Thanks Andy for you patience.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro
>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Looks good so far.
>>>>>>>> Trying to review it in depth this evening.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 23.11.2015 um 15:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1, thanks Andy for the hard work!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> side note: we should say we have some deps the main project
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>
>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> in tags when it is the case (javaee-api, jcs here), thought to
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> the
>>>
>>>> vote
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> mail but then thought maybe in main README it would be better.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Just a
>>>>>
>>>>>> side
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> note before forgetting :).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>>>>>>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2015-11-20 17:06 GMT+01:00 Alex Soto <as...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you need any kind of help on this in terms of downloading
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> something
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> clean environment and inspect something?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> El dv., 20 nov. 2015 a les 16:56, Romain Manni-Bucau (<
>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com>)
>>>>>>>>>> va escriure:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hmm
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe check we dont have git info in mvn artifacts otherwise
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> binaries
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> be wrong then. Anyone recalls?
>>>>>>>>>>> Le 20 nov. 2015 07:55, "Andy Gumbrecht" <
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>> a
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Me too. so no idea where it's gone? - I'm going to delete it
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>
>>>>>> take
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> from the tomee-7.0.0-M1 branch again
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>>>>>>>>>   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>>>>>>>>>>   http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>    Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>>>    https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>>>>    http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jonathan Gallimore
>>>>> http://twitter.com/jongallimore
>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
> --
>   Andy Gumbrecht
>   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>
>

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jg...@tomitribe.com>.

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Andy <an...@gmx.de> wrote:

> xbean-asm-shaded is dual licensed with an Apache 2.0 license, but I also
> find the following references to the ASM license:
>
> \assembly\openejb-standalone\src\main\resources\LICENSE
> \examples\LICENSE
> \itests\openejb-itests-app\src\main\application\META-INF\LICENSE
> \tomee\apache-tomee\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
> \tomee\tomee-plume-webapp\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
> \tomee\tomee-plus-webapp\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
> \tomee\tomee-webapp\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
> \utils\openejb-provisionning\src\main\legal\LICENSE
>

It was actually a missing NOTICE:

This product includes software developed at
OW2 Consortium (http://asm.ow2.org/)

Its not in the TomEE+ binary at the very least.


>
> Joda time is Apache 2.0: http://joda-time.sourceforge.net/license.html -
> We are not shipping a 'Derivative Work' so the NOTICE mention is not
> 'required', just courteous. We'll add it to the next release.
>
> Not sure what you mean with java-support OWasp?
>

The java-support jar is this library:
https://git.shibboleth.net/view/?p=java-support.git;a=summary

I had to dig around, but I think that this notice should be present:

https://git.shibboleth.net/view/?p=java-support.git;a=blob_plain;f=doc/NOTICE.txt;hb=HEAD

Jon

-- 
Jonathan Gallimore
http://twitter.com/jongallimore
http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Andy <an...@gmx.de>.

xbean-asm-shaded is dual licensed with an Apache 2.0 license, but I also find the following references to the ASM license:

\assembly\openejb-standalone\src\main\resources\LICENSE
\examples\LICENSE
\itests\openejb-itests-app\src\main\application\META-INF\LICENSE
\tomee\apache-tomee\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
\tomee\tomee-plume-webapp\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
\tomee\tomee-plus-webapp\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
\tomee\tomee-webapp\src\main\resources\META-INF\LICENSE
\utils\openejb-provisionning\src\main\legal\LICENSE

Joda time is Apache 2.0: http://joda-time.sourceforge.net/license.html - We are not shipping a 'Derivative Work' so the NOTICE mention is not 'required', just courteous. We'll add it to the next release.

Not sure what you mean with java-support OWasp?

Andy.

