You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
- Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Adding initial SVE implementation (#18) - posted by alter-xp <no...@github.com.INVALID> on 2022/07/01 03:07:35 UTC, 5 replies.
- Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Name mangling in IRModules (PR #84) - posted by Krzysztof Parzyszek <no...@github.com.INVALID> on 2022/07/01 13:59:45 UTC, 11 replies.
- [apache/tvm] [release] Add script to gather PRs for a release (PR #11987) - posted by driazati <no...@github.com.INVALID> on 2022/07/01 17:26:13 UTC, 2 replies.
- [apache/tvm] [release][v0.9] Remove VTA submodule (PR #11989) - posted by driazati <no...@github.com.INVALID> on 2022/07/01 17:39:13 UTC, 3 replies.
- [apache/tvm] [release] Bump version numbers to v0.9.0 (PR #11990) - posted by driazati <no...@github.com.INVALID> on 2022/07/01 18:21:09 UTC, 1 replies.
- [apache/tvm] [release] Bump version numbers to v0.9.0 (PR #11991) - posted by driazati <no...@github.com.INVALID> on 2022/07/01 18:33:15 UTC, 2 replies.
- [apache/tvm] [release][v0.9] Remove VTA submodule (PR #11992) - posted by driazati <no...@github.com.INVALID> on 2022/07/01 20:33:32 UTC, 3 replies.
- Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Encapsulate LLVM target for use with LLVM libraries (PR #83) - posted by Krzysztof Parzyszek <no...@github.com.INVALID> on 2022/07/05 20:01:25 UTC, 1 replies.
- Re: [apache/tvm] [release] v0.9.0 Release Schedule (Issue #11736) - posted by Andrew Reusch <no...@github.com.INVALID> on 2022/07/06 17:53:14 UTC, 3 replies.
- Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] TVMScript Metaprogramming (PR #79) - posted by Lite Ye <no...@github.com.INVALID> on 2022/07/07 20:09:24 UTC, 8 replies.
- Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Create LLVM scope class for use with LLVM libraries (PR #83) - posted by Tianqi Chen <no...@github.com.INVALID> on 2022/07/08 13:21:35 UTC, 13 replies.
- Re: [apache/tvm] [ci][docker] Use RFC image tags only (PR #11938) - posted by "github-actions[bot]" <no...@github.com.INVALID> on 2022/07/08 15:36:27 UTC, 7 replies.
- Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [RFC] Buffer Layout Padding (PR #77) - posted by Tianqi Chen <no...@github.com.INVALID> on 2022/07/11 16:16:19 UTC, 5 replies.
- Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] [USMP] Update RFC with constants pools (PR #81) - posted by Andrew Reusch <no...@github.com.INVALID> on 2022/07/12 18:20:54 UTC, 0 replies.
- [apache/tvm] [COMMUNITY] Add driazati key for release (PR #12076) - posted by driazati <no...@github.com.INVALID> on 2022/07/12 20:04:12 UTC, 2 replies.
- Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] Add Target Pre-processing RFC (PR #71) - posted by Andrew Reusch <no...@github.com.INVALID> on 2022/07/14 18:28:21 UTC, 6 replies.
- [apache/tvm] TVM v0.9.0.rc0 Release Candidate (Issue #12102) - posted by driazati <no...@github.com.INVALID> on 2022/07/14 22:32:32 UTC, 0 replies.
- [apache/tvm] [VOTE] Release Apache TVM v0.9.0.rc0 (Issue #12103) - posted by driazati <no...@github.com.INVALID> on 2022/07/14 22:35:10 UTC, 11 replies.
- [apache/tvm] Pre-release v0.9.0.rc0 - Apache TVM v0.9.0.rc0 - posted by driazati <no...@github.com.INVALID> on 2022/07/14 22:36:31 UTC, 0 replies.
- Re: [apache/tvm-rfcs] Add Target Features RFC (PR #78) - posted by Krzysztof Parzyszek <no...@github.com.INVALID> on 2022/07/15 15:26:43 UTC, 1 replies.
- [apache/tvm] [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache TVM v0.9.0.rc0 (Issue #12133) - posted by driazati <no...@github.com.INVALID> on 2022/07/19 16:21:06 UTC, 0 replies.
- Re: [apache/tvm] TVM v0.9.0.rc0 Release Candidate Notes (Issue #12102) - posted by driazati <no...@github.com.INVALID> on 2022/07/19 16:21:33 UTC, 0 replies.
- Re: [apache/tvm] [RFC][Tracking Issue] Pipeline Executor For Compute graph pipeline (#8596) - posted by Hua Jiang <no...@github.com.INVALID> on 2022/07/23 03:22:47 UTC, 2 replies.
- [apache/tvm] [RFC][Tracking Issue] Name mangling in IRModules (Issue #12181) - posted by Florin Blanaru <no...@github.com.INVALID> on 2022/07/25 19:37:50 UTC, 0 replies.
- Re: [apache/tvm] [RFC][Tracking Issue] Meta Schedule (AutoTIR) (#8473) - posted by Tianqi Chen <no...@github.com.INVALID> on 2022/07/26 19:24:42 UTC, 0 replies.