You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
- Re: What constitutes a source release? - posted by Henri Yandell <he...@yandell.org> on 2013/05/01 03:13:15 UTC, 14 replies.
- svn commit: r1478003 - /infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/resolved.mdtext - posted by ru...@apache.org on 2013/05/01 16:01:51 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Commented] (LEGAL-163) Are "Ubuntu License 1.0" licensed fonts allowed in the repo - posted by "Sam Ruby (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/05/01 16:06:16 UTC, 1 replies.
- Source form Re: What constitutes a source release? - posted by Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name> on 2013/05/02 21:54:31 UTC, 10 replies.
- RE: Source form Re: What constitutes a source release? - The Source for Fonts - posted by "Dennis E. Hamilton" <de...@acm.org> on 2013/05/04 18:18:28 UTC, 1 replies.
- [jira] [Closed] (LEGAL-163) Are "Ubuntu License 1.0" licensed fonts allowed in the repo - posted by "Andreas Lehmkühler (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/05/05 19:56:16 UTC, 0 replies.
- updating w.a.o/legal/resolved for Creative Commons Attribution - posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> on 2013/05/14 00:44:46 UTC, 22 replies.
- svn commit: r1483529 - /infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/resolved.mdtext - posted by ke...@apache.org on 2013/05/16 21:24:14 UTC, 0 replies.
- Is "SIL Open Font License" compatible with AL? - posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> on 2013/05/27 16:10:35 UTC, 6 replies.
- Guidelines for attributed contributions - posted by "Roger L. Whitcomb" <Ro...@actian.com> on 2013/05/28 21:32:35 UTC, 2 replies.
- Issue on legal private - posted by Alan Gates <ga...@hortonworks.com> on 2013/05/29 01:24:36 UTC, 1 replies.
- svn commit: r1487679 - /infrastructure/site/trunk/content/legal/src-headers.mdtext - posted by se...@apache.org on 2013/05/30 01:25:45 UTC, 0 replies.
- GPL Incompatibility in Apache Tika 1.2 - posted by "Polhodzik Peter (ext)" <Pe...@evosoft.com> on 2013/05/31 13:44:08 UTC, 12 replies.