On 01/12/2015 11:52, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
> I think it probably can.
>
> That said, I have the following queries with the LICENCE/NOTICE files:
>
> 1. ASM notice from xbean-asm-shaded looks like its missing
> 2. Joda time notice looks like its missing
> 3. Notice for java-support jar (reference to OWasp) looks like its missing.
>
> I'd be grateful if someone else could double check.
>
> Thanks
>
> Jon
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>
>> Can we close the vote now?
>> It's been opened for more than 10 days now.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Louis Monteiro
>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
>> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Here is my +1 Andy
>>>
>>> Thank you very much for your patience and hard work
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro
>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
>>> jgallimore@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ditto. (I'll review tonight, not I have no patience) :-)
>>>>
>>>> Jon
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Andy Gumbrecht <
>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have none, can you not tell I am about to explode? :-D
>>>>>
>>>>> On 23 November 2015 at 17:15, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
>>>>> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Same here. Built it and ran a couple of time, but still need the
>> legal
>>>>>> stuff.
>>>>>> Thanks Andy for you patience.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro
>>>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Looks good so far.
>>>>>>> Trying to review it in depth this evening.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 23.11.2015 um 15:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1, thanks Andy for the hard work!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> side note: we should say we have some deps the main project
>>>> doesn't
>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>> in tags when it is the case (javaee-api, jcs here), thought to
>> the
>>>>> vote
>>>>>>>> mail but then thought maybe in main README it would be better.
>>>> Just a
>>>>>>> side
>>>>>>>> note before forgetting :).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>>>>>>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2015-11-20 17:06 GMT+01:00 Alex Soto <as...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Do you need any kind of help on this in terms of downloading
>>>>> something
>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> clean environment and inspect something?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> El dv., 20 nov. 2015 a les 16:56, Romain Manni-Bucau (<
>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com>)
>>>>>>>>> va escriure:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hmm
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Maybe check we dont have git info in mvn artifacts otherwise
>>>>> binaries
>>>>>>>>> would
>>>>>>>>>> be wrong then. Anyone recalls?
>>>>>>>>>> Le 20 nov. 2015 07:55, "Andy Gumbrecht" <
>>>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>
>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Me too. so no idea where it's gone? - I'm going to delete it
>>>> and
>>>>>> take
>>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>>>>> from the tomee-7.0.0-M1 branch again
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>   Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>>>>>>>>   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>>>>>>>>>   http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>    Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>>    https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>>>    http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Jonathan Gallimore
>>>> http://twitter.com/jongallimore
>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>
>>>
>
>

-- 
   Andy Gumbrecht
   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jg...@tomitribe.com>.

I think it probably can.

That said, I have the following queries with the LICENCE/NOTICE files:

1. ASM notice from xbean-asm-shaded looks like its missing
2. Joda time notice looks like its missing
3. Notice for java-support jar (reference to OWasp) looks like its missing.

I'd be grateful if someone else could double check.

Thanks

Jon

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com> wrote:

> Can we close the vote now?
> It's been opened for more than 10 days now.
>
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>
> > Here is my +1 Andy
> >
> > Thank you very much for your patience and hard work
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
> > jgallimore@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Ditto. (I'll review tonight, not I have no patience) :-)
> >>
> >> Jon
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Andy Gumbrecht <
> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
> >> >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > I have none, can you not tell I am about to explode? :-D
> >> >
> >> > On 23 November 2015 at 17:15, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> >> > jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Same here. Built it and ran a couple of time, but still need the
> legal
> >> > > stuff.
> >> > > Thanks Andy for you patience.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> >> > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> >> > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> > >
> >> > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> >> > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Looks good so far.
> >> > > > Trying to review it in depth this evening.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > LieGrue,
> >> > > > strub
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Am 23.11.2015 um 15:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> >> > > rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >> > > > >:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > +1, thanks Andy for the hard work!
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > side note: we should say we have some deps the main project
> >> doesn't
> >> > > build
> >> > > > > in tags when it is the case (javaee-api, jcs here), thought to
> the
> >> > vote
> >> > > > > mail but then thought maybe in main README it would be better.
> >> Just a
> >> > > > side
> >> > > > > note before forgetting :).
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> >> > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> >> > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> >> > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> >> > > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > 2015-11-20 17:06 GMT+01:00 Alex Soto <as...@gmail.com>:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >> Do you need any kind of help on this in terms of downloading
> >> > something
> >> > > > in
> >> > > > >> clean environment and inspect something?
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >> El dv., 20 nov. 2015 a les 16:56, Romain Manni-Bucau (<
> >> > > > >> rmannibucau@gmail.com>)
> >> > > > >> va escriure:
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > > >>> Hmm
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>> Maybe check we dont have git info in mvn artifacts otherwise
> >> > binaries
> >> > > > >> would
> >> > > > >>> be wrong then. Anyone recalls?
> >> > > > >>> Le 20 nov. 2015 07:55, "Andy Gumbrecht" <
> >> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>
> >> > a
> >> > > > >>> écrit :
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>>> Me too. so no idea where it's gone? - I'm going to delete it
> >> and
> >> > > take
> >> > > > >> it
> >> > > > >>>> from the tomee-7.0.0-M1 branch again
> >> > > > >>>>
> >> > > > >>>> --
> >> > > > >>>>  Andy Gumbrecht
> >> > > > >>>>  https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> >> > > > >>>>  http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> > > > >>>>
> >> > > > >>>>
> >> > > > >>>
> >> > > > >>
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> >   Andy Gumbrecht
> >> >   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> >> >   http://www.tomitribe.com
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jonathan Gallimore
> >> http://twitter.com/jongallimore
> >> http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>
> >
> >
>



