You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
- Incubator PMC/Board report for Apr 2012 ([ppmc]) - posted by Marvin <no...@apache.org> on 2012/04/02 02:24:33 UTC, 5 replies.
- [jira] [Updated] (DIRECTMEMORY-9) Add a defragmentation mechanism - posted by "Michael André Pearce (Updated JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/04/03 21:26:26 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (DIRECTMEMORY-9) Add a defragmentation mechanism - posted by "Michael André Pearce (Issue Comment Edited JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/04/03 21:28:24 UTC, 0 replies.
- directmemory-windows - Build # 27 - Still unstable - posted by Apache Jenkins Server <je...@builds.apache.org> on 2012/04/10 00:55:57 UTC, 0 replies.
- directmemory-windows - Build # 28 - Failure - posted by Apache Jenkins Server <je...@builds.apache.org> on 2012/04/10 11:40:27 UTC, 0 replies.
- directmemory-windows - Build # 29 - Still Failing - posted by Apache Jenkins Server <je...@builds.apache.org> on 2012/04/11 23:47:36 UTC, 0 replies.
- New version of protostuff with more efficient serialization is available - posted by Roman Levenstein <ro...@gmail.com> on 2012/04/19 09:50:27 UTC, 4 replies.
- directmemory-windows - Build # 30 - Still Failing - posted by Apache Jenkins Server <je...@builds.apache.org> on 2012/04/23 00:20:17 UTC, 0 replies.
- directmemory-windows - Build # 31 - Still Failing - posted by Apache Jenkins Server <je...@builds.apache.org> on 2012/04/24 23:35:09 UTC, 0 replies.
- directmemory-windows - Build # 32 - Still Failing - posted by Apache Jenkins Server <je...@builds.apache.org> on 2012/04/27 00:05:07 UTC, 0 replies.
- directmemory-windows - Build # 33 - Still unstable - posted by Apache Jenkins Server <je...@builds.apache.org> on 2012/04/27 15:08:14 UTC, 0 replies.
- EHCache integration - posted by Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org> on 2012/04/30 19:49:02 UTC, 2 replies.
- directmemory-windows - Build # 34 - Still Unstable - posted by Apache Jenkins Server <je...@builds.apache.org> on 2012/04/30 20:27:31 UTC, 0 replies.