You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
- [jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-3968) Add getJMSResourceFactory() method to JMSBindingReferenceBindingProvider - posted by "Jennifer A Thompson (Created) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/01 16:21:32 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-3969) RRBJMSBindingInvoker.invoke() should be setting timeout - posted by "Jennifer A Thompson (Created) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/01 16:55:32 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-3970) Improve error handling in TransportServiceInterceptor.invoke() - posted by "Jennifer A Thompson (Created) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/01 21:01:32 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-3971) JMSBindingProcessor.writeOperationProperties should trim() properties prior to writing them & update logic to write JMS attributes even if properties are null. - posted by "Jennifer A Thompson (Created) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/01 21:27:32 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-3972) JMSBIndingProcessor.writeDestinationProperties should handle Destination Type - posted by "Jennifer A Thompson (Created) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/01 21:31:33 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-3973) OperationSelectorJMSDefaultServiceInterceptor.getTargetOperation() should also handle wireformat type WireFormatJMSBytesXML - posted by "Jennifer A Thompson (Created) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/01 21:39:33 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-3974) IntentNotSatisfiedAtBuild error occurs when using an intent provided by implementation - posted by "Greg Dritschler (Created) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/01 23:31:32 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Updated] (TUSCANY-3974) IntentNotSatisfiedAtBuild error occurs when using an intent provided by implementation - posted by "Greg Dritschler (Updated) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/01 23:31:32 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-3968) Add getJMSResourceFactory() method to JMSBindingReferenceBindingProvider - posted by "ant elder (Closed) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/03 15:01:33 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-3970) Improve error handling in TransportServiceInterceptor.invoke() - posted by "ant elder (Closed) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/03 15:29:32 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-3971) JMSBindingProcessor.writeOperationProperties should trim() properties prior to writing them & update logic to write JMS attributes even if properties are null. - posted by "ant elder (Closed) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/03 15:35:32 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-3973) OperationSelectorJMSDefaultServiceInterceptor.getTargetOperation() should also handle wireformat type WireFormatJMSBytesXML - posted by "ant elder (Closed) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/03 15:41:32 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-3972) JMSBIndingProcessor.writeDestinationProperties should handle Destination Type - posted by "ant elder (Closed) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/03 15:47:32 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-3967) Binding jms modules should be more easily extendable - posted by "ant elder (Closed) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/04 11:25:00 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Commented] (TUSCANY-3969) RRBJMSBindingInvoker.invoke() should be setting timeout - posted by "Greg Dritschler (Commented) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/04 17:03:54 UTC, 1 replies.
- ASF Board report this month - posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com> on 2011/11/08 13:09:09 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-3975) Missing Extension processing in WebServiceBindingProcessor class - posted by "Rashmi Hunt (Created) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/09 21:59:52 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Updated] (TUSCANY-3975) Missing Extension processing in WebServiceBindingProcessor class - posted by "Rashmi Hunt (Updated) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/09 22:01:52 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Assigned] (TUSCANY-3975) Missing Extension processing in WebServiceBindingProcessor class - posted by "ant elder (Assigned) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/10 10:24:51 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-3975) Missing Extension processing in WebServiceBindingProcessor class - posted by "ant elder (Closed) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/10 10:30:51 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Reopened] (TUSCANY-3975) Missing Extension processing in WebServiceBindingProcessor class - posted by "ant elder (Reopened) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/10 12:40:52 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Commented] (TUSCANY-3975) Missing Extension processing in WebServiceBindingProcessor class - posted by "ant elder (Commented) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/10 13:04:51 UTC, 0 replies.
- WebServiceBindingProcessor validation rules & SOAP over JMS - posted by Rashmi Hunt <ra...@gmail.com> on 2011/11/11 01:03:18 UTC, 3 replies.
- Updates to binding.http - posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> on 2011/11/11 05:21:26 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-3976) Allow extensions to save information about client async request - posted by "Greg Dritschler (Created) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/20 18:59:51 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Updated] (TUSCANY-3976) Allow extensions to save information about client async request - posted by "Greg Dritschler (Updated) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/20 19:01:51 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-3977) No way to configure wink timeout for binding.rest - posted by "Anuj Bhatia (Created) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/21 10:40:52 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Updated] (TUSCANY-3977) No way to configure wink timeout for binding.rest - posted by "Anuj Bhatia (Updated) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/21 10:56:51 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Assigned] (TUSCANY-3976) Allow extensions to save information about client async request - posted by "ant elder (Assigned) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/21 11:08:51 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-3976) Allow extensions to save information about client async request - posted by "ant elder (Closed) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/21 12:30:52 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-3977) No way to configure wink timeout for binding.rest - posted by "ant elder (Closed) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/21 13:40:52 UTC, 0 replies.
- Fwd: tomcat integration help (tuscany 2.0beta3) - posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com> on 2011/11/21 16:30:58 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-3978) The common-xml module DOMHelperTestCase testPool tests fail when running with JDK7 - posted by "ant elder (Created) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/23 12:49:44 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-3979) Several of the binding-ws-runtime modules unit tests fail when building with JDK7 - posted by "ant elder (Created) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/23 12:49:45 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-3980) The policy-wspolicy module build fails when building with JDK7 - posted by "ant elder (Created) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/23 12:51:39 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-3982) Policy compliance test failures when running with JDK7 - posted by "ant elder (Created) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/23 13:05:39 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-3981) Assembly compliance test failures when running with JDK7 - posted by "ant elder (Created) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/23 13:05:39 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-3983) Many itest failures when running with JDK7 - posted by "ant elder (Created) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/23 13:25:39 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Commented] (TUSCANY-3978) The common-xml module DOMHelperTestCase testPool tests fail when running with JDK7 - posted by "ant elder (Commented) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/23 17:03:39 UTC, 1 replies.
- [jira] [Closed] (TUSCANY-3857) unwrapping OMElementWrapperHandler can't easily tolerate both non-valid data and minOccurs="0" data - posted by "Scott Kurz (Closed) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/23 22:16:40 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-3984) Service refernces do not serialize according to SCA spec - posted by "Sebastian Millies (Created) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/23 23:58:40 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Updated] (TUSCANY-3984) Service references do not serialize according to SCA spec - posted by "Sebastian Millies (Updated) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/24 00:00:44 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Updated] (TUSCANY-3984) Service refernces do not serialize according to SCA spec - posted by "Sebastian Millies (Updated) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/24 00:00:44 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Assigned] (TUSCANY-3984) Service references do not serialize according to SCA spec - posted by "Simon Nash (Assigned) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/24 22:16:40 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-3985) Manipulate custom SOAP headers - posted by "Ricky Wong (Created) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/28 08:08:41 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Created] (TUSCANY-3986) Missing null check in JAXWSBindingInvoker for non blocking operation - posted by "Rashmi Hunt (Created) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/29 00:59:40 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Updated] (TUSCANY-3986) Missing null check in JAXWSBindingInvoker for non blocking operation - posted by "Rashmi Hunt (Updated) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/29 01:01:40 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Assigned] (TUSCANY-3986) Missing null check in JAXWSBindingInvoker for non blocking operation - posted by "Scott Kurz (Assigned) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/29 16:38:42 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Commented] (TUSCANY-3985) Manipulate custom SOAP headers - posted by "Simon Laws (Commented) (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2011/11/30 16:17:40 UTC, 1 replies.