-- 
Jonathan Gallimore
http://twitter.com/jongallimore
http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>.

Can we close the vote now?
It's been opened for more than 10 days now.



--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com

On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com> wrote:

> Here is my +1 Andy
>
> Thank you very much for your patience and hard work
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
> jgallimore@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>
>> Ditto. (I'll review tonight, not I have no patience) :-)
>>
>> Jon
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Andy Gumbrecht <agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
>> >
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I have none, can you not tell I am about to explode? :-D
>> >
>> > On 23 November 2015 at 17:15, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
>> > jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Same here. Built it and ran a couple of time, but still need the legal
>> > > stuff.
>> > > Thanks Andy for you patience.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
>> > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>> > > http://www.tomitribe.com
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Looks good so far.
>> > > > Trying to review it in depth this evening.
>> > > >
>> > > > LieGrue,
>> > > > strub
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > Am 23.11.2015 um 15:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> > > rmannibucau@gmail.com
>> > > > >:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > +1, thanks Andy for the hard work!
>> > > > >
>> > > > > side note: we should say we have some deps the main project
>> doesn't
>> > > build
>> > > > > in tags when it is the case (javaee-api, jcs here), thought to the
>> > vote
>> > > > > mail but then thought maybe in main README it would be better.
>> Just a
>> > > > side
>> > > > > note before forgetting :).
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
>> > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>> > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>> > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
>> > > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
>> > > > >
>> > > > > 2015-11-20 17:06 GMT+01:00 Alex Soto <as...@gmail.com>:
>> > > > >
>> > > > >> Do you need any kind of help on this in terms of downloading
>> > something
>> > > > in
>> > > > >> clean environment and inspect something?
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >> El dv., 20 nov. 2015 a les 16:56, Romain Manni-Bucau (<
>> > > > >> rmannibucau@gmail.com>)
>> > > > >> va escriure:
>> > > > >>
>> > > > >>> Hmm
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>> Maybe check we dont have git info in mvn artifacts otherwise
>> > binaries
>> > > > >> would
>> > > > >>> be wrong then. Anyone recalls?
>> > > > >>> Le 20 nov. 2015 07:55, "Andy Gumbrecht" <
>> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>
>> > a
>> > > > >>> écrit :
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>>> Me too. so no idea where it's gone? - I'm going to delete it
>> and
>> > > take
>> > > > >> it
>> > > > >>>> from the tomee-7.0.0-M1 branch again
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>> --
>> > > > >>>>  Andy Gumbrecht
>> > > > >>>>  https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>> > > > >>>>  http://www.tomitribe.com
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>>
>> > > > >>>
>> > > > >>
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >   Andy Gumbrecht
>> >   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>> >   http://www.tomitribe.com
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jonathan Gallimore
>> http://twitter.com/jongallimore
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>.

