You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
- [GitHub] [uima-uimaj] reckart opened a new issue, #267: UIMA Log4jLogger_impl not compatible with log4j 2.18.0+ - posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/12/02 19:28:30 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Created] (UIMA-6483) UIMA SimpleServer is not compatible with the latest Ruta feature (relation annotation) - posted by "Yue Yang (Jira)" <de...@uima.apache.org> on 2022/12/03 17:11:00 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Updated] (UIMA-6483) UIMA SimpleServer is not compatible with the latest Ruta feature (relation annotation) - posted by "Yue Yang (Jira)" <de...@uima.apache.org> on 2022/12/03 17:13:00 UTC, 2 replies.
- [GitHub] [uima-uimaj] reckart opened a new issue, #268: UIMA components log and then re-throw exceptions which usually leads to errors being logged twice - posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/12/07 07:30:23 UTC, 0 replies.
- [VOTE] Retire UIMA DUCC - posted by Richard Eckart de Castilho <re...@apache.org> on 2022/12/07 07:45:18 UTC, 3 replies.
- [VOTE] Retire UIMA C++ SDK - posted by Richard Eckart de Castilho <re...@apache.org> on 2022/12/07 07:46:35 UTC, 21 replies.
- [VOTE] Retire v2 of UIMA Java SDK, uimaFIT, Ruta and UIMA AS - posted by Richard Eckart de Castilho <re...@apache.org> on 2022/12/07 07:53:22 UTC, 2 replies.
- [GitHub] [uima-uimaj] reckart opened a new pull request, #269: #267 - UIMA Log4jLogger_impl not compatible with log4j 2.18.0+ - posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/12/07 08:53:08 UTC, 0 replies.
- [GitHub] [uima-uimaj] reckart merged pull request #269: #267 - UIMA Log4jLogger_impl not compatible with log4j 2.18.0+ - posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/12/07 12:27:59 UTC, 0 replies.
- [GitHub] [uima-uimaj] reckart commented on issue #267: UIMA Log4jLogger_impl not compatible with log4j 2.18.0+ - posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/12/07 12:28:53 UTC, 0 replies.
- [GitHub] [uima-uimaj] reckart opened a new issue, #270: Update dependencies (3.4.0) - posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/12/07 12:30:19 UTC, 0 replies.
- [GitHub] [uima-uimaj] reckart opened a new pull request, #271: #270 - Update dependencies - posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/12/07 12:35:11 UTC, 0 replies.
- [GitHub] [uima-uimaj] reckart merged pull request #271: #270 - Update dependencies - posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/12/12 15:52:39 UTC, 0 replies.
- [GitHub] [uima-uimaj] reckart opened a new issue, #272: select on FSArray seems broken - posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/12/14 17:41:58 UTC, 0 replies.
- [RFC] UIMA board report for Q4 2022 due (actually overdue) - posted by Richard Eckart de Castilho <re...@apache.org> on 2022/12/19 13:48:02 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Commented] (UIMA-6483) UIMA SimpleServer is not compatible with the latest Ruta feature (relation annotation) - posted by "Richard Eckart de Castilho (Jira)" <de...@uima.apache.org> on 2022/12/19 13:52:00 UTC, 0 replies.
- [RESULT][VOTE] Retire v2 of UIMA Java SDK, uimaFIT, Ruta and UIMA AS - posted by Richard Eckart de Castilho <re...@apache.org> on 2022/12/21 09:28:30 UTC, 0 replies.
- [RESULT][VOTE] Retire UIMA DUCC - posted by Richard Eckart de Castilho <re...@apache.org> on 2022/12/21 09:30:08 UTC, 1 replies.
- [jira] [Created] (UIMA-6484) Retire UIMA DUCC - posted by "Richard Eckart de Castilho (Jira)" <de...@uima.apache.org> on 2022/12/21 10:10:00 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Assigned] (UIMA-6484) Retire UIMA DUCC - posted by "Richard Eckart de Castilho (Jira)" <de...@uima.apache.org> on 2022/12/21 10:10:00 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Work started] (UIMA-6484) Retire UIMA DUCC - posted by "Richard Eckart de Castilho (Jira)" <de...@uima.apache.org> on 2022/12/21 10:11:00 UTC, 0 replies.
- [GitHub] [uima-uimafit] reckart closed issue #215: Improve descriptor scanning performance when there are many classloaders - posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/12/22 11:39:34 UTC, 0 replies.
- UIMA board report for Q4 2022 submitted - posted by Richard Eckart de Castilho <re...@apache.org> on 2022/12/28 18:23:14 UTC, 0 replies.