You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
- svn commit: r1005711 - /infrastructure/site/trunk/xdocs/licenses/exports/index.xml - posted by lh...@apache.org on 2010/10/08 06:54:31 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] Created: (LEGAL-81) License Status of a dependency for a newly incubating project - posted by "Dan Haywood (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/10/08 15:51:31 UTC, 0 replies.
- svn commit: r1006246 - in /infrastructure/site/trunk/docs: legal/ licenses/ licenses/exports/ licenses/proposed/ - posted by ni...@apache.org on 2010/10/10 05:08:42 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] Updated: (LEGAL-81) Is it ok/meaningful to have a dependency licensed as ASL just for Apache Software Foundation, but LGPL for anyone else? - posted by "Dan Haywood (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/10/11 16:29:33 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] Created: (LEGAL-82) Is it ok to USE (rather than DISTRIBUTE) a Category-X dependency? If so, what, precisely, is allowed? - posted by "Dan Haywood (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/10/11 16:55:32 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] Commented: (LEGAL-82) Is it ok to USE (rather than DISTRIBUTE) a Category-X dependency? If so, what, precisely, is allowed? - posted by "Mark Struberg (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/10/11 17:03:35 UTC, 3 replies.
- [jira] Commented: (LEGAL-81) Is it ok/meaningful to have a dependency licensed as ASL just for Apache Software Foundation, but LGPL for anyone else? - posted by "Sam Ruby (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/10/11 22:39:33 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] Closed: (LEGAL-82) Is it ok to USE (rather than DISTRIBUTE) a Category-X dependency? If so, what, precisely, is allowed? - posted by "Dan Haywood (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/10/11 23:07:35 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] Created: (LEGAL-83) Is the JavaFX license compatible with Apache Software Foundation? - posted by "Dan Haywood (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/10/12 13:32:32 UTC, 0 replies.
- Re: Question on Sanselan IccTagType - posted by Paul Lindner <li...@inuus.com> on 2010/10/13 17:51:16 UTC, 4 replies.
- [jira] Commented: (LEGAL-80) NTLM Inclusion in Apache Projects - posted by "Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/10/18 14:46:23 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] Closed: (LEGAL-80) NTLM Inclusion in Apache Projects - posted by "Sam Ruby (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/10/18 15:14:24 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] Commented: (LEGAL-83) Is the JavaFX license compatible with Apache Software Foundation? - posted by "Sam Ruby (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/10/18 17:21:25 UTC, 1 replies.
- Legal questions about moving JXTA/JXSE project to ASF - posted by Jérôme Verstrynge <jv...@gmail.com> on 2010/10/21 21:34:20 UTC, 6 replies.
- [jira] Created: (LEGAL-84) What are the requirements for the [PRODUCT_NAME] in the NOTICE file? - posted by "ant elder (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/10/22 14:46:15 UTC, 0 replies.
- svn commit: r1026315 - in /infrastructure/site/trunk/docs: legal/ licenses/ licenses/exports/ licenses/proposed/ - posted by be...@apache.org on 2010/10/22 15:13:08 UTC, 0 replies.
- Meetings @ ACUS regarding budget and other stuff - posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/10/28 16:01:32 UTC, 0 replies.