Here is my +1 Andy

Thank you very much for your patience and hard work

--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
jgallimore@tomitribe.com> wrote:

> Ditto. (I'll review tonight, not I have no patience) :-)
>
> Jon
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I have none, can you not tell I am about to explode? :-D
> >
> > On 23 November 2015 at 17:15, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Same here. Built it and ran a couple of time, but still need the legal
> > > stuff.
> > > Thanks Andy for you patience.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >
> > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Looks good so far.
> > > > Trying to review it in depth this evening.
> > > >
> > > > LieGrue,
> > > > strub
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Am 23.11.2015 um 15:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > rmannibucau@gmail.com
> > > > >:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1, thanks Andy for the hard work!
> > > > >
> > > > > side note: we should say we have some deps the main project doesn't
> > > build
> > > > > in tags when it is the case (javaee-api, jcs here), thought to the
> > vote
> > > > > mail but then thought maybe in main README it would be better.
> Just a
> > > > side
> > > > > note before forgetting :).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > 2015-11-20 17:06 GMT+01:00 Alex Soto <as...@gmail.com>:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Do you need any kind of help on this in terms of downloading
> > something
> > > > in
> > > > >> clean environment and inspect something?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> El dv., 20 nov. 2015 a les 16:56, Romain Manni-Bucau (<
> > > > >> rmannibucau@gmail.com>)
> > > > >> va escriure:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>> Hmm
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Maybe check we dont have git info in mvn artifacts otherwise
> > binaries
> > > > >> would
> > > > >>> be wrong then. Anyone recalls?
> > > > >>> Le 20 nov. 2015 07:55, "Andy Gumbrecht" <
> agumbrecht@tomitribe.com>
> > a
> > > > >>> écrit :
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> Me too. so no idea where it's gone? - I'm going to delete it and
> > > take
> > > > >> it
> > > > >>>> from the tomee-7.0.0-M1 branch again
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> --
> > > > >>>>  Andy Gumbrecht
> > > > >>>>  https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> > > > >>>>  http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >   Andy Gumbrecht
> >   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> >   http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Jonathan Gallimore
> http://twitter.com/jongallimore
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jg...@tomitribe.com>.

Ditto. (I'll review tonight, not I have no patience) :-)

Jon

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>
wrote:

> I have none, can you not tell I am about to explode? :-D
>
> On 23 November 2015 at 17:15, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Same here. Built it and ran a couple of time, but still need the legal
> > stuff.
> > Thanks Andy for you patience.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Looks good so far.
> > > Trying to review it in depth this evening.
> > >
> > > LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> > >
> > > > Am 23.11.2015 um 15:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > rmannibucau@gmail.com
> > > >:
> > > >
> > > > +1, thanks Andy for the hard work!
> > > >
> > > > side note: we should say we have some deps the main project doesn't
> > build
> > > > in tags when it is the case (javaee-api, jcs here), thought to the
> vote
> > > > mail but then thought maybe in main README it would be better. Just a
> > > side
> > > > note before forgetting :).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > > > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> > > >
> > > > 2015-11-20 17:06 GMT+01:00 Alex Soto <as...@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > >> Do you need any kind of help on this in terms of downloading
> something
> > > in
> > > >> clean environment and inspect something?
> > > >>
> > > >> El dv., 20 nov. 2015 a les 16:56, Romain Manni-Bucau (<
> > > >> rmannibucau@gmail.com>)
> > > >> va escriure:
> > > >>
> > > >>> Hmm
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Maybe check we dont have git info in mvn artifacts otherwise
> binaries
> > > >> would
> > > >>> be wrong then. Anyone recalls?
> > > >>> Le 20 nov. 2015 07:55, "Andy Gumbrecht" <ag...@tomitribe.com>
> a
> > > >>> écrit :
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Me too. so no idea where it's gone? - I'm going to delete it and
> > take
> > > >> it
> > > >>>> from the tomee-7.0.0-M1 branch again
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> --
> > > >>>>  Andy Gumbrecht
> > > >>>>  https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> > > >>>>  http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
>   Andy Gumbrecht
>   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>   http://www.tomitribe.com
>



-- 
Jonathan Gallimore
http://twitter.com/jongallimore
http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>.

