You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
- [GitHub] [curator] faucct commented on pull request #394: CURATOR-607: InterProcessReadWriteLock should expose exposing getLockPath - posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/10/03 18:38:24 UTC, 1 replies.
- [jira] [Work logged] (CURATOR-607) Method getLockPath of InterProcessReadWriteLock locks is not exposed for use in transactions - posted by "ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/10/03 18:39:00 UTC, 3 replies.
- [GitHub] [curator] eolivelli merged pull request #394: CURATOR-607: InterProcessReadWriteLock should expose exposing getLockPath - posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/10/03 19:11:58 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Updated] (CURATOR-607) Method getLockPath of InterProcessReadWriteLock locks is not exposed for use in transactions - posted by "Enrico Olivelli (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/10/03 19:13:00 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Resolved] (CURATOR-607) Method getLockPath of InterProcessReadWriteLock locks is not exposed for use in transactions - posted by "Enrico Olivelli (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/10/03 19:13:00 UTC, 0 replies.
- [GitHub] [curator] eolivelli commented on pull request #394: CURATOR-607: InterProcessReadWriteLock should expose exposing getLockPath - posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/10/03 20:07:55 UTC, 0 replies.
- [GitHub] [curator] pavlov112 commented on pull request #393: CURATOR-606: ModeledFrameworkImpl.update(T model, int version): Use version in all cases. - posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/10/04 14:58:49 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Work logged] (CURATOR-606) ModeledFrameworkImpl.update() ignores version for uncompressed data - posted by "ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/10/04 14:59:00 UTC, 2 replies.
- [GitHub] [curator] eolivelli merged pull request #393: CURATOR-606: ModeledFrameworkImpl.update(T model, int version): Use version in all cases. - posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/10/04 20:32:15 UTC, 0 replies.
- [GitHub] [curator] eolivelli commented on pull request #393: CURATOR-606: ModeledFrameworkImpl.update(T model, int version): Use version in all cases. - posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/10/04 20:32:37 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Assigned] (CURATOR-606) ModeledFrameworkImpl.update() ignores version for uncompressed data - posted by "Enrico Olivelli (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/10/04 20:33:00 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Resolved] (CURATOR-606) ModeledFrameworkImpl.update() ignores version for uncompressed data - posted by "Enrico Olivelli (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/10/04 20:34:00 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Created] (CURATOR-618) Allow compression level to be configurable in the GzipCompressionProvider. - posted by "Benjamin Mahler (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/10/05 18:40:00 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Created] (CURATOR-619) Replace OutstandingOps with JDK bundled Phaser - posted by "Zili Chen (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/10/16 01:38:00 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Resolved] (CURATOR-619) Replace OutstandingOps with JDK bundled Phaser - posted by "Enrico Olivelli (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/10/16 11:36:00 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Commented] (CURATOR-619) Replace OutstandingOps with JDK bundled Phaser - posted by "Zili Chen (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/10/16 12:35:00 UTC, 0 replies.
- [GitHub] [curator] eolivelli commented on pull request #365: [CURATOR-619] Replace OutstandingOps with JDK bundled Phaser - posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/10/17 00:32:01 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Work logged] (CURATOR-619) Replace OutstandingOps with JDK bundled Phaser - posted by "ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/10/17 00:33:01 UTC, 1 replies.
- [GitHub] [curator] tisonkun commented on pull request #258: added initial .travis.yml - posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/10/17 00:34:14 UTC, 0 replies.
- [GitHub] [curator] tisonkun commented on pull request #365: Replace OutstandingOps with JDK bundled Phaser - posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/10/17 00:44:34 UTC, 0 replies.
- [GitHub] [curator] tisonkun closed pull request #258: added initial .travis.yml - posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/10/17 00:46:08 UTC, 0 replies.
- [GitHub] [curator] eolivelli merged pull request #365: [CURATOR-619] Replace OutstandingOps with JDK bundled Phaser - posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/10/17 00:50:46 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Updated] (CURATOR-617) UnregisterService Method in ServiceDiscoveryImpl is non-Idempotent in case of connection-failure - posted by "Angad Singh (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/10/19 04:40:00 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Commented] (CURATOR-617) UnregisterService Method in ServiceDiscoveryImpl is non-Idempotent in case of connection-failure - posted by "Angad Singh (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/10/19 04:42:00 UTC, 0 replies.
- [jira] [Created] (CURATOR-620) Double Leadership Issue while using Leader Latch Recipe - posted by "Viswanathan Rajagopal (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/10/21 01:56:00 UTC, 0 replies.
- Double Leadership Issue - posted by Viswanathan Rajagopal <vi...@workday.com.INVALID> on 2021/10/27 15:15:21 UTC, 0 replies.
- [GitHub] [curator] woaishixiaoxiao opened a new pull request #398: fix the bug of double master when use LeaderLatch to select the leader - posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/10/29 09:30:23 UTC, 0 replies.
- [GitHub] [curator] eolivelli commented on pull request #398: fix the bug of double leader when use LeaderLatch to select the leader - posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/10/29 10:02:25 UTC, 0 replies.
- [GitHub] [curator] woaishixiaoxiao commented on pull request #398: fix the bug of double leader when use LeaderLatch to select the leader - posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/10/29 10:52:45 UTC, 0 replies.
- [GitHub] [curator] woaishixiaoxiao edited a comment on pull request #398: fix the bug of double leader when use LeaderLatch to select the leader - posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/10/29 10:55:09 UTC, 1 replies.