You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
- Re: RFC-compliant DFDL schema for parsing and unparsing CSV files - posted by "Sloane, Brandon" <bs...@tresys.com> on 2019/12/01 16:36:26 UTC, 4 replies.
- Daffodil parsing fails on optional elements when maxOccurs set to "unbounded", passes when set to "999" - posted by Peter Kostouros <Pe...@awta.com.au> on 2019/12/04 05:35:29 UTC, 7 replies.
- DFDL Specification with all Errata edited in - posted by "Beckerle, Mike" <mb...@tresys.com> on 2019/12/13 03:34:18 UTC, 0 replies.
- DFDL does neither parsing nor unparsing ... do you agree? - posted by "Costello, Roger L." <co...@mitre.org> on 2019/12/23 14:45:15 UTC, 4 replies.
- Is this how DFDL started? - posted by "Costello, Roger L." <co...@mitre.org> on 2019/12/23 16:40:06 UTC, 1 replies.
- Unparsing unordered sequences behaviour - posted by Peter Kostouros <Pe...@awta.com.au> on 2019/12/30 02:23:32 UTC, 5 replies.
- Bug in Daffodil - posted by "Costello, Roger L." <co...@mitre.org> on 2019/12/30 17:29:19 UTC, 1 replies.
- Bug: Daffodil does not have the implied behavior of dfdl:separatorSuppression="never" when dfdl:occursCountKind="expression" - posted by "Costello, Roger L." <co...@mitre.org> on 2019/12/30 17:41:34 UTC, 1 replies.
- RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re: Unparsing unordered sequences behaviour - posted by "Horvath, Attila J CTR (USA)" <at...@mail.mil> on 2019/12/30 18:04:58 UTC, 1 replies.