I have none, can you not tell I am about to explode? :-D

On 23 November 2015 at 17:15, Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>
wrote:

> Same here. Built it and ran a couple of time, but still need the legal
> stuff.
> Thanks Andy for you patience.
>
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
> On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
> > Looks good so far.
> > Trying to review it in depth this evening.
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> > > Am 23.11.2015 um 15:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibucau@gmail.com
> > >:
> > >
> > > +1, thanks Andy for the hard work!
> > >
> > > side note: we should say we have some deps the main project doesn't
> build
> > > in tags when it is the case (javaee-api, jcs here), thought to the vote
> > > mail but then thought maybe in main README it would be better. Just a
> > side
> > > note before forgetting :).
> > >
> > >
> > > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> > >
> > > 2015-11-20 17:06 GMT+01:00 Alex Soto <as...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > >> Do you need any kind of help on this in terms of downloading something
> > in
> > >> clean environment and inspect something?
> > >>
> > >> El dv., 20 nov. 2015 a les 16:56, Romain Manni-Bucau (<
> > >> rmannibucau@gmail.com>)
> > >> va escriure:
> > >>
> > >>> Hmm
> > >>>
> > >>> Maybe check we dont have git info in mvn artifacts otherwise binaries
> > >> would
> > >>> be wrong then. Anyone recalls?
> > >>> Le 20 nov. 2015 07:55, "Andy Gumbrecht" <ag...@tomitribe.com> a
> > >>> écrit :
> > >>>
> > >>>> Me too. so no idea where it's gone? - I'm going to delete it and
> take
> > >> it
> > >>>> from the tomee-7.0.0-M1 branch again
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>>  Andy Gumbrecht
> > >>>>  https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> > >>>>  http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>



-- 
  Andy Gumbrecht
  https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
  http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>.

Same here. Built it and ran a couple of time, but still need the legal
stuff.
Thanks Andy for you patience.



--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com

On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:39 PM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:

> Looks good so far.
> Trying to review it in depth this evening.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 23.11.2015 um 15:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >:
> >
> > +1, thanks Andy for the hard work!
> >
> > side note: we should say we have some deps the main project doesn't build
> > in tags when it is the case (javaee-api, jcs here), thought to the vote
> > mail but then thought maybe in main README it would be better. Just a
> side
> > note before forgetting :).
> >
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> > <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> >
> > 2015-11-20 17:06 GMT+01:00 Alex Soto <as...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> Do you need any kind of help on this in terms of downloading something
> in
> >> clean environment and inspect something?
> >>
> >> El dv., 20 nov. 2015 a les 16:56, Romain Manni-Bucau (<
> >> rmannibucau@gmail.com>)
> >> va escriure:
> >>
> >>> Hmm
> >>>
> >>> Maybe check we dont have git info in mvn artifacts otherwise binaries
> >> would
> >>> be wrong then. Anyone recalls?
> >>> Le 20 nov. 2015 07:55, "Andy Gumbrecht" <ag...@tomitribe.com> a
> >>> écrit :
> >>>
> >>>> Me too. so no idea where it's gone? - I'm going to delete it and take
> >> it
> >>>> from the tomee-7.0.0-M1 branch again
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>>  Andy Gumbrecht
> >>>>  https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> >>>>  http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.

Looks good so far.
Trying to review it in depth this evening.

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 23.11.2015 um 15:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>:
> 
> +1, thanks Andy for the hard work!
> 
> side note: we should say we have some deps the main project doesn't build
> in tags when it is the case (javaee-api, jcs here), thought to the vote
> mail but then thought maybe in main README it would be better. Just a side
> note before forgetting :).
> 
> 
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> <http://www.tomitribe.com>
> 
> 2015-11-20 17:06 GMT+01:00 Alex Soto <as...@gmail.com>:
> 
>> Do you need any kind of help on this in terms of downloading something in
>> clean environment and inspect something?
>> 
>> El dv., 20 nov. 2015 a les 16:56, Romain Manni-Bucau (<
>> rmannibucau@gmail.com>)
>> va escriure:
>> 
>>> Hmm
>>> 
>>> Maybe check we dont have git info in mvn artifacts otherwise binaries
>> would
>>> be wrong then. Anyone recalls?
>>> Le 20 nov. 2015 07:55, "Andy Gumbrecht" <ag...@tomitribe.com> a
>>> écrit :
>>> 
>>>> Me too. so no idea where it's gone? - I'm going to delete it and take
>> it
>>>> from the tomee-7.0.0-M1 branch again
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>>  Andy Gumbrecht
>>>>  https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>>>  http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.

+1, thanks Andy for the hard work!

side note: we should say we have some deps the main project doesn't build
in tags when it is the case (javaee-api, jcs here), thought to the vote
mail but then thought maybe in main README it would be better. Just a side
note before forgetting :).


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>

2015-11-20 17:06 GMT+01:00 Alex Soto <as...@gmail.com>:

> Do you need any kind of help on this in terms of downloading something in
> clean environment and inspect something?
>
> El dv., 20 nov. 2015 a les 16:56, Romain Manni-Bucau (<
> rmannibucau@gmail.com>)
> va escriure:
>
> > Hmm
> >
> > Maybe check we dont have git info in mvn artifacts otherwise binaries
> would
> > be wrong then. Anyone recalls?
> > Le 20 nov. 2015 07:55, "Andy Gumbrecht" <ag...@tomitribe.com> a
> > écrit :
> >
> > > Me too. so no idea where it's gone? - I'm going to delete it and take
> it
> > > from the tomee-7.0.0-M1 branch again
> > >
> > > --
> > >   Andy Gumbrecht
> > >   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> > >   http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Alex Soto <as...@gmail.com>.

Do you need any kind of help on this in terms of downloading something in
clean environment and inspect something?

El dv., 20 nov. 2015 a les 16:56, Romain Manni-Bucau (<rm...@gmail.com>)
va escriure:

> Hmm
>
> Maybe check we dont have git info in mvn artifacts otherwise binaries would
> be wrong then. Anyone recalls?
> Le 20 nov. 2015 07:55, "Andy Gumbrecht" <ag...@tomitribe.com> a
> écrit :
>
> > Me too. so no idea where it's gone? - I'm going to delete it and take it
> > from the tomee-7.0.0-M1 branch again
> >
> > --
> >   Andy Gumbrecht
> >   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> >   http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
> >
>

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.

Hmm

Maybe check we dont have git info in mvn artifacts otherwise binaries would
be wrong then. Anyone recalls?
Le 20 nov. 2015 07:55, "Andy Gumbrecht" <ag...@tomitribe.com> a écrit :

> Me too. so no idea where it's gone? - I'm going to delete it and take it
> from the tomee-7.0.0-M1 branch again
>
> --
>   Andy Gumbrecht
>   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>   http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>.

I'll check now, if they are missing then it'll have to be a re-roll.

Andy.

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>.

Me too. so no idea where it's gone? - I'm going to delete it and take it 
from the tomee-7.0.0-M1 branch again

-- 
   Andy Gumbrecht
   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
   http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.

I use push --follow-tags
Le 20 nov. 2015 07:45, "cchacin" <cc...@gmail.com> a écrit :

> git push --tags
>
> ???
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015, 7:39 AM agumbrecht [via TomEE & OpenEJB] <
> ml-node+s979440n4676916h54@n4.nabble.com> wrote:
>
> > OK, no idea on why it's not there - need some git magic commands, any
> > offers?
> >
> > On 20/11/2015 16:28, Andy Gumbrecht wrote:
> >
> > > Weird, should have pushed ....seriously starting to absolutely hate
> git!
> > >
> > > On 20/11/2015 16:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Locally, not on asf
> > >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=summary
> > >>
> > >> Hard to checkout it on your box ;)
> > >>
> > >> Le 20 nov. 2015 00:47, "Andy Gumbrecht" <[hidden email]
> > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4676916&i=0>
> > >> <mailto:[hidden email]
> > <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4676916&i=1>>> a écrit :
> > >>
> > >>     git tag -l
> > >>
> > >>     > release-tomee-7.0.0-M1
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>     On 19/11/2015 19:36, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> > >>
> > >>         Hi Andy,
> > >>
> > >>         can you push the release branch either on asf or github?
> > >>
> > >>         Romain Manni-Bucau
> > >>         @rmannibucau |  Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>         --            Andy Gumbrecht
> > >>         https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> > >>         http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >>
> > >
> >
> > --
> >    Andy Gumbrecht
> >    https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> >    http://www.tomitribe.com
> >
> >     --
> >     Andy Gumbrecht
> >
> >     http://www.tomitribe.com
> >     agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
> >     https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> >
> >     TomEE treibt Tomitribe ! | http://tomee.apache.org
> >
> >
> > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> > below:
> >
> >
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-staging-1069-tomee-7-0-0-M1-tp4676826p4676916.html
> > To start a new topic under TomEE Dev, email
> > ml-node+s979440n982480h38@n4.nabble.com
> > To unsubscribe from TomEE Dev, click here
> > <
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=982480&code=Y2NoYWNpbkBnbWFpbC5jb218OTgyNDgwfDE2NzcwMDYzOTY=
> >
> > .
> > NAML
> > <
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> -----
> Carlos Chacin
> http://github.com/cchacin
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-staging-1069-tomee-7-0-0-M1-tp4676826p4676918.html
> Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by cchacin <cc...@gmail.com>.

git push --tags

???

On Fri, Nov 20, 2015, 7:39 AM agumbrecht [via TomEE & OpenEJB] <
ml-node+s979440n4676916h54@n4.nabble.com> wrote:

> OK, no idea on why it's not there - need some git magic commands, any
> offers?
>
> On 20/11/2015 16:28, Andy Gumbrecht wrote:
>
> > Weird, should have pushed ....seriously starting to absolutely hate git!
> >
> > On 20/11/2015 16:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> >>
> >> Locally, not on asf
> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=summary
> >>
> >> Hard to checkout it on your box ;)
> >>
> >> Le 20 nov. 2015 00:47, "Andy Gumbrecht" <[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4676916&i=0>
> >> <mailto:[hidden email]
> <http:///user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=4676916&i=1>>> a écrit :
> >>
> >>     git tag -l
> >>
> >>     > release-tomee-7.0.0-M1
> >>
> >>
> >>     On 19/11/2015 19:36, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> >>
> >>         Hi Andy,
> >>
> >>         can you push the release branch either on asf or github?
> >>
> >>         Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>         @rmannibucau |  Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>         --            Andy Gumbrecht
> >>         https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
> >>         http://www.tomitribe.com
> >>
> >
>
> --
>    Andy Gumbrecht
>    https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>    http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>     --
>     Andy Gumbrecht
>
>     http://www.tomitribe.com
>     agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
>     https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>
>     TomEE treibt Tomitribe ! | http://tomee.apache.org
>
>
> If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-staging-1069-tomee-7-0-0-M1-tp4676826p4676916.html
> To start a new topic under TomEE Dev, email
> ml-node+s979440n982480h38@n4.nabble.com
> To unsubscribe from TomEE Dev, click here
> <http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=982480&code=Y2NoYWNpbkBnbWFpbC5jb218OTgyNDgwfDE2NzcwMDYzOTY=>
> .
> NAML
> <http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml>
>




-----
Carlos Chacin
http://github.com/cchacin
--
View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-staging-1069-tomee-7-0-0-M1-tp4676826p4676918.html
Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>.

OK, no idea on why it's not there - need some git magic commands, any 
offers?

On 20/11/2015 16:28, Andy Gumbrecht wrote:
> Weird, should have pushed ....seriously starting to absolutely hate git!
>
> On 20/11/2015 16:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>
>> Locally, not on asf 
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=summary
>>
>> Hard to checkout it on your box ;)
>>
>> Le 20 nov. 2015 00:47, "Andy Gumbrecht" <agumbrecht@tomitribe.com 
>> <ma...@tomitribe.com>> a écrit :
>>
>>     git tag -l
>>
>>     > release-tomee-7.0.0-M1
>>
>>
>>     On 19/11/2015 19:36, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>
>>         Hi Andy,
>>
>>         can you push the release branch either on asf or github?
>>
>>         Romain Manni-Bucau
>>         @rmannibucau |  Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber
>>
>>
>>
>>         --            Andy Gumbrecht
>>         https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>         http://www.tomitribe.com
>>
>

-- 
   Andy Gumbrecht
   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
   http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.

:)
Le 20 nov. 2015 07:28, "Andy Gumbrecht" <ag...@tomitribe.com> a écrit :

> Weird, should have pushed ....seriously starting to absolutely hate git!
>
> On 20/11/2015 16:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
>>
>> Locally, not on asf
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=summary
>>
>> Hard to checkout it on your box ;)
>>
>> Le 20 nov. 2015 00:47, "Andy Gumbrecht" <agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
>> <ma...@tomitribe.com>> a écrit :
>>
>>     git tag -l
>>
>>     > release-tomee-7.0.0-M1
>>
>>
>>     On 19/11/2015 19:36, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>
>>         Hi Andy,
>>
>>         can you push the release branch either on asf or github?
>>
>>         Romain Manni-Bucau
>>         @rmannibucau |  Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber
>>
>>
>>
>>         --            Andy Gumbrecht
>>         https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>         http://www.tomitribe.com
>>
>>
> --
>   Andy Gumbrecht
>   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>   http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>.

Weird, should have pushed ....seriously starting to absolutely hate git!

On 20/11/2015 16:12, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
> Locally, not on asf 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=summary
>
> Hard to checkout it on your box ;)
>
> Le 20 nov. 2015 00:47, "Andy Gumbrecht" <agumbrecht@tomitribe.com 
> <ma...@tomitribe.com>> a écrit :
>
>     git tag -l
>
>     > release-tomee-7.0.0-M1
>
>
>     On 19/11/2015 19:36, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
>         Hi Andy,
>
>         can you push the release branch either on asf or github?
>
>         Romain Manni-Bucau
>         @rmannibucau |  Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber
>
>
>
>         -- 
>            Andy Gumbrecht
>         https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>         http://www.tomitribe.com
>

-- 
   Andy Gumbrecht
   https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
   http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.

Locally, not on asf
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=summary

Hard to checkout it on your box ;)
Le 20 nov. 2015 00:47, "Andy Gumbrecht" <ag...@tomitribe.com> a écrit :

> git tag -l
>
> > release-tomee-7.0.0-M1
>
>
> On 19/11/2015 19:36, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
>> Hi Andy,
>>
>> can you push the release branch either on asf or github?
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau |  Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>    Andy Gumbrecht
>>    https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>    http://www.tomitribe.com
>>
>

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Andy Gumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>.

git tag -l

 > release-tomee-7.0.0-M1


On 19/11/2015 19:36, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> can you push the release branch either on asf or github?
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau |  Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber
>
>
>
> -- 
>    Andy Gumbrecht
>    https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>    http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.

Hi Andy,

can you push the release branch either on asf or github?

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau |  Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber


2015-11-19 10:26 GMT-08:00 Daniel Cunha <da...@gmail.com>:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 2:39 PM, agumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Here is my +1
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>>     --
>>     Andy Gumbrecht
>>
>>     http://www.tomitribe.com
>>     agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
>>     https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>>
>>     TomEE treibt Tomitribe ! | http://tomee.apache.org
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-staging-1069-tomee-7-0-0-M1-tp4676826p4676885.html
>> Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Cunha
> https://twitter.com/dvlc_
> http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by Daniel Cunha <da...@gmail.com>.

+1

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 2:39 PM, agumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>
wrote:

> Here is my +1
>
>
>
> -----
>     --
>     Andy Gumbrecht
>
>     http://www.tomitribe.com
>     agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
>     https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe
>
>     TomEE treibt Tomitribe ! | http://tomee.apache.org
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-staging-1069-tomee-7-0-0-M1-tp4676826p4676885.html
> Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>



-- 
Daniel Cunha
https://twitter.com/dvlc_
http://www.tomitribe.com

Re: [VOTE] staging-1069 - tomee-7.0.0-M1

Posted by agumbrecht <ag...@tomitribe.com>.

Here is my +1



-----
    -- 
    Andy Gumbrecht

    http://www.tomitribe.com
    agumbrecht@tomitribe.com
    https://twitter.com/AndyGeeDe

    TomEE treibt Tomitribe ! | http://tomee.apache.org
--
View this message in context: http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/VOTE-staging-1069-tomee-7-0-0-M1-tp4676826p4676885.html
Sent from the TomEE Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.